scholarly journals Editorial on "ACR Guidance Document on MR Safe Practices: Updates and Critical Information 2019"

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-340
Author(s):  
David Jordan ◽  
Vikas Gulani
Keyword(s):  
Guidance Document ◽  
Critical Information ◽  
Mr Safe ◽  
Safe Practices

scholarly journals ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: Updates and critical information 2019

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Todd D. Greenberg ◽  
Michael N. Hoff ◽  
Tobias B. Gilk ◽  
Edward F. Jackson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Guidance Document ◽  
Critical Information ◽  
Mr Safe ◽  
Safe Practices

scholarly journals ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Emanuel Kanal ◽  
A. James Barkovich ◽  
Charlotte Bell ◽  
James P. Borgstede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Guidance Document ◽  
Mr Safe ◽  
Safe Practices

Lessons learned: Designing the forest biorefinery

TAPPI Journal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 609-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRÉDÉRIC CLERC ◽  
VIRGINIE CHAMBOST ◽  
PAUL STUART
Keyword(s):  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Green Bay ◽  
Critical Information ◽  
Critical Results

The objective of this TAPPI JOURNAL (TJ) special feature is to synthesize critical information and take-away messages from the 2013 TAPPI Biorefinery Design Course in Green Bay, WI, USA, based on the presentations made, as well as discussions between participants and experts. The content of this feature was developed based on notes taken during the course; synthesis of critical information; identification of some critical results and figures included here; and identification of key messages that may be useful to TJ readers.

On "Diversity" as Anti-Racism in Library and Information Studies: A Critique

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David James Hudson
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Competence ◽  
Dominant Mode ◽  
Specific Exercise ◽  
Critical Information ◽  
Racial Formations ◽  
Library And Information Studies ◽  
Information Studies ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
Diversity Discourse

Drawing on a range of critical race and anti-colonial writing, and focusing chiefly on Anglo-Western contexts of librarianship, this paper offers a broad critique of diversity as the dominant mode of anti-racism in LIS. After outlining diversity's core tenets, I examine the ways in which the paradigm's centering of inclusion as a core anti-racist strategy has tended to inhibit meaningful treatment of racism as a structural phenomenon. Situating LIS diversity as a liberal anti-racism, I then turn to diversity's tendency to privilege individualist narratives of (anti-)racism, particularly narratives of cultural competence, and the intersection of such individualism with broader structures of political-economic domination. Diversity's preoccupation with demographic inclusion and individual behavioural competence has, I contend, left little room in the field for substantive engagement with race as a historically contingent phenomenon: race is ultimately reified through LIS diversity discourse, effectively precluding exploration of the ways in which racial formations are differentially produced in the contextually-specific exercise of power itself. I argue that an LIS foregrounding of race as a historical construct - the assumption of its contingency - would enable deeper inquiry into the complex ways in which our field - and indeed the diversity paradigm specifically - aligns with the operations of contemporary regimes of racial subordination in the first place. I conclude with a reflection on the importance of the Journal of Critical Information and Library Studies as a potential site of critical exchange from which to articulate a sustained critique of race in and through our field.

Ensuring the security of critical information infrastructure: the powers of the federal government bodies of the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilia Pavlovich Mikhnev ◽  
Svetlana Vladimirovna Mikhneva
Keyword(s):  
Information Security ◽  
Federal Government ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Information Infrastructure ◽  
Critical Information ◽  
Security Service ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
Computer Attacks ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article discusses the competences and powers of the state authorities of the Russian Federation within their legal status in the field of ensuring the security of critical information infrastructure. Some functions and authorities in the field of information security have changed in a number of federal executive bodies. In particular, the Federal Security Service, on the basis of a presidential decree, is authorized to create a state system for detecting, preventing and eliminating the consequences of computer attacks on information resources of the Russian Federation. However, not all rights and obligations are enshrined; a number of powers cause the duality of the legal status of certain federal bodies of state power. The clarity and unambiguity of securing the rights and obligations of state bodies authorized in the field of information security are guarantees for effectively ensuring the security of important information infrastructure facilities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document