scholarly journals AIUM-ACR-SPR-SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination for Detection and Assessment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. E1-E5 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Practice Parameter ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

scholarly journals Timing of Repeat Ultrasound Examination in Treatment of Stable Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-208
Author(s):  
Wesley W.E.S. Theunissen ◽  
Marieke van der Steen ◽  
Florens Q.M.P. van Douveren ◽  
Adhiambo M.A. Witlox ◽  
Jaap J. Tolk
Keyword(s):  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

scholarly journals Neonatal hip dysplasia: Differental diagnosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 609-613
Author(s):  
Milos Pajic ◽  
Zoran Vukasinovic ◽  
Igor Seslija ◽  
Zorica Zivkovic
Keyword(s):  
Hip Dysplasia ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Neonatal Period ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Clinical Tests ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Neonatal Hip ◽  
Elementary Form ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Introduction. Hip dysplasia is the elementary form of the developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The diagnosis may be made by the ultrasound examination (types II a-, II b). Objective. The aim of the authors was to define the congenital structural neonatal hip dysplasia, and to differentiate hip hypoplasia, hip dysplasia and teratogenic anomalies. Methods. In all the cases, the uniform clinical and ultrasound tests were performed. All the patients were examined in the neonatal period of life (the first six weeks). The following clinical tests were used: Le Damany-Ortolany, Coleman-Barlow-Palmen and Weissman-Strinovic. For the ultrasound examination, the Graph?s method was used. Results. The investigation was performed in the period 2007- 2008. 2,878 neonates were included. The distribution of the sonotypes, according to Graph, was as follows: Ia in 16.17%. Ib in 65.08%; IIa+ in 18.17%, IIc in 0.28%, IId in 0.19%; IIIa in 0.009%, IIIb in 0.02%; and IV in 0.01%. It was found that DDH was 8 times more frequent in girls; located more frequently at the left side than bilaterally. Conclusion. Hip sonoscreening has to be performed in all newborns in the first 72 hours. The suggested follow-up period is six weeks: for the diagnosis - the first three weeks, and for the prevention and treatment - all six weeks.

scholarly journals The predictive value of the clinical sign of excessive hip abduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH)

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Svemir Čustović ◽  
Kenan Čustović
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Sign ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Graf Method ◽  
The University ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Aim To assess the relationship between the clinical sign of excessive hip abduction (abduction of the hip 90 degrees or more) and developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods The research was conducted on 450 newborns in the Neonatal Unit at the Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Clinic of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the University Clinical Centre, Tuzla, between 30th August 2011 and 30th April 2012. Clinical (degree of hip abduction) and ultrasound examination of all newborns hip were performed using the Graf method on their first day of life. Results Clinical sign of excessive hip abduction showed significant predictive value for DDH. There were 37 (8.2%) newborns with the clinical sign of excessive hip abduction, of which 13 of them had DDH while 24 of them did not have this clinical sign. There were 89 newborns, in the overall sample, with one of the forms of DDH, 13 (12.7%) of them had this clinical sign, while from 324 newborns witouth DDH, 24 (6.9%) had this clinical sign. Excessive hip abduction had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 35.1% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 78.5% for DDH. Conclusion Excessive hip abduction is an useful and important clinical sign of DDH. Doctors who perform the first examination of the child after birth, would have to turn their attention to this clinical sign. The newborns with this clinical sign would have to go to an ultrasound examination of the hips for further diagnosis.

scholarly journals The role of the labrum in early treatment of unstable developmental dysplasia of the hip

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 296-301
Author(s):  
Maurizio De Pellegrin ◽  
Lucrezia Montanari ◽  
Desiree Moharamzadeh ◽  
Oliver Eberhardt
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Type D ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
The Us ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

The objective of the paper is to analyse the role of the labrum with particular attention to its morphological changes in unstable dysplastic hips during treatment. Between January 2013 and December 2015, data were collected on 86 unstable, dysplastic hips, which were divided into type D (n = 13), type III (n = 49) and type IV (n = 24). The labrum was evaluated with ultrasound examination (US) for echogenicity and dimensions with inter-/intra-observer tests comparing the US images at diagnosis and at the end of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed. At the end of treatment of unstable, dysplastic hips, the labrum was more echogenic with a frequency of 97% and was larger with a frequency of 96%. The labrum has an active stabilizing role in unstable dysplastic hips and it undergoes a statistically significant increase of echogenicity and dimensions after treatment. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180053

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document