Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1358-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Li ◽  
Tao Yu ◽  
Lyu Li ◽  
Lunbo Lu ◽  
Yaoyao Zhuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Tumors ◽  
Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging ◽  
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Mri ◽  
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Enhanced Mri ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Diffusion Kurtosis ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Mri

scholarly journals Diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of parotid gland tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Huang ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Dejun She ◽  
Zhen Xing ◽  
Tanhui Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parotid Gland ◽  
Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Mri ◽  
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Parotid Gland Tumors ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Diffusion Kurtosis ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Mri

Abstract Objective To assess the usefulness of combined diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in the differentiation of parotid gland tumors. Methods Seventy patients with 80 parotid gland tumors who underwent DKI and DCE-MRI were retrospectively enrolled and divided into four groups: pleomorphic adenomas (PAs), Warthin tumors (WTs), other benign tumors (OBTs), and malignant tumors (MTs). DCE-MRI and DKI quantitative parameters were measured. The Kruskal–Wallis H test and post hoc test with Bonferroni correction and ROC curve were used for statistical analysis. Results WTs demonstrated the highest Kep value (median 1.89, interquartile range [1.46–2.31] min−1) but lowest Ve value (0.20, [0.15–0.25]) compared with PAs (Kep, 0.34 [0.21–0.55] min−1; Ve, 0.36 [0.24–0.43]), OBTs (Kep, 1.22 [0.27–1.67] min−1; Ve, 0.28 [0.25–0.41]), and MTs (Kep, 0.71 [0.50–1.23] min−1; Ve, 0.35 [0.26–0.45]) (all p < .05). MTs had the lower D value (1.10, [0.88–1.29] × 10−3 mm2/s) compared with PAs (1.81, [1.60–2.20] × 10−3 mm2/s) and OBTs (1.57, [1.32–1.89] × 10−3 mm2/s) (both p < .05). PAs had the lower Ktrans value (0.12, [0.07–0.18] min−1) compared with OBTs (0.28, [0.11–0.50] min−1) (p < .05). The cutoff values of combined Kep and Ve, D, and Ktrans to distinguish WTs, MTs, and PAs sequentially were 1.06 min−1, 0.28, 1.46 × 10−3 mm2/s, and 0.21 min−1, respectively (accuracy, 89% [71/80], 91% [73/80], 78% [62/80], respectively). Conclusion The combined use of DKI and DCE-MRI may help differentiate parotid gland tumors. Key Points • The combined use of DKI and DCE-MRI could facilitate the understanding of the pathophysiological characteristics of parotid gland tumors. • A stepwise diagnostic diagram based on the combined use of DCE-MRI parameters and the diffusion coefficient is helpful for accurate preoperative diagnosis in parotid gland tumors and may further facilitate the clinical management of patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document