Elimination of hospital‐acquired central line‐associated bloodstream infection on a mixed‐service pediatric unit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan A. Mezoff ◽  
Erika Roberts ◽  
Daniel Ernst ◽  
Michelle Gniadek ◽  
Wendi Beauseau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Hospital Acquired

scholarly journals Impact of Medicare’s Hospital-Acquired Condition Policy on Infections in Safety Net and Non–Safety Net Hospitals

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Elaine Vaz ◽  
Kenneth P. Kleinman ◽  
Alison Tse Kawai ◽  
Robert Jin ◽  
William J. Kassler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
The United States ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Hospital Acquired Conditions ◽  
Hospital Acquired

BACKGROUNDPolicymakers may wish to align healthcare payment and quality of care while minimizing unintended consequences, particularly for safety net hospitals.OBJECTIVETo determine whether the 2008 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Conditions policy had a differential impact on targeted healthcare-associated infection rates in safety net compared with non–safety net hospitals.DESIGNInterrupted time-series design.SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSNonfederal acute care hospitals that reported central line–associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia rates to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Health Safety Network from July 1, 2007, through December 31, 2013.RESULTSWe did not observe changes in the slope of targeted infection rates in the postpolicy period compared with the prepolicy period for either safety net (postpolicy vs prepolicy ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.84–1.09]) or non–safety net (0.99 [0.90–1.10]) hospitals. Controlling for prepolicy secular trends, we did not detect differences in an immediate change at the time of the policy between safety net and non–safety net hospitals (P for 2-way interaction, .87).CONCLUSIONSThe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Conditions policy did not have an impact, either positive or negative, on already declining rates of central line–associated bloodstream infection in safety net or non–safety net hospitals. Continued evaluations of the broad impact of payment policies on safety net hospitals will remain important as the use of financial incentives and penalties continues to expand in the United States.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;00(0): 1–7

scholarly journals Comparison of Total Hospital-Acquired Bloodstream Infections to Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections and Implications for Outcome Measures in Infection Control

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 984-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surbhi Leekha ◽  
Shanshan Li ◽  
Kerri A. Thom ◽  
Michael Anne Preas ◽  
Brian S. Caffo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Prevention Intervention ◽  
Hospital Acquired

The validity of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) measure is compromised by subjectivity. We observed significant decreases in both CLABSIs and total hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (BSIs) following a CLABSI prevention intervention in adult intensive care units. Total hospital-acquired BSIs could be explored as an adjunct, objective CLABSI measure.

Feeding Practices, Lines, and Hospital-Acquired Infection during the Sustenance Phase of Infection Control Quality Improvement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa KS ◽  
Bharathi Balachander ◽  
Suman Rao PN
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Enteral Feeding ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Feeding Practices ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Health Care Associated Infections ◽  
Sentinel Events ◽  
Per Oral ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Objectives Nosocomial infections are a significant threat to the survival and neurodevelopment of neonates .The present study attempts to correlate enteral feeding practices as measured by nil per oral (NPO days) with bloodstream infection (BSI) rates and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) over a period of 2 years and 3 months. Methods This was a prospective observational study done in a tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Data were recorded on the presence of central lines or peripheral intravenous (IV) lines, receipt of intravenous fluids (IVF), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or IV antibiotics, and mechanical ventilation status. BSI and CLABSI, regarded as sentinel events, were recorded and root cause analysis done. Results A total of 3,448 infants constituting 17,846 patient days with mean gestational age and birth weight of 34.3 ± 3 weeks and 1,868 ± 434 g, respectively were studied. NPO per 1,000 days shows a significant positive correlation with BSI (ρ = 0.513; p = 0.004), CLABSI (ρ = 0.425; p = 0.021), antibiotic days (ρ = 0.7; p < 0.000), IV fluid days (ρ = 0.459; p = 0.014), and central line days (ρ = 0.634; p < 0.001). The IV fluid days showed correlation with BSI (ρ = 0.4, p ≤ 0.03) and CLABSI (ρ = 0.43, p = 0.02). Conclusion BSI in NICU correlates with higher NPO and IV fluid days. Strengthening of enteral feeding practices reduces health care-associated infections.

Centers for medicare and medicaid services hospital-acquired conditions policy for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and cather-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) shows minimal impact on hospital reimbursement

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 897-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Calderwood ◽  
Alison Tse Kawai ◽  
Robert Jin ◽  
Grace M. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Hospital Reimbursement ◽  
Hospital Acquired Conditions ◽  
Hospital Acquired

ObjectiveIn 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) stopped reimbursing for hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) not present on admission (POA). We sought to understand why this policy did not impact central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) trends.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingAcute-care hospitals in the United States.ParticipantsFee-for-service Medicare patients discharged January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2011.MethodsUsing inpatient Medicare claims data, we analyzed billing practices before and after the HAC policy was implemented, including the use and POA designation of codes for CLABSI or CAUTI. For the 3-year period following policy implementation, we determined the impact on diagnosis-related groups (DRG) determining reimbursement as well as hospital characteristics associated with the reimbursement impact.ResultsDuring the study period, 65,205,607 Medicare fee-for-service hospitalizations occurred at 3,291 acute-care, nonfederal US hospitals. Based on coding, CLABSI and CAUTI affected 0.23% and 0.06% of these hospitalizations, respectively. In addition, following the HAC policy, 82% of the CLABSI codes and 91% of the CAUTI codes were marked POA, which represented a large increase in the use of this designation. Finally, for the small numbers of CLABSI and CAUTI coded as not POA, financial impacts were detected on only 0.4% of the hospitalizations with a CLABSI code and 5.7% with a CAUTI code.ConclusionsPart of the reason the HAC policy did not have its intended impact is that billing codes for CLABSI and CAUTI were rarely used, were commonly listed as POA in the postpolicy period, and infrequently impacted hospital reimbursement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document