The Japanese version of the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist—Revised: Development and validation

2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Yasuda ◽  
Bernard Lubin ◽  
Juhu Kim ◽  
Rodney Van Whitlock
Keyword(s):  
Japanese Version ◽  
Adjective Checklist ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Affect Adjective

Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist--Revised Japanese Version

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Yasuda ◽  
Pui-Wa Lei ◽  
Hoi K. Suen
Keyword(s):  
Japanese Version ◽  
Adjective Checklist ◽  
Affect Adjective

The development and validation of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire: Japanese version

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. e12617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Tomotaki ◽  
Hiroki Fukahori ◽  
Ikuko Sakai ◽  
Kana Kurokohchi
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Development And Validation

Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Quality of Life Assessment of Spina Bifida in Teenagers ( QUALAS ‐T‐J)

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
pp. 1232-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Kawahara ◽  
Yoshifumi Sugita ◽  
Hitoshi Momose ◽  
Konrad M Szymanski ◽  
Eisuke Hida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Spina Bifida ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Quality Of Life Assessment ◽  
Development And Validation

Development and Validation of Japanese version of Machiavellianism scale

2011 ◽  
Vol 75 (0) ◽  
pp. 2PM006-2PM006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshitake Nakamura ◽  
Kai HIRAISHI ◽  
Atsuko SAITO ◽  
Kikue SAKAGUCHI ◽  
Toko KIYONARI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Japanese Version ◽  
Development And Validation

scholarly journals Development and validation of the Japanese version of Family Problem Solving Scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Akihiro Saito ◽  
Shigeki Okuyama ◽  
Kazuma Sakamoto ◽  
Koubun Wakashima
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Family Problem ◽  
Development And Validation

Depressive and Elative Mood Inductions as a Function of Exaggerated versus Contradictory Facial Expressions

1989 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 443-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia T. Riccelli ◽  
Carol E. Antila ◽  
J. Alexander Dale ◽  
Herbert L. Klions
Keyword(s):  
Facial Expression ◽  
Facial Expressions ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Mood Induction ◽  
The Other ◽  
Facial Action ◽  
Adjective Checklist ◽  
Visual Scoring ◽  
Induction Sequence ◽  
Affect Adjective

Two studies concerned the relation between facial expression cognitive induction of mood and perception of mood in women undergraduates. In Exp. 1, 20 subjects were randomly assigned to a group who were instructed in exaggerated facial expressions (Demand Group) and 20 subjects were randomly assigned to a group who were not instructed (Nondemand Group). All subjects completed a modified Velten (1968) elation- and depression-induction sequence. Ratings of depression on the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist increased during the depression condition and decreased during the elation condition. Subjects made more facial expressions in the Demand Group than the Nondemand Group from electromyogram measures of the zygomatic and corrugator muscles and from corresponding action unit measures from visual scoring using the Facial Action Scoring System. Subjects who were instructed in the Demand Group rated their depression as more severe during the depression slides than the other group. No such effect was noted during the elation condition. In Exp. 2, 16 women were randomly assigned to a group who were instructed in facial expressions contradictory to those expected on the depression and elation tasks (Contradictory Expression Group). Another 16 women were randomly assigned to a group who were given no instructions about facial expressions (Nondemand Group). All subjects completed the depression- and elation-induction sequence mentioned in Exp. 1. No differences were reported between groups on the ratings of depression (MAACL) for the depression-induction or for the elation-induction but both groups rated depression higher after the depression condition and lower after the elation condition. Electromyographic and facial action scores verified that subjects in the Contradictory Expression Group were making the requested contradictory facial expressions during the mood-induction sequences. It was concluded that the primary influence on emotion came from the cognitive mood-induction sequences. Facial expressions only seem to modify the emotion in the case of depression being exacerbated by frowning. A contradictory facial expression did not affect the rating of an emotion.

The development and validation of a revised Friendship Activity Scale and Adjective Checklist for use in the Indonesian Unified Sports program

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-28
Author(s):  
Erick Burhaein ◽  
Diajeng Tyas Pinru Phytanza ◽  
Nevzat Demirci
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Cultural Context ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Sports Psychology ◽  
Special Olympics ◽  
Adjective Checklist ◽  
Tests And Measurements ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Activity Scale ◽  
Development And Validation

The Friendship Activity Scale and the Adjective Checklist were initially developed in the USA for the purpose of measuring children’s attitudes towards intellectual disability (Siperstein, 1980). This research reports the development and validation of an Indonesian revision of these instruments, the Friendship Activity Observation Test (FAOT) and the Adjective Observational Checklistl (AOT) for use in its unified sports program (Special Olympics). Nine experts, with national and international level experience of 12-30 years, participated in this research. They comprised a psychometry expert, a sports psychology expert, a children with intellectual disability (ID) expert, a sport tests and measurements expert, and five unified sports trainers of children with ID. Content validity ratio (CVR) was used to assess the validity of the revised items. Following the formula proposed by Lawshe, the provision of a minimum value of CVR 0.78 was established as the criterion. Following the Delphi process, the average validity value of the items in each instrument was 0.945 for the FAOT and 0.941 for the AOT. The resulting drafts were then further tested and refined to check the content, construct, and rationale using the expert panel. The FAOT and AOT instruments when compared to the original versions were found to have increased utility in the Indonesian context as a result of increased balance in the number of indicators and items defining each factor, adjusting to the socio-cultural context of Indonesia, corresponding the instrument items and indicators to the context of unified sports for ID children, and the provision of implementation instructions, lattices instruments, as well as an observation-based rating rubric.

Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Kanako Kondo ◽  
Masanobu Mizuta ◽  
Yoshitaka Kawai ◽  
Tohru Sogami ◽  
Shintaro Fujimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Voice Quality ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Perceptual Evaluation ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Development And Validation

Purpose: Auditory-perceptual evaluation is essential for the assessment of voice quality. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) provides a standardized protocol and assessment form for clinicians to analyze the voice quality and has been adapted into several different languages. The aims of this study were to develop the Japanese version of the CAPE-V and to investigate its reliability and validity. Method: The Japanese CAPE-V consisted of the same three speech contexts (vowels, sentences, and conversation) as developed in the original English version. The sentences were designed according to the concepts of the original version and reviewed by Japanese phoneticians. To validate the usefulness of the Japanese CAPE-V, voices of 173 Japanese-speaking subjects (76 subjects with dysphonia and 97 without voice complaints) were evaluated by five experienced judges, according to the Japanese CAPE-V as well as the GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) scale. Results: The Japanese CAPE-V provided a high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] > .85 for all the parameters) as well as a high intrarater reliability (ICCs > .85 for all the parameters). In addition, overall severity, roughness, and breathiness in the Japanese CAPE-V were highly correlated with the corresponding dimensions in the GRBAS scale, having Spearman correlation coefficients greater than .8. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the reliability and validity of the newly developed Japanese CAPE-V as an auditory-perceptual evaluation instrument.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document