scholarly journals Prediction models for child and adolescent mental health: A systematic review of methodology and reporting in recent research

JCPP Advances ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morwenna Senior ◽  
Thomas Fanshawe ◽  
Mina Fazel ◽  
Seena Fazel
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Adolescent Mental Health ◽  
Child And Adolescent

Effects of Pollution on Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Protocol for a Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Theron ◽  
Yael Abreu-Villaça ◽  
Marcus Augusto-Oliveira ◽  
Caroline Brennan ◽  
Maria Elena Crespo-Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adolescent Mental Health ◽  
Child And Adolescent ◽  
Mental Health Practitioners ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
Health Practitioners ◽  
The Face ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Pollution Exposure

Abstract Background Whilst there is little uncertainty about the deleterious impact of pollution on human and planetary health, pollution’s impact on child and adolescent mental health is less well understood. This is particularly true for young people in underdeveloped and developing world contexts, about whom research is generally lacking. Furthermore, although child and adolescent resilience continues to be a research priority, little attention has been paid to child and adolescent pathways of resilience in the face or aftermath of pollution exposure. Methods We will conduct a systematic review that adheres to PRISMA guidelines. Its purpose is to document what is known about how pollution affects child and adolescent mental health, along with what protects children and adolescents against these effects and associations across diverse contexts. Discussion Systematic insights are likely to support psychologists and other mental health practitioners to better support child and adolescent wellbeing globally regardless of exposure to pollution. Systematic review registration We have registered the review protocol in PROSPERO (registration: CRD42020176664).

scholarly journals Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (22) ◽  
pp. 11897
Author(s):  
Michael John Norton
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Organisational Change ◽  
Adolescent Mental Health ◽  
Child And Adolescent ◽  
Therapeutic Environment ◽  
Quality Literature ◽  
Recovery Approach

Background: Mental health services are currently experiencing much systemic and organisational change. Many countries have adopted a recovery approach to service provision through the development of national policies and frameworks. Within an Irish context, co-production has been identified as one of the four pillars required for services to become recovery orientated. However, there is a paucity of literature relating to the concept within child and adolescent mental health services. This paper aims to synthesise the peer-reviewed evidence on co-production within such services. Methods: A PRISMA compliant systematic review was undertaken. This includes how the reviewer retrieved, shortlisted, and selected studies for inclusion in the review. It outlines the inclusion/exclusion criteria and how these were further developed through the PICO framework. Finally, the methods also outline how the reviewer assessed bias and quality, as well as the process of data synthesis. Results: Two studies were included in this review, both focusing on co-production, but in different contexts within child and adolescent mental health. Two themes were identified: ‘road less travelled’ and ‘co-producing equality’. These themes and the associated sub-themes describe how co-production works in these services. Discussion: These results highlight the paucity of quality literature in co-production within child and adolescent mental health. Both studies scored poorly in terms of quality. Resulting from this review, a number of actions relating to the therapeutic environment need to be taken into account for co-production to be further implemented. Other: The reviewer has not received any funding for this paper. A protocol was not created or registered for this review.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document