Radiographic morphometry and densitometry predict strength of cadaveric proximal humeri more reliably than age and DXA scan density

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Skedros ◽  
Alex N. Knight ◽  
Todd C. Pitts ◽  
Peter J. O'Rourke ◽  
Wayne Z. Burkhead
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 836.1-836
Author(s):  
N. Grygorieva ◽  
V. Povoroznyuk

Background:Nowadays, FRAX is the most useful tool for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment that is included in many guidelines. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and glucocorticoid (CG) use are two crucial factors for osteoporotic fractures included in FRAX algorithm. According to the last ACR guidelines for the treatment of GC-induced osteoporosis [1], it was recommended to divide the patients into three groups of fracture risk (high, medium and low) that have a great impact on treatment decision. Recently, we received own Ukrainian thresholds [2] for the national version of FRAX that are age-dependent and now widely used in clinical practice.Objectives:Our study was aimed to compare two approaches (ACR-2017 and Ukrainian (2019) recommendations) in fracture risk assessment in women with RA and GC use.Methods:We examined 195 females with RA aged 40-89 years old who took GC (at dose ≥5 mg/d for ≥3 months) due to RA. The 10-year probabilities of major osteoporotic (MOFs) and hip fractures (HFs) were calculated with and without bone mineral density (BMD) using the Ukrainian FRAX model [3]. The DXA was used to measure the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total body BMDs; T and Z scores were calculated (DISCOVERY Wi, Hologic, Inc., USA).Results:FRAX indexes for MOFs and HFs without BMD in patients with RA and GC were (Me [25-75Q]) 12.0 [8.1-18.0] and 4.2 [1.7-7.2] %. The correspondent FRAX indexes with BMD were 13.5 [8.5-20.0] and 5.1 [1.8-8.7] %.50 % of examined women had previous fractures and 20 % had previous vertebral fractures. BMD of the femoral neck consisted of 0.62±0.13 and L1-L4 BMD was 0.85±0.15 g/cm2. 89 % of females had low BMD at the lumbar spine and / or femoral neck (49 % osteoporosis and 40 % osteopenia).61 % of women required antiosteoporotic treatment according to ACR-2017 guideline (17.4 % of them a hadhigh risk of MOF and 43.1 % moderate one) without BMD measurement and 64 % of subjects after DXA scan.According to Ukrainian national guideline, 57 % of patients required antiosteoporotic treatment without BMD measurement and 42 % – after additional DXA examination. After BMD measurement in subjects who required the DXA scan, 78.2 % of females with RA and GC use required antiosteoporotic treatment (additionally to calcium and vitamin D, lifestyle modifications).Conclusion:Approximately 60 % of subjects with RA and GC use required antiosteoporotic treatment without additional DXA measurement according to correspondent FRAX indexes from both guidelines. The proportion of women requiring treatment after DXA scan is slightly higher according to Ukrainian recommendations. It proves that both of them can be used effectively in daily clinical practice for fracture risk assessment in females with RA.References:[1]Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, Cannon M et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 2017;69(8), 1521–1537. DOI:10.1002/art.40137[2]Povoroznyuk V, Grygorieva N, Kanis JA et al. Ukrainian FRAX: criteria for diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis. Pain. Joint. Spine. 2019;9(4):7-16. DOI: 10.22141/2224-1507.9.4.2019.191921[3]Povoroznyuk VV, Grygorieva NV, Kanis JA et al. Epidemiology of hip fracture and the development of FRAX in Ukraine. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):53. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0343-2.Disclosure of Interests:Nataliia Grygorieva Consultant of: Servier, Redis, Vladyslav Povoroznyuk: None declared.


2019 ◽  
Vol 316 (1) ◽  
pp. R59-R67
Author(s):  
Tamara Hew-Butler ◽  
Kailyn Angelakos ◽  
Joshua Szczepanski

The purpose of this study was to assess relationships between plasma sodium concentration ([Na+]) and bone mineral content (BMC) after an acute sodium load plus treadmill walking and then quantify the amount of sodium the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan could detect. The primary study was a single-blind randomized control crossover trial under two conditions: ingestion of six flour tablets (placebo trial) or six 1-g NaCl tablets (salt intervention trial). The tablets were ingested after baseline blood and urine collection followed immediately by the DXA scan. After 60 min of rest, a 45-min treadmill walk was conducted. Immediately postexercise, blood and urine were collected and the DXA scan was repeated. Main outcomes included changes (∆: post minus pre) in plasma [Na+] and BMC. Additionally, six 1-g NaCl tablets were superimposed over a DXA spine phantom for separate quantification of sodium as BMC. Fourteen subjects completed the primary study. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA tests revealed significant interaction ( F = 13.06; P = 0.0007), condition ( F = 21.88; P < 0.001), and time ( F = 6.51; P = 0.014) effects in plasma [Na+]. A significant condition ( F = 6.46; P = 0.014) effect was also noted in urine [Na+]. Total body BMC∆ was negatively correlated with plasma [Na+]∆ ( r = −0.43; P = 0.02) and urine [Na+]∆ ( r = −0.47; P = 0.01). Total body BMC∆ in the salt intervention trial [−5.5 (27) g] closely approximated the amount of NaCl ingested and subsequently absorbed into the bloodstream. The DXA scan quantified 67% of NaCl tablets as BMC in spine phantom analyses. Total body BMC∆ was negatively related to plasma and urine [Na+]∆ after treadmill walking. Reductions in total body BMC closely approximated the amount of NaCl ingested (~6 g). The DXA scan quantified NaCl as BMC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A209-A209
Author(s):  
Catherine Stewart ◽  
Paul Benjamin Loughrey ◽  
John R Lindsay

Abstract Background: Osteopetrosis is a group of rare inherited skeletal dysplasias, with each variant sharing the hallmark of increased bone mineral density (BMD). Abnormal osteoclast activity produces overly dense bone predisposing to fracture and skeletal deformities. Whilst no cure for these disorders exists, endocrinologists play an important role in surveillance and management of complications. Clinical Cases: A 43-year-old female had findings suggestive of increased BMD on radiographic imaging performed to investigate shoulder and back pain. X-ray of lumbar spine demonstrated a ‘rugger jersey’ spine appearance, while shoulder X-ray revealed mixed lucency and sclerosis of the humeral head. DXA scan showed T-scores of +11 at the hip and +12.5 at the lumbar spine. MRI of head displayed bilateral narrowing and elongation of the internal acoustic meatus and narrowing of the orbital foramina. Genetic assessment confirmed autosomal dominant osteopetrosis with a CLCN7 variant. Oral colecalciferol supplementation was commenced and multi-disciplinary management instigated with referral to ophthalmology and ENT teams. A 25-year-old male presented with a seven-year history of low back pain and prominent bony swelling around the tibial tuberosities and nape of neck. Past medical history included repeated left scaphoid fracture in 2008 and 2018. Recovery from his scaphoid fracture was complicated by non-union requiring bone grafting with open reduction and fixation. Plain X-rays of the spine again demonstrated ‘rugger jersey’ spine. DXA scan was notable for elevated T scores; +2.9 at hip and +5.8 lumbar spine. MRI spine showed vertebral endplate cortical thickening and sclerosis at multiple levels. The patient declined genetic testing and is under clinical review. A 62-year-old male was referred to the bone metabolism service following a DXA scan showing T scores of +11. 7 at the hip and +13 at the lumbar spine. His primary complaint was of neck pain and on MRI there was multi-level nerve root impingement secondary to facet joint hypertrophy. Past medical history was significant for a long history of widespread joint pains; previous X-ray reports described generalized bony sclerosis up to 11 years previously. Clinical and radiological monitoring continues. Conclusion: Individuals with osteopetrosis require a multidisciplinary approach to management. There is no curative treatment and mainstay of therapy is supportive with active surveillance for complications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-82
Author(s):  
Nour Abd Alrazaq Hassan ◽  
◽  
Tahseen Hussain Mubarak ◽  
Nameer Fadhel Gheaeb

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 613-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kitty S. Chan ◽  
◽  
Marina Mourtzakis ◽  
Lisa Aronson Friedman ◽  
Victor D. Dinglas ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajinder Notey ◽  
Mayla Buensalido ◽  
Rosario Ann Del ◽  
Neil Gittoes ◽  
Sherwin Criseno

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad Alkutobi ◽  
Deena Laila ◽  
Mohammad Tariq

Abstract Background Denosumab and zoledronate are increasingly prescribed for primary and secondary osteoporosis long-term management. Methods A retrospective audit was conducted at Basildon Hospital during 2012-2019 using the NICE guidelines standards to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of denosumab and zoledronate. Number of patients was 84, diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia, 34 of them received 10 or more denosumab injections and 50 patients planned to receive 5 zoledronate infusions (9 patients received 5 and 38 patients received 4). Results Forty percent of the patients were at their 8th decade followed by 28.57% and 21.42 % at their 9th and 7th decades respectively. More than 90% were Caucasian females. Primary prevention was in 39.28% and secondary prevention in 60.71%. The commonest sites of fracture were the wrist and vertebrae at 34.37% for each; followed by the neck of femur and humerous at 12.5% for each. Denosumab was the 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th line of treatment in 9.52%, 13.09%, 16.66% and 1.19% respectively; whereas zoledronate was the 1st, 2nd or 3rd line of treatment in 13.09%, 40.47% and 5.95% respectively. The commonest reason for choosing denosumab as the first line was chronic kidney disease, whereas the reason for choosing it as the 2nd or 3rd line was inefficacy of bisphosphonate in 69% or gastrointestinal side effects in 14%. Zoledronate was chosen in all cases because of intolerability to oral bisphosphonate or gastrointestinal side effects. Repeat DXA scan was performed after the 5th, 10th denosumab injections and the 3rd zoledronate infusions. After the 5th Denosumab, DXA scan showed improvement or stability in 100% and 85.29% at the spine and hip respectively whilst deterioration was seen in 14.7% at the hip. After the 10th denosumab, the rate of improvement or stability at the spine was reduced to 88.23% and decline was seen in 2.94%. At the hip area, 73.52% continued to show improvement or stability, whilst 17.66 % showed deterioration. After the 3rd zoledronate, 98% and 88% showed improvement or stability at the spine and hip respectively whilst deterioration seen in 2% and 12% at the spine and hip respectively. One patient on zoledronate experienced dental issues after the 4th injection and stopped treatment. There were no jaw osteonecrosis, no new fractures and no significant side effects with either denosumab or zoledronate. Ninety percent of patients who completed 10 denosumab injections were planned to continue for another 5 injections. Conclusion After the period of 3-5 years, denosumab and zoledronate were well tolerated and BMD was either stable or improved at both spinal and hip sites. There were few cases of deterioration mainly at the hip area with both zoledronate and denosumab. Future researches are needed to stratify guidelines on discontinuation of denosumab. Disclosures Z. Alkutobi None. D. Laila None. M. Tariq None. A. Nandagudi None.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Su Moon ◽  
Nam-Hyun Kim ◽  
Jin-Oh Park ◽  
Si-Young Park ◽  
Ho-Joong Kim ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e505-e515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Stratton ◽  
Xin Hu ◽  
Pamela R. Soulos ◽  
Amy J. Davidoff ◽  
Lajos Pusztai ◽  
...  

Purpose: In postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), most expert panels advise baseline bone mineral density testing with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan repeated every 1 to 2 years. How often this recommendation is followed is unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of women with stage I to III breast cancer who started AI therapy from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2010, with follow-up through December 31, 2012, by using the SEER-Medicare database. Selection criteria included AI use for ≥ 6 months and no recent osteoporosis diagnosis or bisphosphonate use. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate associations between patient characteristics and receipt of a baseline DXA scan. In patients who continued AI treatment, we assessed rates of follow-up scans. Results: In the sample of 2,409 patients (median age, 74 years), 51.0% received a baseline DXA scan. Demographic characteristics associated with the absence of a baseline DXA scan were older age (85 to 94 years v 67 to 69 years; odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92) and black v white race (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.97). Among patients who underwent a baseline DXA scan and continued AI for 3 years, 28.0% had a repeat DXA scan within 2 years and 65.9% within 3 years. In aggregate, of the 1,164 patients who continued with AI treatment for 3 years, only 34.5% had both a baseline and at least one DXA scan during the 3-year follow-up period. Conclusion: The majority of older Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer treated with AIs do not undergo appropriate bone mineral density evaluation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document