Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration With Optional Core Needle Biopsy of Head and Neck Lymph Nodes and Masses: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance in Treated Squamous Cell Cancer Versus All Other Lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 2275-2284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Wagner ◽  
Natosha Monfore ◽  
Austin J. McCullough ◽  
Lichao Zhao ◽  
Rachel D. Conrad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Neck Lymph Nodes

Time and Cost of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy/Core-Needle Biopsy for Primary Laryngohypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
pp. 019459982094595
Author(s):  
Dongbin Ahn ◽  
Gil Joon Lee ◽  
Jin Ho Sohn
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Biopsy Core ◽  
The Us

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate benefits in terms of time and cost of percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy/core-needle biopsy (US-FNAB/CNB) for the diagnosis of primary laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LHSCC) in comparison with direct laryngoscopic biopsy (DLB) under general anesthesia. Study Design Retrospective case-control study. Setting Single operator of a single center. Subjects and Methods From 2018 to 2019, 28 patients who underwent percutaneous US-FNAB/CNB for the diagnosis of untreated LHSCC were enrolled. All US-FNAB/CNBs were performed in the outpatient department by a single head and neck surgeon. Their results were compared with those of 27 patients who underwent DLB under general anesthesia. Results No major complications occurred in the US-FNAB/CNB and DLB groups. Time to biopsy, time to pathologic diagnosis, and time to treatment initiation in the US-FNAB/CNB and DLB groups were 0 and 14 days ( P < .001), 7 and 20 days ( P < .001), and 24 and 35 days ( P = .001), respectively. Procedure-related costs were $368.5 and $981.0 in the US-FNAB/CNB and DLB groups ( P < .001). Conclusions US-FNAB/CNB offers true benefits in terms of time and cost over those given by conventional DLB for diagnosis of LHSCC in indicated patients.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy with Core-Needle Biopsy in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teck-Kim Khoo ◽  
Claire Baker ◽  
Julie Hallanger-Johnson ◽  
Andrea Tom ◽  
Clive Grant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Aspiration Biopsy ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Fine Needle

scholarly journals A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lachlan R. Ayres ◽  
Elizabeth K. Kmiotek ◽  
Eric Lam ◽  
Jennifer J. Telford
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Fine Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
True Positive ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Fine Needle

Background and Aims. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the method of choice for sampling pancreatic lesions. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy and safety of FNB using a novel core needle to FNA in solid pancreatic lesions. Methods. A retrospective review of patients in whom EUS FNA or FNB was performed for solid pancreatic lesions was conducted. Diagnostic performance was calculated based upon a dual classification system: classification 1, only malignant pathology considered a true positive, versus classification 2, atypical, suspicious, and malignant pathology considered a true positive. Results. 43 patients underwent FNB compared with 51 FNA. Using classification 1, sensitivity was 74.0% versus 80.0%, specificity 100% versus 100%, and diagnostic accuracy 77.0% versus 80.0% for FNB versus FNA, respectively (all p>0.05). Using classification 2, sensitivity was 97% versus 94.0%, specificity 100% versus 100%, and diagnostic accuracy 98.0% versus 94.0% for FNB versus FNA, respectively (all p>0.05). FNB required significantly fewer needle passes (median = 2) compared to FNA (median = 3; p<0.001). Adverse events occurred in two (4.5%) FNB patients compared with none in the FNA group (p>0.05). Conclusion. FNA and FNB have comparable sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. FNB required fewer passes.

Ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration or core needle biopsy for diagnosing follicular thyroid carcinoma?

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 468-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko Woon Park ◽  
Jung Hee Shin ◽  
Soo Yeon Hahn ◽  
Young Lyun Oh ◽  
Sun Wook Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Fine Needle
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document