Effects of somatosensory cortical stimulation on expression of c-Fos in rat medullary dorsal horn in response to formalin-induced noxious stimulation

2002 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fusami Gojyo ◽  
Shinichi Sugiyo ◽  
Ryotaro Kuroda ◽  
Atsufumi Kawabata ◽  
Vidya Varathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Cortical Stimulation ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn

The modulation of sensory transmission through the medullary dorsal horn during cortically driven mastication

1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 999-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joong Soo Kim ◽  
M. Catherine Bushnell ◽  
Gary H. Duncan ◽  
James P. Lund
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Unit Activity ◽  
Sensorimotor Cortex ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Cortical Stimulation ◽  
Motor Nucleus ◽  
Trigeminal Motor Nucleus ◽  
Sensory Transmission ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Low Threshold

During mastication, reflexes are modulated and sensory transmission is altered in interneurons and ascending pathways of the rostral trigeminal sensory complex. The current experiment examines the modulation of sensory transmission through the most caudal part of the trigeminal sensory system, the medullary dorsal horn, during fictive mastication produced by cortical stimulation. Extracellular single unit activity was recorded from the medullary dorsal horn, and multiple unit activity was recorded from the trigeminal motor nucleus in anesthetized, paralyzed rabbits. The masticatory area of sensorimotor cortex was stimulated to produce rhythmic activity in the trigeminal motor nucleus (fictive mastication). Activity in the dorsal horn was compared in the presence and absence of cortical stimulation. Fifty-two percent of neurons classified as low threshold and 83% of neurons receiving noxious inputs were influenced by cortical stimulation. The cortical effects were mainly inhibitory, but 21% of wide dynamic range and 6% of low threshold cells were excited by cortical stimulation. The modulation produced by cortical stimulation, whether inhibitory or excitatory, was not phasically related to the masticatory cycle. It is likely that, when masticatory movements are commanded by the sensorimotor cortex, the program includes tonic changes in sensory transmission through the medullary dorsal horn.

Structure-function relationships in rat medullary and cervical dorsal horns. II. Medullary dorsal horn cells

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 1187-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. E. Renehan ◽  
M. F. Jacquin ◽  
R. D. Mooney ◽  
R. W. Rhoades
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Medial Lemniscus ◽  
Guard Hair ◽  
Primary Afferent ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Low Threshold

In Nembutal-anesthetized rats, 31 physiologically identified medullary dorsal horn (MDH) cells were labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Ten responded only to deflection of one or more vibrissae. Six cells were activated by guard hair movement only, six by deflection of guard hairs or vibrissa(e), and seven by pinch of facial skin with serrated forceps. Different classes of low-threshold cells could not be distinguished on the basis of their somadendritic morphologies or laminar distribution. Neurons activated by multiple vibrissae were unique, however, in that one sent its axon into the medial lemniscus, and three projected into the trigeminal spinal tract. None of the guard hair-only or vibrissae-plus-guard hair neurons had such projections. Cells that responded best to noxious stimulation were located mainly in laminae I, II, and deep V, while neurons activated by vibrissa(e) and/or guard hair deflection were located in layers III, IV, and superficial V. Low-threshold neurons generally had fairly thick dendrites with few spines, whereas high-threshold cells tended to have thinner dendrites with numerous spines. Moreover, the dendritic arbors of low-threshold cells were, for the most part, denser than those of the noxious cells. Neurons with mandibular receptive fields were located in the dorsomedial portion of the MDH; cells with ophthalmic fields were found in the ventrolateral MDH, and maxillary cells were interposed. Cells sensitive to deflection of dorsal mystacial vibrissae and/or guard hairs were located ventral to those activated by more ventral hairs. Neurons with rostral receptive fields were found in the rostral MDH, while cells activated by hairs of the caudal mystacial pad, periauricular, and periorbital regions were located in the caudal MDH. Receptive-field types were encountered that have not been reported for trigeminal primary afferent neurons: multiple vibrissae; vibrissae plus guard hairs; and wide dynamic range. The latter two can be explained by the convergence of different primary afferent types onto individual neurons. Our failure to find a significant relationship between dendritic area (in the transverse plane) and the number of vibrissae suggests that primary afferent convergence may not be responsible for the synthesis of the multiple vibrissae receptive field. Excitatory connections between MDH neurons may, therefore, account for multiple vibrissae receptive fields in the MDH.

Acetaminophen Inhibits Spinal Prostaglandin E2Release after Peripheral Noxious Stimulation 

1999 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uta S. Muth-Selbach ◽  
Irmgard Tegeder ◽  
Kay Brune ◽  
Gerd Geisslinger
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Urinary Excretion ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Formalin Test ◽  
Intraperitoneal Administration ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Cyclooxygenase Inhibitor ◽  
Nociceptive Processing ◽  
Pge2 Release

Background Prostaglandin play a pivotal role in spinal nociceptive processing. At therapeutic concentrations, acetaminophen is not a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. inhibitor. Thus, it is antinociceptive without having antiinflammatory or gastrointestinal toxic effects. This study evaluated the role of spinal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in antinociception produced by intraperitoneally administered acetaminophen. Methods The PGE2 concentrations in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord were measured after formalin was injected into the hind paw of rats. The effect of antinociceptive doses of acetaminophen (100, 200, and 300 mg/kg given intraperitoneally) on PGE2 levels and flinching behavior was monitored Spinal PGE2 and acetaminophen concentrations were obtained by microdialysis using a probe that was implanted transversely through the dorsal horn of the spinal cord at L4. Furthermore, the effects of acetaminophen on urinary prostaglandin excretion were determined. Results Intraperitoneal administration of acetaminophen resulted in a significant decrease in spinal PGE2 release that was associated with a significant reduction in the flinching behavior in the formalin test Acetaminophen was distributed rapidly into the spinal cord with maximum dialysate concentrations 4560 min after intraperitoneal administration. Urinary excretion of prostanoids (PGE2, PGF2alpha, and 6-keto-PGF1alpha) was not significantly altered after acetaminophen administration. Conclusions The data confirm the importance of PGE2 in spinal nociceptive processing. The results suggest that antinociception after acetaminophen administration is mediated, at least in part, by inhibition of spinal PGE2 release. The mechanism, however, remains unknown. The finding that urinary excretion of prostaglandins was not affected might explain why acetaminophen is antinociceptive but does not compromise renal safety.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document