scholarly journals Rate‐dependent and unidirectional conduction block between the left pulmonary vein and left atrium after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1096-1099
Author(s):  
Maki Oi ◽  
Shinnosuke Nomura ◽  
Mitsunori Miho ◽  
Takayasu Kobayashi ◽  
Marie Okabayashi ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 52-55
Author(s):  
Adi Lador ◽  
Miguel Valderrábano

Catheter ablation has become a cornerstone treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation is the accepted approach for paroxysmal AF ablation, but it is less effective for persistent AF. The vein of Marshall (VOM) is located in the epicardial left atrium and can be a source of AF triggers as well as a tract for autonomic nerves. It directly communicates with the underlying myocardium, including the left atrial ridge and the posterior mitral isthmus. This review discusses the latest evidence regarding the mechanisms, procedural aspects, and outcomes of VOM ethanol infusion when used as an adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent AF.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
kiyotake Ishikawa ◽  
Yukihiko Yoshida ◽  
Sumio Morita ◽  
Kenji Furusawa ◽  
Noriyoshi Kanemura ◽  
...  

Background: Left atrium (LA) dilation plays an important role in development and persistence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Some cases show structural reverse remodeling of LA after catheter ablation of AF. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of LA reverse remodeling. Method and Results: Echocardiographic data before and after ablation was obtained in 173 cases who underwent pulmonary vein isolation from January 2006 to April 2008 (74.0% men, 61.0±11 years old; paroxysmal AF 114, persistent AF 34, permanent AF 25). Mean atrial diameter before ablation was 39.0±6.1mm (paroxysmal 37.7±5.6mm, persistent 40.7±5.3mm, and permanent 43.0±6.8mm) and LA reverse remodeling was defined as 10% decrement of LA transverse diameter. Half of the cases were taking anti-arrhythmic drugs after ablation, and AF recurrence occurred in 16.8% (29/173) during mean follow up period of 8.5±6.3 months. Reverse remodeling of LA was seen in 34.1% (59/173) and AF recurrence rate in this group was 11.9% (7/59), whereas 19.3% (22/114) without reverse remodeling (P=0.29). However, limited in patients with LA diameter over 40mm (44.5%; 77/173), 3.2% (1/31) of AF recurrence was seen in those with reverse remodeling, while 21.7% (10/46) without reverse remodeling (P=0.04). LA reverse remodeling was observed significantly frequent in patients without history of hypertension(41.5% without hypertension vs 25.6% with hypertension, P=0.036). Conclusion: LA reverse remodeling after catheter ablation of AF in dilated LA patient is a simple and useful predictor for non-recurrence of AF. Hypertension could be a disturbance for LA reverse remodeling.


EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kettering

Abstract Background Catheter ablation has become the first line of therapy in patients with symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation is still the standard approach in these patients. However, the results are not very favourable and more complex ablation strategies are the subject of current controversy. Therefore, we have evaluated the effect of an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium on the long-term outcome. Methods A total of 220 patients (114 men, 106 women; mean age 69 years (SD ± 14 years)) with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation underwent a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation procedure in combination with an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group A). After discharge, patients were scheduled for repeated visits at the arrhythmia clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and 102 months after the ablation procedure. The long-term follow-up data was compared to 220 patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein ablation without an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group B). Results The ablation procedure could be performed as planned in all patients. Fifty-one out of 220 patients (23.2 %) in group A and 53 out of 220 patients (24.1 %) in group B experienced an arrhythmia recurrence within the first 3 months after ablation requiring an electrical cardioversion. At 102-month follow-up, analysis of a 168-hour ECG recording revealed no evidence for an arrhythmia recurrence in 125/220 patients (56.8 %) in group A and in 103/220 patients (46.8 %) in group B. In 66/220 patients (30.0 %) in group A and 59/220 patients (26.8 %) in group B, only short episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were documented. In 29 patients (13.2 %) in group A, a recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation (> 48 hours) was revealed by the long-term recordings (group B: 58 patients (26.4 %)). The lower arrhythmia recurrence rate in group A was partially due to a lower incidence of atypical atrial flutter after catheter ablation. The rate of repeat ablation procedures was significantly lower in group A than in group B. There were no major complications. Conclusions Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation comprising a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation and an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium provides more favourable results than circumferential pulmonary vein ablation alone. The effect is more pronounced during long-term than during short-term follow-up.


Author(s):  
kohei sawasaki ◽  
natsuko hosoya ◽  
masahiro muto

The patient was an 18-year-old man who suffered frequent supraventricular premature complexes (SVPCs) and atrial fibrillation. Catheter ablation was performed and left pulmonary vein had been isolated, although firing from within the left inferior pulmonary vein remained. After that, the patient did not exhibit SVPCs and atrial fibrillation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 170-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Daniel Ramirez ◽  
Vivek Y. Reddy ◽  
Raju Viswanathan ◽  
Mélèze Hocini ◽  
Pierre Jaïs

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Electrically isolating the pulmonary veins from the left atrium by catheter ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy for maintaining sinus rhythm, but its success varies depending on multiple factors, including arrhythmic burden. Although procedural outcomes have improved over the years, further gains are limited by a seemingly zero-sum relationship between effectiveness and safety, which is largely a product of the available technologies. Current energies used to create contiguous, transmural, and durable atrial lesions can result in serious complications if they reach the esophagus or phrenic nerve, for instance—structures that can be adjacent to the atrial myocardium, often within millimeters of the energy source. Consequently, high rates of pulmonary vein-left atrium reconnections are consistently seen in clinical studies and in clinical practice as operators appropriately forgo ablation effectiveness to protect patients from harm. However, as ablative technologies evolve to circumvent this stalemate, safer, and more effective pulmonary vein isolation seems increasingly realistic. Furthermore, the innovative nature of these technologies raises the prospect of markedly improved procedural efficiency, which could increase patient comfort, reduce operator occupational injuries, and enhance the use of health resources—all of which are increasingly important considerations particularly as the demand for catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation continues to rise. We herein review 3 promising candidate ablation technologies with the potential to revolutionize the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: electroporation (pulsed-field ablation), expandable lattice-tip radiofrequency ablation/electroporation, and ultra-low temperature cryoablation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document