scholarly journals A Comparison of Bone‐Targeted Exercise Strategies to Reduce Fracture Risk in Middle‐Aged and Older Men with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: LIFTMOR‐M Semi‐Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1404-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy T Harding ◽  
Benjamin K Weeks ◽  
Conor Lambert ◽  
Steven L Watson ◽  
Lisa J Weis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Older Men ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Reduce Fracture Risk

scholarly journals Effect of calcium supplementation on fracture risk: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

2008 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 1945-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari ◽  
Judy R Rees ◽  
Maria V Grau ◽  
Elizabeth Barry ◽  
Jiang Gui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Calcium Supplementation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals The Aging trial: Design of a randomized controlled trial to increase physical activity in middle-aged and older adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 106105
Author(s):  
Manfred Diehl ◽  
Abigail Nehrkorn-Bailey ◽  
Katherine Thompson ◽  
Diana Rodriguez ◽  
Kaigang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Trial Design ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals High-Intensity Interval Circuit Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Middle-Aged and Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismael Ballesta-García ◽  
Ignacio Martínez-González-Moro ◽  
Domingo J Ramos-Campo ◽  
María Carrasco-Poyatos
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Older Women ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Better Than

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has similar or better effects than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in increasing peak oxygen consumption (VO2max), however, it has not been studied when HIIT is applied in a circuit (HIICT). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a HIICT versus MICT on VO2max estimated (VO2max-ES), heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) of middle-aged and older women. A quasi-experimental randomized controlled trial was used. Fifty-four women (67.8 ± 6.2 years) were randomized to either HIICT (n = 18), MICT (n = 18) or non-exercise control group (CG; n = 18) for 18 weeks. Participants in HIICT and MICT trained two days/week (one hour/session). Forty-one participants were assessed (HIICT; n = 17, MICT; n = 12, CG; n = 12). Five adverse events were reported. Cardiorespiratory fitness, HR and BP were measured. The tests were performed before and after the exercise intervention programs. VO2max-ES showed significant training x group interaction, in which HIICT and MICT were statistically superior to CG. Moreover, HIICT and MICT were statistically better than CG in the diastolic blood pressure after exercise (DBPex) interaction. For the systolic blood pressure after exercise (SBPex), HIICT was statistically better than CG. In conclusion, both HIICT and MICT generated adaptations in VO2max-ES and DBPex. Furthermore, only HIICT generated positive effects on the SBPex. Therefore, both training methods can be considered for use in exercise programs involving middle-aged and older women.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document