The effect of other orientation on self–supervisor rating agreement

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 873-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Audrey Korsgaard ◽  
Bruce M. Meglino ◽  
Scott W. Lester
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Chun Chung ◽  
Jen-Ho Chang ◽  
Yi-Cheng Lin ◽  
Chin-Lan Huang

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 36-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwin A. Schmidl

Geographically, Austria's position during the Cold War differed significantly from that of Switzerland or Sweden, let alone Ireland. Austria, like Finland, was situated along the Iron Curtain. In 1945, Austria was divided between East and West, and the Soviet Union hoped that the Austrian Communists could quickly gain power by largely democratic means. This effort failed, however, when the Communists lost decisively in the November 1945 elections. Over the next decade, Austria remained under Soviet and Western military occupation. The formal adoption of a neutral status for Austria in May 1955, when the Austrian State Treaty was signed, was a compromise needed to ensure the departure of Soviet forces from Austria. Although some other orientation might have been preferred, neutrality over time became firmly engrained in Austria's collective identity.


2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 829-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott W. Lester ◽  
Bruce M. Meglino ◽  
M. Audrey Korsgaard

Genetics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 1053-1059
Author(s):  
L G Robbins ◽  
E E Swanson

Abstract Rex-induced mitotic recombination was used to determine whether nucleolus organizers can pair in both inverted and noninverted orientations. Two target chromosomes, each duplicated for the rDNA region, were exposed to maternal Rex activity. Recombination in one orientation should yield deletion of the material between the two nucleolus organizers, recombination in the other orientation should yield inversion of the same material. Both products were recovered from both target chromosomes. The generality of using Rex-mediated recombination for analysis of the rDNA is considered.


1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Fleenor ◽  
Cynthia D. McCauley ◽  
Stéphane Brutus

Author(s):  
Adrian Furnham

This chapter explores the meaning of, and implications for, differences in 360 Feedback ratings among individual raters (e.g., self, peers, direct reports). This chapter looks at possible causes and consequences for high and low agreement and why it is important. A detailed discussion of the history of rating difference research is followed by an analysis of these differences. This chapter addresses a number of issues related to congruity in feedback ratings: What is rater congruence? Why does it matter? Is it mainly due to people overrating themselves? What are the business implications for high or low congruence? What are the recommendations to increase it? The importance of self-other rating agreement in 360 Feedback is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document