Analysis of the nucleotide content of Escherichia coli promoter sequences related to the alternative sigma factors

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. e2770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Dall'Alba ◽  
Pedro Lenz Casa ◽  
Daniel Luis Notari ◽  
Andre Gustavo Adami ◽  
Sergio Echeverrigaray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Sigma Factors ◽  
Promoter Sequences ◽  
Nucleotide Content ◽  
Alternative Sigma Factors ◽  
Coli Promoter

scholarly journals The evolutionary impact of Intragenic FliA Promoters in Proteobacteria

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon M. Fitzgerald ◽  
Carol Smith ◽  
Pascal Lapierre ◽  
Joseph T. Wade
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Sigma Factor ◽  
Sigma Factors ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Alternative Sigma Factors ◽  
Genome Scale ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Flagellar Genes

ABSTRACTRecent work has revealed that large numbers of promoters in bacteria are located inside genes. In contrast, almost all studies of transcription have focused on promoters upstream of genes. Bacterial promoters are recognized by Sigma factors that associate with initiating RNA polymerase. In Escherichia coli, one Sigma factor recognizes the majority of promoters, and six “alternative” Sigma factors recognize specific subsets of promoters. One of these alternative Sigma factors, FliA (σ28), recognizes promoters upstream of many flagellar genes. We previously showed that most E. coli FliA binding sites are located inside genes. However, it was unclear whether these intragenic binding sites represent active promoters. Here, we construct and assay transcriptional promoter-lacZ fusions for all 52 putative FliA promoters previously identified by ChIP-seq. These experiments, coupled with integrative analysis of published genome-scale transcriptional datasets, reveal that most intragenic FliA binding sites are active promoters that transcribe highly unstable RNAs. Additionally, we show that widespread intragenic FliA-dependent transcription is a conserved phenomenon, but that the specific promoters are not themselves conserved. We conclude that intragenic FliA-dependent promoters and the resulting RNAs are unlikely to have important regulatory functions. Nonetheless, one intragenic FliA promoter is broadly conserved, and constrains evolution of the overlapping protein-coding gene. Thus, our data indicate that intragenic regulatory elements can influence protein evolution in bacteria, and suggest that the impact of intragenic regulatory sequences on genome evolution should be considered more broadly.AUTHOR SUMMARYRecent genome-scale studies of bacterial transcription have revealed thousands of promoters inside genes. In a few cases, these promoters have been shown to transcribe functional RNAs. However, it is unclear whether most intragenic promoters have important biological function. Similarly, there are likely to be thousands of intragenic binding sites for transcription factors, but very few have been functionally characterized. Moreover, it is unclear what impact intragenic promoters and transcription factor binding sites have on evolution of the overlapping genes. In this study, we focus on FliA, a broadly conserved Sigma factor that is responsible for initiating transcription of many flagellar genes. We previously showed that FliA directs RNA polymerase to ~50 genomic sites in Escherichia coli. In our current study, we show that while most intragenic FliA promoters are actively transcribed, very few are conserved in other species. This suggests that most FliA promoters are not functional. Nonetheless, one intragenic FliA promoter is highly conserved, and we show that this promoter constrains evolution of the overlapping protein-coding gene. Given the enormous number of regulatory DNA sites within genes, we propose that the evolution of many genes is constrained by these elements.

scholarly journals Interactions between DksA and Stress-Responsive Alternative Sigma Factors Control Inorganic Polyphosphate Accumulation in Escherichia coli

2020 ◽  
Vol 202 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Nutrient Limitation ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Regulatory Protein ◽  
Sigma Factors ◽  
Inorganic Polyphosphate ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Alternative Sigma Factors

ABSTRACT Bacteria synthesize inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) in response to a variety of different stress conditions. polyP protects bacteria by acting as a protein-stabilizing chaperone, metal chelator, or regulator of protein function, among other mechanisms. However, little is known about how stress signals are transmitted in the cell to lead to increased polyP accumulation. Previous work in the model enterobacterium Escherichia coli has indicated that the RNA polymerase-binding regulatory protein DksA is required for polyP synthesis in response to nutrient limitation stress. In this work, I set out to characterize the role of DksA in polyP regulation in more detail. I found that overexpression of DksA increases cellular polyP content (explaining the long-mysterious phenotype of dksA overexpression rescuing growth of a dnaK mutant at high temperatures) and characterized the roles of known functional residues of DksA in this process, finding that binding to RNA polymerase is required but that none of the other functions of DksA appear to be necessary. Transcriptomics revealed genome-wide transcriptional changes upon nutrient limitation, many of which were affected by DksA, and follow-up experiments identified complex interactions between DksA and the stress-sensing alternative sigma factors FliA, RpoN, and RpoE that impact polyP production, indicating that regulation of polyP synthesis is deeply entwined in the multifactorial stress response network of E. coli. IMPORTANCE Inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) is an evolutionarily ancient, widely conserved biopolymer required for stress resistance and pathogenesis in diverse bacteria, but we do not understand how its synthesis is regulated. In this work, I gained new insights into this process by characterizing the role of the transcriptional regulator DksA in polyP regulation in Escherichia coli and identifying previously unknown links between polyP synthesis and the stress-responsive alternative sigma factors FliA, RpoN, and RpoE.

scholarly journals Complex interactions between DksA and stress-responsive alternative sigma factors control inorganic polyphosphate accumulation in Escherichia coli

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Nutrient Limitation ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Regulatory Protein ◽  
Sigma Factors ◽  
Inorganic Polyphosphate ◽  
Complex Interactions ◽  
Alternative Sigma Factors

ABSTRACTBacteria synthesize inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) in response to a variety of different stress conditions. PolyP protects bacteria by acting as a protein-stabilizing chaperone, metal chelator, or regulator of protein function, among other mechanisms. However, little is known about how stress signals are transmitted in the cell to lead to increased polyP accumulation. Previous work in the model enterobacterium Escherichia coli has indicated that the RNA polymerase-binding regulatory protein DksA is required for polyP synthesis in response to nutrient limitation stress. In this work, I set out to characterize the role of DksA in polyP regulation in more detail. I found that overexpression of DksA increases cellular polyP content (explaining the long-mysterious phenotype of dksA overexpression rescuing growth of a dnaK mutant at high temperature) and characterized the roles of known functional residues of DksA in this process, finding that binding to RNA polymerase is required, but none of the other functions of DksA appear to be necessary. Transcriptomics revealed genome-wide transcriptional changes upon nutrient limitation, many of which were affected by DksA, and follow-up experiments identified complex interactions between DksA and the stress-sensing alternative sigma factors FliA, RpoN, and RpoE that impact polyP production, indicating that regulation of polyP synthesis is deeply entwined in the multifactorial stress response network of E. coli.IMPORTANCEInorganic polyphosphate (polyP) is an evolutionarily ancient, widely conserved biopolymer required for stress resistance and pathogenesis in diverse bacteria, but we do not understand how its synthesis is regulated. In this work, I gained new insights into this process by characterizing the role of the transcriptional regulator DksA in polyP regulation in Escherichia coli and identifying previously unknown links between polyP synthesis and the stress-responsive alternative sigma factors FliA, RpoN, and RpoE.

scholarly journals Growth Phase-Dependent Regulation of the Extracytoplasmic Stress Factor, σE, by Guanosine 3′,5′-Bispyrophosphate (ppGpp)

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (13) ◽  
pp. 4627-4634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Costanzo ◽  
Sarah E. Ades
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Growth Phase ◽  
Sigma Factor ◽  
Sigma Factors ◽  
Alternative Sigma Factor ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Alternative Sigma Factors ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
Sigma Subunit

ABSTRACT The sigma subunit of procaryotic RNA polymerases is responsible for specific promoter recognition and transcription initiation. In addition to the major sigma factor, σ70, in Escherichia coli, which directs most of the transcription in the cell, bacteria possess multiple, alternative sigma factors that direct RNA polymerase to distinct sets of promoters in response to environmental signals. By activating an alternative sigma factor, gene expression can be rapidly reprogrammed to meet the needs of the cell as the environment changes. Sigma factors are subject to multiple levels of regulation that control their levels and activities. The alternative sigma factor σE in Escherichia coli is induced in response to extracytoplasmic stress. Here we demonstrate that σE can also respond to signals other than extracytoplasmic stress. σE activity increases in a growth phase-dependent manner as a culture enters stationary phase. The signaling pathway that activates σE during entry into stationary phase is dependent upon the alarmone guanosine 3′,5′-bispyrophosphate (ppGpp) and is distinct from the pathway that signals extracytoplasmic stress. ppGpp is the first cytoplasmic factor shown to control σE activity, demonstrating that σE can respond to internal signals as well as signals originating in the cell envelope. ppGpp is a general signal of starvation stress and is also required for activation of the σS and σ54 alternative sigma factors upon entry into stationary phase, suggesting that this is a key mechanism by which alternative sigma factors can be activated in concert to provide a coordinated response to nutritional stress.

scholarly journals Intracellular localization of the mycobacterial stressosome complex

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malavika Ramesh ◽  
Ram Gopal Nitharwal ◽  
Phani Rama Krishna Behra ◽  
B. M. Fredrik Pettersson ◽  
Santanu Dasgupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Fluorescence Microscopy ◽  
Bacillus Cereus ◽  
Intracellular Localization ◽  
Sigma Factors ◽  
Alternative Sigma Factors ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Molecular Machinery ◽  
Stress Signals ◽  
Activation Pathways

AbstractMicroorganisms survive stresses by alternating the expression of genes suitable for surviving the immediate and present danger and eventually adapt to new conditions. Many bacteria have evolved a multiprotein "molecular machinery" designated the "Stressosome" that integrates different stress signals and activates alternative sigma factors for appropriate downstream responses. We and others have identified orthologs of some of the Bacillus subtilis stressosome components, RsbR, RsbS, RsbT and RsbUVW in several mycobacteria and we have previously reported mutual interactions among the stressosome components RsbR, RsbS, RsbT and RsbUVW from Mycobacterium marinum. Here we provide evidence that "STAS" domains of both RsbR and RsbS are important for establishing the interaction and thus critical for stressosome assembly. Fluorescence microscopy further suggested co-localization of RsbR and RsbS in multiprotein complexes visible as co-localized fluorescent foci distributed at scattered locations in the M. marinum cytoplasm; the number, intensity and distribution of such foci changed in cells under stressed conditions. Finally, we provide bioinformatics data that 17 (of 244) mycobacteria, which lack the RsbRST genes, carry homologs of Bacillus cereus genes rsbK and rsbM indicating the existence of alternative σF activation pathways among mycobacteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document