scholarly journals Comparative study between sorafenib and lenvatinib as the first‐line therapy in the sequential treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in a real‐world setting

JGH Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taito Fukushima ◽  
Manabu Morimoto ◽  
Makoto Ueno ◽  
Kousuke Kubota ◽  
Haruki Uojima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Sequential Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Modeling sequential systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy: What comes next?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 324-324
Author(s):  
Ciro Celsa ◽  
Giuseppe Cabibbo ◽  
Marco Enea ◽  
Salvatore Battaglia ◽  
Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sequential Strategy

324 Background: Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab represents the new best performing first-line approach for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). However, the best sequential strategy after every first-line failure (for progression or intolerance) remains elusive, and options for retreating patients failing Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab with multi-kinase inhibitors (MKI) or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) are yet undefined. Methods: We developed a Markov model to analyze simulated-Overall Survival (s-OS) of second-line ICIs or MKIs after first-line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab over a lifetime horizon. For first-line therapy, PFS of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab was extracted from Imbrave 150 trial and it was used as endpoint since it is not influenced by post-progression survival. For second-line retreatment, pooled OS of MKIs (Regorafenib and Cabozantinib), or ICIs (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) were adopted. Survival estimates for sequential settings considered the proportion of patients who did not receive second-line therapy due to death during first-line therapy. Individual patient survival data were extracted from PFS and OS Kaplan-Meier curves of RESORCE trial for Regorafenib, CELESTIAL trial for Cabozantinib, CheckMate-040 for Nivolumab and Keynote-240 for Pembrolizumab. Each reconstructed survival curve was inspected for accuracy and was compared with originally published curves. Results: First-line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab followed by second-line ICIs turned on from the model as the best sequential strategy (median s-OS 24 months; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 23-26 months) and extends survival when compared Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab followed by MKIs (median s-OS 20 months; 95% CI 19-21 months). Conclusions: To our knowledge and given the absence of adequately designed sequential RCTs, this is the first model to date which suggests, with a proper methodological approach, an accurate estimate of outcome of patients with u-HCC treated by sequential systemic therapies. In patients with u-HCC failing first-line treatment, modelling estimates of s-OS for each retreatment strategies may assist in choosing the most promising sequences in order to plan appropriate RCTs.

scholarly journals Is There Still a Role for Endocrine Therapy Alone in HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients? Results from the Analysis of Two Data Sets of Patients Treated with High-Dose Fulvestrant as First-Line Therapy in the Real-World Setting: The EVA and GIM-13 AMBRA Studies

Breast Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Marina Elena Cazzaniga ◽  
Claudio Verusio ◽  
Mariangela Ciccarese ◽  
Alberto Fumagalli ◽  
Donata Sartori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Real World ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Line Therapy

Background: Different studies suggest that fulvestrant 500 mg every 28 days (HD-FUL) could be an active treatment in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients even treated with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. The aim of this analysis is to describe the outcome of ABC patients treated with HD-FUL as first-line treatment in terms of median duration of treatment and the overall response rate in a real-world setting. Methods: For the purpose of the present analysis, we considered two data sets of HR+ ABC patients collected in Italy between 2012 and 2015 (EVA and GIM-13 AMBRA studies). Results: Eighty-one and 91 patients have been identified from the two data sets. The median age was 63 years (range 35–82) for the EVA and 57.8 years (range 35.0–82.3) for the AMBRA patients. ORRs were 23.5 and 24.3% in the whole population, 26.9% in the patients with bone only, and 21.8 and 21.4% in those with visceral metastases. The median duration of HD-FUL was 11.6 months (range 1–48) and 12.4 months (range 2.9–70.0) in the two data sets, respectively. Conclusion: These data suggest that HD-FUL should still continue to play a significant role as first-line therapy in HR+ ABC patients.

Translating Results from VARSITY to Real World: Adalimumab vs Vedolizumab as First-line Biological in Moderate to Severe IBD

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annick Moens ◽  
Bram Verstockt ◽  
Dahham Alsoud ◽  
João Sabino ◽  
Marc Ferrante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Persistence ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Therapy Initiation ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Endoscopic Remission

Abstract Background Selecting a first-line therapy remains challenging in IBD. Adalimumab (ADM) and vedolizumab (VDZ) effectively lead to endoscopic remission in moderate to severe IBD. The VARSITY trial showed superiority of VDZ over ADM in ulcerative colitis (UC) regarding clinical remission and endoscopic improvement at week 52. We explored these results in a real-world setting of UC and Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods This retrospective study followed a cohort of biologic-naïve patients starting ADM or VDZ from 2015-2019. Patients had moderate to severe disease (endoscopic Mayo score ≥2 for UC, presence of ulcerations for CD) prior to therapy initiation. For UC, endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo score 0) and improvement (endoscopic Mayo score ≤1) at week 52 were assessed. For CD, endoscopic remission (absence of ulcerations) and improvement (markedly better endoscopy despite ulcerations) at weeks 26-52 were studied. Treatment persistence was also evaluated. Results In total, 195 biologic-naïve patients (109 UC; 86 CD) were included. In UC, VDZ was superior to ADM regarding endoscopic remission (29% vs 11%, P = .03), endoscopic improvement (51% vs 26%, P = .01) at week 52, and treatment persistence (P = .04). In CD, no differences in endoscopic remission (VDZ 48% vs ADM 60%; P=0.37), improvement (VDZ 76% vs ADM 77%; P = 1.00), or treatment persistence (P=0.43) at weeks 26-52 were seen. Safety profiles were similar in UC and CD. Conclusions This real-world cohort study of biologic-naïve IBD patients found VDZ to be superior to ADM as first-line treatment for patients with UC—but not CD—regarding endoscopic remission at week 52 and treatment persistence.

scholarly journals Lenvatinib as the key component of first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-148
Author(s):  
L. V. Bolotina
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
First Line Treatment

Throughout the last 10 years, liver cancer mortality rate in the Russian Federation consistently exceeded the morbidity rate, which is related to the complexity of early diagnostics, absence of effective screening and oncological alertness of allied-profession doctors. In the situation when late disease intelligence does not frequently allow radical treatment, palliative methods remain the only option of survivability enhancement and improving the patients quality of life. Lenvatinib was approved as the first-line drug in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma based on the data of the REFLECT trial, in which the drug demonstrated achieving the patients overall survival (OS) comparable to the activity of sorafenib (13.6 months for lenvatinib vs 12.3 months for sorafenib; hazard ratio HR 0.92; 95% confidence interval CI 0.791.06). At the same time, significant inferiority of lenvatinib was observed for secondary endpoints: progression-free survival PFS (7.4 months for lenvatinib vs 3.7 months for sorafenib; HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.570.77;р0.0001), time to progression (8.9 months for lenvatinib vs 3.7 months for sorafenib; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.530.73;р0.0001) and objective response rate ORR (24.1% for lenvatinib vs 9.2% for sorafenib). The further analysis of the results of the REFLECT study revealed the additional factors impacting patients survival, such as the level of a-fetoprotein (AFP) before treatment, treatment ORR, performance of subsequent antitumor therapy and procedures after completion of the target first-line therapy. In patients responding to lenvatinib in the first line and further receiving any second-line therapy, the mOS was 25.7 months as compared with the median overall survival (mOS) of 22.3 months in patients responding to sorafenib and receiving further second-line therapy. Additionally, in responders switching from lenvatinib to sorafenib, the mOS was 26.2 months. In the recently published comparative study of lenvatinib and transarterial chemoembolization on the BCLC B stage, inferiority of lenvatinib was demonstrated in terms of OS, PFS and ORR in certain patient categories. Considering the data obtained in the REFLECT population, where in patients achieving the RR to the first-line treatment with lenvatinib and further receiving the local antitumor procedures the mOS increased to 27.2 months (95% CI 20.729.8), prescribing target and locoregional therapy in certain cases in this very sequence is possible. The recently published data about administration of lenvatinib outside of the inclusion criteria for the REFLECT trial, have proved the efficacy and safety of this drug administration in real clinical practice, thus significantly expanding our understanding of the key role of lenvatinib in the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Overall survival and treatment patterns among real-world patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with first-line therapy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 464-464
Author(s):  
Jason C Simeone ◽  
Beth L Nordstrom ◽  
Ketan Patel ◽  
Alyssa B Klein ◽  
Laura Horne
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

464 Background: Although platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC), overall survival (OS) remains poor. Real world data on the treatment patterns for UC and effectiveness of these treatments are limited. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who received first line therapy were identified from the Flatiron Oncology electronic medical record database from 2011–2016; patients who previously received immunotherapy treatment were excluded. Treatment characteristics included the most frequently administered first-line regimens in the study cohort and the time from advanced/metastatic diagnosis to start of first-line therapy. Median OS from the start of first-line therapy was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented. Results: Of 1,811 included patients who met study inclusion and exclusion criteria, the mean age was 70.4 ± 9.5 years, and 73.2% were male. Fewer than 3% of patients were tested for PD-L1 during follow-up. Platinum-based chemotherapy was the most commonly prescribed first-line treatment and immunotherapy was used in 1.3% of first-line regimens (Table 1); patients received a median of one treatment line during follow-up. The median OS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 11.8–13.5) from initiation of first-line therapy. Conclusions: Overall survival among locally advanced/metastatic UC patients who received first-line therapy in a real-world setting was approximately one year. As immunotherapy treatment for UC becomes more common, the impact on OS in the real world setting remains to be seen. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document