scholarly journals The effect of imaging modality (magnetic resonance imaging vs. computed tomography) and patient position (supine vs. prone) on target and organ at risk doses in partial breast irradiation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Brown ◽  
Kylie Dundas ◽  
Yolanda Surjan ◽  
Daniela Miller ◽  
Karen Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Partial Breast Irradiation ◽  
Breast Irradiation ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Patient Position ◽  
Organ At Risk

scholarly journals Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Computed Tomography in the Assessment for Acute Skull Fractures in a Canine and Feline Cadaver Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silke Hecht ◽  
Kimberly M. Anderson ◽  
Aude Castel ◽  
John F. Griffin ◽  
Adrien-Maxence Hespel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Head Trauma ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Small Animal ◽  
Skull Fractures ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mri Sequences

Computed tomography (CT) is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate patients with acute head trauma. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be chosen in select cases. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement of MRI with CT in the assessment for presence or absence of acute skull fractures in a canine and feline cadaver model, compare seven different MRI sequences (T1-W, T2-W, T2-FLAIR, PD-W, T2*-W, “SPACE” and “VIBE”), and determine agreement of four different MRI readers with CT data. Pre- and post-trauma CT and MRI studies were performed on 10 canine and 10 feline cadaver heads. Agreement of MRI with CT as to presence or absence of a fracture was determined for 26 individual osseous structures and four anatomic regions (cranium, face, skull base, temporomandibular joint). Overall, there was 93.5% agreement in assessing a fracture as present or absent between MRI and CT, with a significant difference between the pre and post trauma studies (99.4 vs. 87.6%; p < 0.0001; OR 0.042; 95% CI 0.034–0.052). There was no significant difference between dogs and cats. The agreement for the different MRI sequences with CT ranged from 92.6% (T2*-W) to 94.4% (PD-W). There was higher agreement of MRI with CT in the evaluation for fractures of the face than other anatomic regions. Agreement with CT for individual MRI readers ranged from 92.6 to 94.7%. A PD-W sequence should be added to the MR protocol when evaluating the small animal head trauma patient.

Detection of Wooden Foreign Bodies in Muscle Tissue: Experimental Comparison of Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Ultrasonography

1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 437-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark S. Mizel ◽  
Neil D. Steinmetz ◽  
Elly Trepman
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Muscle Tissue ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Experimental Comparison ◽  
Imaging Method ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Ct And Mri

An experimental study was performed to compare computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and real-time, high resolution ultrasonography (US) for the detection of wooden foreign bodies in muscle tissue. Wooden splinters were prepared, measured for size, soaked in saline, and placed in porcine muscle distant from and adjacent to bone. The specimens were then examined using roentgenography, CT and MRI in planes parallel and perpendicular to the splinters, and US. The largest wooden foreign bodies (minimum smallest width = 10 mm) were easily detected by CT, MRI, and US. Almost all splinters of various sizes, small and large, soaked in saline for 5 months were easily detected by MRI. Smaller splinters (minimum smallest width = 1–4 mm) soaked for only 3 days and placed distant from bone were most easily detected by US; those soaked for 5 months were most easily detected by either US or MRI. The smaller splinters soaked for only 3 days and placed near bone were not reliably detected by any of the imaging methods; CT and MRI were both more sensitive than US in this situation. MRI scanning was more sensitive perpendicular than parallel to the long axis of the splinters. Therefore, either US or MRI may be the best initial imaging modality for evaluation of a suspected wooden foreign body, depending on availability of imaging method, chronicity of symptoms, and proximity to bone.

Computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging for pre-operative planning for inverted nasal papilloma: review of evidence

2009 ◽  
Vol 123 (7) ◽  
pp. 705-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
P D Karkos ◽  
L C Khoo ◽  
S C Leong ◽  
H Lewis-Jones ◽  
A C Swift
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Inverted Papilloma ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Recurrent Tumour ◽  
Computed Tomography Scanning ◽  
Operative Planning ◽  
Inverted Nasal Papilloma

AbstractBackground:Inverted nasal papilloma is a benign tumour with variable biological behaviour. It is a unique neoplasm and is often difficult to manage, being characterised by a tendency to recur following excision, an association with malignancy and an ability to destroy bone. Radiological diagnosis has traditionally been based on computed tomography, but it is often impossible to differentiate between polyps with entrapped debris and inverted nasal papilloma. Magnetic resonance imaging, especially T2-weighted images, is perhaps a better tool in differentiating inverted nasal papilloma from other nasal lesions, and has recently been advocated as the imaging modality of choice.Aims:To review the evidence on the ideal imaging modality for pre-operative planning of surgery for patients with histologically proven inverted nasal papilloma.Materials and methods:A systematic review of studies was undertaken, focusing on radiological assessment of inverted nasal papilloma (primary and recurrent). All English language articles were potentially included in the review. However, we excluded single case reports, case series, pictorial essays, ‘teaching’ reviews and reviews of inverted nasal papilloma not focusing on pre-operative imaging.Results:Sixteen studies were identified based on our search strategy. Only 10 fulfilled our criteria. Computed tomography scanning was the standard imaging modality of choice for assessing sinus involvement of inverted papilloma and for planning the extent of surgery. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were able to distinguish tumour (intermediate signal) from inflammatory tissues (bright signal), but not post-operative scarring from recurrent tumour. No studies were found which compared the specificity and sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the accurate pre-operative identification of the extent of inverted papilloma.Conclusions:There is currently not enough evidence to suggest one sole modality as providing optimum imaging for inverted nasal papilloma. Computed tomography remains the imaging modality of first choice for inverted nasal papilloma, despite certain disadvantages. Magnetic resonance imaging is able to distinguish tumour from inflammation and is advocated as a better tool for recurrent tumour, but bone destruction of sinus walls is less easy to recognise, compared with computed tomography. Evaluation of sinus tumours usually involves both imaging modalities, and inverted nasal papilloma should be included within this pathological group. The cohort of patients is usually small, so cost-effectiveness should not generally be an issue when considering whether to use computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or both. A well structured, prospective study is needed to evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for pre-operative planning of histologically proven inverted nasal papilloma.

scholarly journals Modern Imaging Modalities in the Assessment of Acute Stroke

Folia Medica ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dora K. Zlatareva ◽  
Nikoleta I. Traykova
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Brain Tissue ◽  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Imaging Modalities ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Resonance Imaging

Abstract The AIM of this review was to present the modern concepts of diagnostic imaging in acute stroke. Neuroimaging in acute stroke aims at diagnosing the condition as early as possible and assessing the extent of parenchymal perfusion and the intracranial vessels patency. A modern approach would involve a combination of various imaging modalities as multidetector computed tomography and high field magnetic resonance imaging. A non-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is used to detect hemorrhage or to identify early signs of ischemic stroke. CT angiography finds evidence of intravascular thrombi or significant stenoses, and CT perfusion displays brain tissue at risk of irreversible alterations that can be salvaged therapeutically. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a more sensitive modality than CT in diagnosing acute brain ischemia. MR diffusion-weighted imaging is more sensitive than conventional MR sequences in hyperacute stage. MR angiography as a non-invasive and non-ionizing imaging method is used as an alternative modality to CT angiography. To find brain tissue at risk diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging modalities are used. The authors present briefly the modern neuroimaging modalities used in patients with transient ischemic attack, minor stroke and venous infarction. By combining different imaging techniques in a multimodal approach we can acquire the information necessary for therapeutic planning and differentiate patients who need thrombolysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document