Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill Versus the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002: Are They Comparable for Assessing Risk of Malnutrition in Critically Ill Patients?

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Canales ◽  
Ali Elsayes ◽  
D. Dante Yeh ◽  
Donna Belcher ◽  
Anna Nakayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nutrition Risk ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 Cut-Off to Identify High-Risk Is a Good Predictor of ICU Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Rafaela Monteiro de Almeida Maciel ◽  
Oellen Stuani Franzosi ◽  
Diego Silva Leite Nunes ◽  
Sérgio Henrique Loss ◽  
Audrey Machado dos Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Good Predictor ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Nutritional Risk Screening 2002: sinnvolles Messinstrument in der Pneumologie?

Pneumologie ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 65 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Priegnitz ◽  
I Kietzmann ◽  
K Richter ◽  
M Treml ◽  
WJ Randerath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

scholarly journals Comparison of Feeding Efficiency and Hospital Mortality between Small Bowel and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Critically Ill Patients at High Nutritional Risk

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2009
Author(s):  
Wei-Ning Wang ◽  
Chen-Yu Wang ◽  
Chiann-Yi Hsu ◽  
Pin-Kuei Fu
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Nasogastric Tube ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutrition Risk ◽  
Achievement Rate

Nasogastric tube enteral nutrition (NGEN) should be initiated within 48 h for patients at high nutritional risk. However, whether small bowel enteral nutrition (SBEN) should be routinely used instead of NGEN to improve hospital mortality remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 113 critically ill patients with modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score ≥ 5 and feeding volume < 750 mL/day in the first week of their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Age, sex, mNUTRIC score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score were matched in the SBEN (n = 48) and NGEN (n = 65) groups. Through a univariate analysis, factors associated with hospital mortality were SBEN group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31–1.00), Simplified Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on day 7 (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03–1.22), and energy intake achievement rate < 65% (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.25–5.11). A multivariate analysis indicated that energy intake achievement rate < 65% on the third follow-up day (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.12–4.69) was the only factor independently associated with mortality. We suggest initiation of SBEN on the seventh ICU day before parenteral nutrition initiation for critically ill patients at high nutrition risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document