Balancing the weighting of various components of phosphorus loss in models is a critical but often overlooked step in accurate estimation of risk of P loss under field conditions. This study compared the P loss coefficients used to predict dissolved P losses from desorption from accumulated P in the soil, and those incidental to applications of P as fertilizer or manure, with extraction coefficients determined from actual P losses reported in literature for sites in Canada, with the addition of some sites with similar soils and climate from the northern tier of the United States. The extraction coefficients for dissolved P measured in runoff water was greater by a factor of 6.5X in year-round edge-of-field measurements than in runoff boxes, indicating that models using P extraction coefficients derived from runoff box experiments will be underestimating the magnitude of losses from P accumulation in soil. Differences among the measurement methods (runoff box, rainfall simulator or edge-of-field) were not evident for incidental losses from applied P, but current models appear to over-predict the losses of applied P. Good fit between measured and modelled DP concentrations were achieved by applying coefficients of 0.275 to the fertilizer equations, and 0.219 to the manure equations, implying that 72.5% of fertilizer P and 78% of manure P are not available for runoff. This study underlines the importance of considering the relative weights of the various components of P loss as new models are developed and validated.
Closed depressions and soil phosphorus influence subsurface phosphorus losses in a tile‐drained field in Illinois