scholarly journals Health Service Use and Quality of Life Recovery 12 Months Following Major Osteoporotic Fracture: Latent Class Analyses of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study ( ICUROS )

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Talevski ◽  
Kerrie M Sanders ◽  
Ljoudmila Busija ◽  
Alison Beauchamp ◽  
Gustavo Duque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Health Service Use ◽  
Major Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Latent Class Analyses

scholarly journals Gender Differences in Self-Rated Health among University Students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: Do Confounding Variables Matter?

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walid EL-Ansari ◽  
Christiane Stock
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Physical Health ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Health Behaviours ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Health Service Use ◽  
Health Complaints ◽  
Self Rated Health

<p><strong>INTRODUCTION:</strong> We assessed gender differences in self-rated health (SRH) while considering physical health, health complaints, health service use, wider wellbeing, and health behaviours.</p><p><strong>METHODS:</strong> 3706 undergraduates at 7 Universities in the United Kingdom completed a self-administered questionnaire (2009–2008). Logistic regressions with excellent/very good SRH as dependent variable assessed the variables that explained the SRH sex difference. </p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> Females had more health complaints, illness periods, lower quality of life, more burdens, and took medication/s more often. The crude (unadjusted) odds ratio (OR) proposed that females were less likely to report excellent/very good SRH than males [OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.94]. Adjusting only for physical health and health service use, females’ OR increased considerably, and the association between female sex and SRH was no longer significant. Also, when adjusting only for wider well-being or when adjusting only for health behaviour, the negative association between females and SRH was no longer significant. Adjusting for all the variables simultaneously (physical health, health service use, wider well-being, health behaviours) resulted in considerable increase of females’ OR indicating now a positive association between female sex and SRH [OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.04-1.74].  </p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> Females’ lower SRH found in the crude analyses was confounded by their higher stress level, lower quality of life, lower physical activity and by more illnesses or health complaints when compared with males. Gender-related SRH research should control for many potential confounders to prevent overestimation of the gender effect. Health promotion programs should consider these factors when tackling gender health disparities.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document