Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Ferguson ◽  
Monica Reid Kerrigan ◽  
Katrina A. Hovey
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Research Synthesis ◽  
Mixed Studies Review ◽  
Systematic Mixed Studies Review

scholarly journals Perseverance with technology-facilitated home-based upper limb practice after stroke: a systematic mixed studies review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridee A. Neibling ◽  
Sarah M. Jackson ◽  
Kathryn S. Hayward ◽  
Ruth N. Barker
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Stroke Survivors ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Design Strategies ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Mixed Studies Review ◽  
Assess Quality ◽  
Surrogate Measures ◽  
Systematic Mixed Studies Review

Abstract Background Technology is being increasingly investigated as an option to allow stroke survivors to exploit their full potential for recovery by facilitating home-based upper limb practice. This review seeks to explore the factors that influence perseverance with technology-facilitated home-based upper limb practice after stroke. Methods A systematic mixed studies review with sequential exploratory synthesis was undertaken. Studies investigating adult stroke survivors with upper limb disability undertaking technology-facilitated home-based upper limb practice administered ≥ 3 times/week over a period of ≥ 4 weeks were included. Qualitative outcomes were stroke survivors’ and family members’ perceptions of their experience utilising technology to facilitate home-based upper limb practice. Quantitative outcomes were adherence and dropouts, as surrogate measures of perseverance. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess quality of included studies. Results Forty-two studies were included. Six studies were qualitative and of high quality; 28 studies were quantitative and eight were mixed methods studies, all moderate to low quality. A conceptual framework of perseverance with three stages was formed: (1) getting in the game; (2) sticking with it, and; (3) continuing or moving on. Conditions perceived to influence perseverance, and factors mediating these conditions were identified at each stage. Adherence with prescribed dose ranged from 13 to 140%. Participants were found to be less likely to adhere when prescribed sessions were more frequent (6–7 days/week) or of longer duration (≥ 12 weeks). Conclusion From the mixed methods findings, we propose a framework for perseverance with technology-facilitated home-based upper limb practice. The framework offers opportunities for clinicians and researchers to design strategies targeting factors that influence perseverance with practice, in both the clinical prescription of practice and technology design. To confirm the clinical utility of this framework, further research is required to explore perseverance and the factors influencing perseverance. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42017072799—https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=72799

Factors That Influence Substance Use Among American Indian/Alaskan Native Youth: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 107839032110380
Author(s):  
Cedric Woods ◽  
BoRam Kim ◽  
Kristine Guo ◽  
Tuyet Nyguen ◽  
Sarin Taplayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Native American ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
American Indian ◽  
Substance Misuse ◽  
Alaskan Native ◽  
Systems Model ◽  
Mixed Studies Review ◽  
Native Youth ◽  
Systematic Mixed Studies Review

BACKGROUND: The American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) mortality rate from illicit drug use was 22.7%, double that of the general population between 2007 and 2009. Fifteen percent of AI/AN youth reported receiving treatment for substance use compared with 10% of non-AI/AN peers. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to explore the factors that influence substance use among AI/AN youth. METHOD: We performed a systematic review using a results-based convergent synthesis design. Eight electronic databases were searched for articles published between 2014 and 2019 using the search terms “Native American youth,” “Native American adolescent,” “Native Youth,” “substance use,” “substance misuse,” and “substance abuse.” The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to appraise the studies. RESULTS: Forty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria (44 quantitative, one qualitative, and two mixed-methods studies). The results were organized using the ecological systems model and included evaluation of both protective and risk factors related to AI/AN youth substance use. Three system levels were found to influence substance use: individual, micro- and macrosystems. The individual systems-level coping mechanisms played a key role in whether AI/AN youth initiated substance use. Family, school, and peer factors influence the microsystem level. At the macrosystem level, community environmental factors were influential. CONCLUSION: The major factor linking all the systems was the influence of a connected relationship with a prosocial adult who instilled future aspirations and a positive cultural identity. Findings of this systematic mixed studies review will assist in intervention development for AI/AN youth to prevent substance misuse.

Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romina Pace ◽  
Pierre Pluye ◽  
Gillian Bartlett ◽  
Ann C. Macaulay ◽  
Jon Salsberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Studies Review ◽  
Appraisal Tool ◽  
Systematic Mixed Studies Review

scholarly journals The types and effects of feedback received by emergency ambulance staff: protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with narrative synthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Wilson ◽  
Gillian Janes ◽  
Rebecca Lawton ◽  
Jonathan Benn
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Narrative Synthesis ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Emergency Ambulance ◽  
Mixed Studies Review ◽  
Feedback Content ◽  
Automated Feedback ◽  
Effects Of Feedback ◽  
Systematic Mixed Studies Review

PurposeThe primary aim of this systematic review is to identify, describe and synthesise the published literature on the types and effects of feedback received by emergency ambulance staff. The secondary aim will be to describe the mechanisms and moderators of the effects of prehospital feedback in an organisational context.Design/methodology/approachThe application and effects of feedback for healthcare professionals, to support improved practice, is well researched within the wider healthcare domain. Within a prehospital context, research into feedback has been developing in specific areas such as automated feedback from defibrillators and debrief after simulation. However, to date there has been no systematic review published on the types and effects of feedback available to emergency ambulance staff.FindingsThis study will be a systematic mixed studies review including empirical primary research of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods methodology published in peer-reviewed journals in English. Studies will be included if they explore the concept of feedback as defined in this review, i.e. the systematised provision of information to emergency ambulance staff regarding their performance within prehospital practice and/or patient outcomes. The search strategy will consist of three facets: ambulance staff synonyms, feedback synonyms and feedback content. The databases to be searched from inception are MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, PsycINFO, HMIC, CINAHL and Web of Science. Study quality will be appraised using the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) developed by Hong et al. (2018). Data analysis will consist of narrative synthesis guided by Popay et al. (2006) following a parallel-results convergent synthesis design.Originality/valueRegistration: PROSPERO (CRD42020162600)

scholarly journals The types and effects of feedback received by emergency ambulance staff: a systematic mixed studies review with narrative synthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-69
Author(s):  
Caitlin Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Search Strategy ◽  
Narrative Synthesis ◽  
Hospital Practice ◽  
Emergency Ambulance ◽  
Mixed Studies Review ◽  
Effects Of Feedback ◽  
Systematic Mixed Studies Review

<sec id="s1"> Aims: The phenomenon of feedback is well-researched within the wider healthcare context, where it is suggested that feedback can improve patient care and patient safety by enhancing clinical performance and staff mental health (Ivers et al., 2012). Within a pre-hospital context, systematic reviews have been conducted for automated feedback from defibrillators and debrief after simulation, but not on the wider concept of feedback. The aim of this systematic review was to identify, describe and synthesise the published literature on the types and effects of feedback received by emergency ambulance staff. </sec> <sec id="s2"> Methods: This study is a systematic mixed studies review including empirical primary research of qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods methodology published in peer-reviewed journals in English. Studies were included if they explored the concept of feedback as defined in this review, i.e. the systematised provision of information to emergency ambulance staff regarding their performance within pre-hospital practice and/or patient outcomes. The search strategy consisted of three facets: ambulance staff synonyms, feedback synonyms and feedback content. Databases searched on 11 June 2020 from inception were MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, PsycInfo, HMIC, CINAHL and Web of Science. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (Hong et al., 2018), and data were analysed using narrative synthesis guided by Popay et al. (2006) following a parallel-results convergent synthesis design. </sec> <sec id="s3"> Results: The search strategy yielded 2424 articles, excluding duplicates. Seventy-eight studies met the inclusion criteria after full-text review, of which 37 only mentioned feedback as a solution to improving specific circumstances (e.g. decision-making, burnout). The remaining 41 studies consisted of: 34 interventional pre-hospital feedback studies; four non-interventional feedback studies; and three preparatory studies. The source, content and mode of pre-hospital feedback represented in the studies varied greatly and encompassed feedback on behaviour and/or feedback on outcomes of behaviour (Michie et al., 2013). The main outcome measure of included studies was quality of care (e.g. quality of CPR, adherence to guidelines) but softer measures such as staff wellbeing, professional development and clinical decision-making were also represented. </sec> <sec id="s4"> Conclusion: It is anticipated that the review findings will be useful to guide the development of future pre-hospital feedback interventions, for which there is growing interest in the national and international pre-hospital setting. Further empirical research is required to explore whether the published literature reflects current pre-hospital practice. </sec>

scholarly journals Advantages and challenges in using telehealth for home-based palliative care: A systematic mixed studies review protocol (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simen A Steindal ◽  
Andréa Aparecida Goncalves Nes ◽  
Tove E. Godskesen ◽  
Susanne Lind ◽  
Alfhild Dhle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Mixed Studies Review ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Systematic Mixed Studies Review ◽  
At Home

BACKGROUND Due to the increasing number of people in need of palliative care services and the current health care professional workforce strain, providing equitable, quality palliative care has become a challenge. Telehealth could be an innovative approach to palliative care delivery, enabling patients to spend more time or even remain at home, if they wish, throughout the illness trajectory. However, no previous systematic mixed studies reviews have synthesized evidence on patients’ experiences of the advantages and challenges of telehealth for home-based palliative care. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic mixed studies review is to critically appraise and synthesize findings from studies that investigated patients’ use of telehealth in home-based palliative care with a focus on the advantages and challenges experienced by the patients. METHODS This article describes the protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with a convergent design. The reporting will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. A systematic search was performed in eight databases for studies published from January 2010 to June 2020. The search will be updated in 2021. Pairs of authors will independently assess eligibility, extract data and assess methodological quality. The data will then be analyzed using thematic synthesis. RESULTS We described the rationale and design of a systematic mixed studies review. The database searches were performed on June 25, 2020. Assessment of eligibility and further steps have not yet been performed. Results are anticipated by August 2021. CONCLUSIONS Following the ethos of patient-centered palliative care, this systematic mixed studies review could contribute recommendations for practice and policy enabling the development of telehealth applications and services that align with patients’ preferences and needs when using telehealth applications and services at home.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document