The effect of maternal obesity on sonographic fetal weight estimation and perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Cody ◽  
Julia Unterscheider ◽  
Sean Daly ◽  
Michael P. Geary ◽  
Mairead M. Kennelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Maternal Obesity ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation

DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF SELECTIVE FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION IN MONOCHORIONIC TWINS

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDUARD GRATACÓS ◽  
ELISENDA EIXARCH ◽  
FATIMA CRISPI
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Common Sense ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Abdominal Circumference ◽  
Monochorionic Twins ◽  
Normal Ranges ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight ◽  
Simple Definition

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) has been reported to occur in about 10–15% of monochorionic (MC) twins. The diagnosis of sFGR has been based on variable criteria including estimated fetal weight (EFW), abdominal circumference and/or the degree of fetal weight discordance. Recent studies tend to use a simple definition which includes the presence of an EFW less than the 10th percentile in the smaller twin. Some would argue that the intertwin fetal weight discordance should be included in the definition. Indeed this factor plays a major role in the complications presented by these cases. While the majority of cases with one fetus below the 10th percentile usually will also present with a large intertwin EFW discordance, the contrary is not always true. Thus, it is possible to find MC twins with remarkable intertwin EFW discordance but the EFW of both fetuses are still within normal ranges. Although it appears to be common sense that a large intertwin discrepancy might represent a higher risk for some of the complications described later in this review, there is no consistent evidence to support this notion. Therefore, due to its simplicity, a definition based on an EFW below 10th percentile in one twin is probably the most useful for clinical and research purposes.

scholarly journals Perinatal outcome of stage-based management of fetal growth restriction in a government tertiary care hospital in Kerala, India

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 2354
Author(s):  
Bhargavi Rangarajan ◽  
Lalithambica Karunakaran
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Medical College

BACKGROUND: Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) is the largest contributing factor to perinatal morbidity, mortality and impaired neurodevelopment. This research strives to elucidate the perinatal outcomes of stage based management of fetal growth restriction using Obstetric Doppler and its  association with maternal sociodemographic profile.METHODS: The research was  conducted among 320 antenatal women whose Estimated Fetal weight was  <10th centile. Periodic follow up with Doppler was done and managed as per the stage of FGR. Perinatal outcomes were compiled.RESULTS: The incidence of FGR in T.D Medical College, Alappuzha  was 15.23%. SGA  accounted for 47 %.  The proportion of early and late onset FGR was  10.3%    &   89.7%    respectively.  57.18% of the newborns were admitted to NICU.  The common complications were: Low birth weight – 47.8% ARDS – 21% , Sepsis – 9.6%, Necrotizing enterocolitis – 4%, Hyperbilirubinemia – 4.9%. The incidence of Neonatal death and stillbirth were 1.56% and 0.3% respectively. Mothers who were underweight, inadequate weight gain during pregnancy and short inter pregnancy interval had increased risks. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was the commonly associated medical condition. CONCLUSION: Prolongation of pregnancy  even by one day results in 2% increased chances of survival of the newborn. Hence, it becomes imperative to identify the benign forms of FGR  to prevent iatrogenic prematurity. Antenatal women should be screened for risk factors and undergo vigilant antepartum surveillance to bring about favourable perinatal outcome. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document