scholarly journals A comparison of extreme precipitation event frequency and magnitude using a high‐resolution rain gage network and NOAA Atlas 14 across Delaware

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 3748-3756
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Leathers ◽  
Saber E. Brasher ◽  
Kevin R. Brinson ◽  
Christopher Hughes ◽  
Sam Weiskopf
2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 5385-5393 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Janssen ◽  
R. L. Sriver ◽  
D. J. Wuebbles ◽  
K. E. Kunkel

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Moore ◽  
C. Wilson ◽  
S. Bell

Abstract. Between 18:00UTC on Friday 9th November and 12:00UTC on Saturday 10th November 2001 260mm of rainfall was recorded at Bouzareah, compared to the November average of just 96mm. This extreme rainfall resulted in landslides and flooding, causing immense damage to the Bab-el-Oued district of Algiers and affected the lives of more than 2000 people. In this paper, key results from a modelling study of this event using the UK Met Office Unified Model at global (60km), regional (20km) and national (4km) horizontal resolutions are described. In general, it is found that the event could be well forecast with increases in resolution leading to better predictions of both the distribution and intensity of the rainfall. The role of the local orography and latent heating are also discussed.


Ecosphere ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. art172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy L. Concilio ◽  
Janet S. Prevéy ◽  
Peter Omasta ◽  
James O'Connor ◽  
Jesse B. Nippert ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (20) ◽  
pp. 2335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yabin Gou ◽  
Haonan Chen ◽  
Jiafeng Zheng

Polarimetric radar provides more choices and advantages for quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) than single-polarization radar. Utilizing the C-band polarimetric radar in Hangzhou, China, six radar QPE estimators based on the horizontal reflectivity (ZH), specific attenuation (AH), specific differential phase (KDP), and double parameters that further integrate the differential reflectivity (ZDR), namely, R(ZH, ZDR), R(KDP, ZDR), and R(AH, ZDR), are investigated for an extreme precipitation event that occurred in Eastern China on 1 June 2016. These radar QPE estimators are respectively evaluated and compared with a local rain gauge network and drop size distribution data observed by two disdrometers. The results show that (i) although R(AH, ZDR) underestimates in the light rain scenario, it performs the best among all radar QPE estimators according to the normalized mean error; (ii) the optimal radar rainfall relationship and consistency between radar measurements aloft and their surface counterparts are both required to obtain accurate rainfall estimates close to the ground. The contamination from melting layer on AH and KDP can make R(AH), R(AH, ZDR), R(KDP), and R(KDP, ZDR) less effective than R(ZH) and R(ZH,ZDR). Instead, adjustments of the α coefficient can partly reduce such impact and hence render a superior AH–based rainfall estimator; (iii) each radar QPE estimator may outperform others during some time intervals featured by particular rainfall characteristics, but they all tend to underestimate rainfall if radar fails to capture the rapid development of rainstorms.


2017 ◽  
Vol 441 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huailiang Wang ◽  
Zhuhai Shao ◽  
Tao Gao ◽  
Tao Zou ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document