Trends in the surgical treatment of pathological proximal femur fractures in the United States

2019 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 994-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H. Varady ◽  
Bishoy T. Ameen ◽  
Pierre‐Emmanuel Schwab ◽  
Caleb M. Yeung ◽  
Antonia F. Chen
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
The United States ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures

Outcome of non-surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures in the fragile elderly population

Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1347-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tal Frenkel Rutenberg ◽  
Aseel Assaly ◽  
Maria Vitenberg ◽  
Shai Shemesh ◽  
Alon Burg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Non Surgical Treatment

Analysis of surgical treatment in elderly and senile patients with proximal femur fractures by extracortical plate osteosynthesis

TRAUMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
А.V. Kalchenko ◽  
V.А. Babalyan ◽  
А.N. Khvysyuk ◽  
Т.S. Gurbanova ◽  
V.V. Cherepov
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures

scholarly journals THE USE OF THE PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL IN THE TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL FEMUR FRACTURES IN THE OLD PATIENTS

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
V. N. Borovkov ◽  
A. A. Khrupalov ◽  
G. V. Sorokin
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Municipal Hospital ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Analysis Of Results ◽  
Proximal Femur Nail

The analysis of results of surgical treatment of 157 patients with proximal femur fractures was presented. In all cases the osteosynthesis using fixator PFN was performed in clinic of traumatology amd orthopedics of Moscow Municipal Hospital N 71 from 2005 till 2009. The authors concluded: proximal femur nail is mini-invasive and mini-traumatic fixator that is essential at treatment of elderly and old patients.

Surgical treatment for chronic proximal femur fractures

Vrach ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
A. Lazarev ◽  
E. Solod ◽  
A. Antonov ◽  
D. Vychuzhanin
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures

scholarly journals Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures in Patients with COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 9-18
Author(s):  
Konstantin S. Egorov ◽  
Valery V. Strizheletsky ◽  
Igor G. Ivanov ◽  
Valentin A. Neverov ◽  
Natalia V. Siverskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Coronavirus Infection

Background. In relation with the COVID-19 new coronavirus infection epidemic that began in Russia in the spring of 2020, a completely new group of patients appeared: patients whose coronavirus infection was combined with the proximal femur fractures. In the course of practical work, hospital doctors had to gain experience in treating these complex patients, solve new organizational and medical tasks. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of treatment of patients with the proximal femur fractures in combination with coronavirus infection in a covid hospital at the hospital stage, 30-day and 6-month terms. Materials and Methods. The retrospective study is based on the collection and generalization of data from 64 patients with the proximal femur fractures in combination with confirmed coronavirus infection who underwent inpatient treatment from 16.03.2020 to 31.05.2021. 38 (59.4%) patients had a femoral neck fracture, 26 (40.6%) had a fracture of the trochanter region. Forty (62.5%) patients underwent surgical treatment (hip replacement was performed in 23 cases, osteosynthesis was performed in 17 cases), 24 (37.5%) patients did not undergo surgery. Results. With conservative treatment, the hospital mortality rate was 41.6%, the 30-day mortality rate was 72.7%, and the 6 month mortality rate was 95.5%. During surgical treatment, the hospital mortality rate was 5.0% (2 patients died). Early postoperative complications were detected in 5 (12.5%) patients. Thirty-one (77.5%) patients walked or stood with a walker on their own at the time of discharge; 7 (17.5%) patients could not be activated. The thirty-day mortality rate in the group of patients who underwent surgical treatment was 8.6%, and the 6-month mortality rate was 32.1%. Conclusion. Surgical treatment of patients with the proximal femur fractures in combination with coronavirus infection is much more difficult than the treatment of patients without infectious pathology. However, despite number of unresolved problems, surgical treatment of such patients is possible with good results and should be actively applied.

scholarly journals Hardware removal rates after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 140 (8) ◽  
pp. 1047-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ville T. Ponkilainen ◽  
Tuomas T. Huttunen ◽  
Pekka Kannus ◽  
Ville M. Mattila
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Hardware Removal ◽  
Removal Rates ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document