A snapshot of the 2020 conception of anatomic liver resections and their applicability on minimally invasive liver surgery. A preparatory survey for the Expert Consensus Meeting on Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Ciria ◽  
Giammauro Berardi ◽  
Hitoe Nishino ◽  
Albert C.Y. Chan ◽  
Rawisak Chanwat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Consensus Meeting ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery ◽  
Liver Resections

scholarly journals Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirhasan Rahimli ◽  
Aristotelis Perrakis ◽  
Vera Schellerer ◽  
Andrew Gumbs ◽  
Eric Lorenz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery ◽  
Previous Abdominal Surgery

Abstract Background Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS) and robotic liver surgery (RLS). Methods Twenty-five patients with CRLM, who underwent MILS between May 2012 and March 2020, were selected from our retrospective registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Thirteen of these patients underwent LLS and 12 RLS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of both groups were analyzed. Results Operating time was significantly longer in the RLS vs. the LLS group (342.0 vs. 200.0 min; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic vs. the robotic group regarding length of postoperative stay (8.8 days), measured blood loss (430.4 ml), intraoperative blood transfusion, overall morbidity (20.0%), and liver surgery related morbidity (4%). The mean BMI was 27.3 (range from 19.2 to 44.8) kg/m2. The 30-day mortality was 0%. R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100.0%) in RLS vs. 10 patients (76.9%) in LLS. Major resections were carried out in 32.0% of the cases, and 84.0% of the patients showed intra-abdominal adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery. In 24.0% of cases, the tumor was bilobar, the maximum number of tumors removed was 9, and the largest tumor was 8.5 cm in diameter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84, 56.9, and 48.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall recurrence-free survival rates were 49.6 and 36.2%, respectively, without significant differences between RLS vs. LLS. Conclusion Minimally invasive liver surgery for CRLM is safe and feasible. Minimally invasive resection of multiple lesions and large tumors is also possible. RLS may help to achieve higher rates of R0 resections. High BMI, previous abdominal surgery, and bilobar tumors are not a barrier for MILS. Laparoscopic and robotic liver resections for CRLM provide similar long-term results which are comparable to open techniques.

scholarly journals Technical feasibility and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic isolated caudate lobe resection: an IgoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry-based study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ruzzenente ◽  
◽  
Andrea Ciangherotti ◽  
Luca Aldrighetti ◽  
Giuseppe Maria Ettorre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Caudate Lobe ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

Abstract Background Although isolated caudate lobe (CL) liver resection is not a contraindication for minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), feasibility and safety of the procedure are still poorly investigated. To address this gap, we evaluate data on the Italian prospective maintained database on laparoscopic liver surgery (IgoMILS) and compare outcomes between MILS and open group. Methods Perioperative data of patients with malignancies, as colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), non-colorectal liver metastases (NCRLM) and benign liver disease, were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the potential selection bias for MILS and open group. Results A total of 224 patients were included in the study, 47 and 177 patients underwent MILS and open isolated CL resection, respectively. The overall complication rate was comparable between the two groups; however, severe complication rate (Dindo–Clavien grade ≥ 3) was lower in the MILS group (0% versus 6.8%, P = ns). In-hospital mortality was 0% in both groups and mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MILS group (P = 0.01). After selection of 42 MILS and 43 open CL resections by PSM analysis, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes remained similar except for the hospital stay which was not significantly shorter in MILS group. Conclusions This multi-institutional cohort study shows that MILS CL resection is feasible and safe. The surgical procedure can be technically demanding compared to open resection, whereas good perioperative outcomes can be achieved in highly selected patients.

Minimally invasive liver surgery for metastases from colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome and prognostic factors

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 2288-2298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baki Topal ◽  
Joyce Tiek ◽  
Steffen Fieuws ◽  
Raymond Aerts ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Oncologic Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

scholarly journals Minimally invasive liver surgery: a field is maturing

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 34-34
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Sucher ◽  
Robert Sucher
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

Integrated MR-laparoscopy system with respiratory synchronization for minimally invasive liver surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 622-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Matsuoka ◽  
Etsuko Kumamoto ◽  
Maki Sugimoto ◽  
Takeshi Azuma ◽  
Akito Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery ◽  
Respiratory Synchronization
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document