Diagnostic Performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2017 Versus Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Comparative Studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeun‐Yoon Kim ◽  
Sunyoung Lee ◽  
Jaeseung Shin ◽  
Won Jeong Son ◽  
Hyejung Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Data System ◽  
Liver Imaging

Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1488-1497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunyoung Lee ◽  
Seung‐Seob Kim ◽  
Yun Ho Roh ◽  
Jin‐Young Choi ◽  
Mi‐Suk Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Data System ◽  
Liver Imaging

CT and MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1199-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunyoung Lee ◽  
Yeun-Yoon Kim ◽  
Jaeseung Shin ◽  
Shin Hye Hwang ◽  
Yun Ho Roh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Data System ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Ct And Mri

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Zhou ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Linyao Du ◽  
Jiapeng Jiang ◽  
Qing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Data System ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Sensitivity Range ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Objectives To determine the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system (CEUS-LI-RADS) for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients. Methods In this prospective study, CEUS-LI-RADS categories (LR-5 for predicting HCC) were assigned by six blinded readers and compared to the definitive HCC diagnosis in patients with liver cirrhosis per the 2017 China Liver Cancer Guidelines (CLCG). CEUS features were recorded in 96 patients with 96 histology-proven lesions. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 was described by the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Multi-reader agreement was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results In cirrhotic patients, the specificity of LR-5 (range: 92.7–100.0 %) was statistically higher than that of CLCG for each reader (range: 28.6–64.3 %). However, the sensitivity (range: 38.6–63.6 %) and accuracy (range: 53.4–70.7 %) were statistically lower in CEUS-LIRADS than in CLCG (sensitivity range: 88.6–100.0 %; accuracy range: 77.6–86.2 %). Only fair to moderate inter-reader agreement was achieved for the CEUS-LI-RADS category (ICC = 0.595) and washout appearance (ICC range: 0.338 to 0.555). Neither nodule-in-nodule nor mosaic architecture was observed more often in HCC (all P > 0.05), with poor inter-reader consistency for both (both ICC < 0.20). Conclusion CEUS-LI-RADS category 5 has a high specificity but a low accuracy for identifying HCC in high-risk patients. Inter-reader agreement is not satisfactory concerning CEUS-LIRADS category and washout appearance. Moreover, the clinical value of ancillary features favoring HCC is quite limited.

Liver imaging reporting and data system category M: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1477-1487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hwan Kim ◽  
Sang Hyun Choi ◽  
Seong Ho Park ◽  
Kyung Won Kim ◽  
Jae Ho Byun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Data System ◽  
Liver Imaging
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document