Surgical approaches for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Ban ◽  
Giovanni Maria Garbarino ◽  
Yoshiya Ishikawa ◽  
Goro Honda ◽  
Jin‐Young Jang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Surgical Approaches

Precision vascular anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoe Nishino ◽  
Giuseppe Zimmitti ◽  
Takao Ohtsuka ◽  
Mohammed Abu Hilal ◽  
Brian K. P. Goh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Vascular Anatomy

scholarly journals Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Balduzzi ◽  
◽  
N. van der Heijde ◽  
A. Alseidi ◽  
S. Dokmak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Vascular Involvement ◽  
Patient Counseling ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose The reported conversion rates for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) range widely from 2 to 38%. The identification of risk factors for conversion may help surgeons during preoperative planning and patient counseling. Moreover, the impact of conversion on outcomes of MIDP is unknown. Methods A systematic review was conducted as part of the 2019 Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR). The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for studies concerning conversion to open surgery in MIDP. Results Of the 828 studies screened, eight met the eligibility criteria, resulting in a combined dataset including 2592 patients after MIDP. The overall conversion rate was 17.1% (range 13.0–32.7%) with heterogeneity between studies associated with the definition of conversion adopted. Only one study divided conversion into elective and emergency conversion. The main indications for conversion were vascular involvement (23.7%), concern for oncological radicality (21.9%), and bleeding (18.9%). The reported risk factors for conversion included a malignancy as an indication for surgery, the proximity of the tumor to vascular structures in preoperative imaging, higher BMI or visceral fat, and multi-organ resection or extended resection. Contrasting results were seen in terms of blood loss and length of stay in comparing converted MIDP and completed MIDP patients. Conclusion The identified risk factors for conversion from this study can be used for patient selection and counseling. Surgeon experience should be considered when contemplating MIDP for a complex patient. Future studies should divide conversion into elective and emergency conversion.

Minimally invasive preservation versus splenectomy during distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 476-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Nakata ◽  
Satoru Shikata ◽  
Takao Ohtsuka ◽  
Tomohiko Ukai ◽  
Yoshihiro Miyasaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis

Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery. A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
Edvin Selmani ◽  
Fatmir Brahimi ◽  
Leard Duraj ◽  
Valbona Selmani ◽  
Gjergji Syko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hallux Valgus
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document