Promotion of bone regeneration on titanium implants through a chemical treatment process using calcium phosphate slurry: Microscopic analysis, cellular response, and animal experiment

2018 ◽  
Vol 106 (7) ◽  
pp. 2716-2724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuro Ito ◽  
Naofumi Ohtsu ◽  
Masanari Tomozawa ◽  
Mitsuhiro Hirano ◽  
Hiroko Takita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Chemical Treatment ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Animal Experiment ◽  
Treatment Process ◽  
Microscopic Analysis ◽  
Titanium Implants

Osseointegration of Calcium Phosphate Nanofilms on Titanium Alloy Implants

2007 ◽  
Vol 361-363 ◽  
pp. 645-648
Author(s):  
M.D. Paz ◽  
Stefano Chiussi ◽  
Pio González ◽  
Julia Serra ◽  
Betty León ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Titanium Alloy ◽  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Growth ◽  
Pulsed Laser ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
Optical Methods ◽  
Phosphate Coatings ◽  
Calcium Phosphate Coatings

In the present work two different hydroxyapatite nanofilms (50 and 100 nm thick) have been successfully deposited on titanium implants that were previously laser macrostructured in order to assess the influence of the thickness of nanometric calcium phosphate coatings on the osseointegration. Cylindrical implants were tested in a sheep tibia model together with titanium alloy controls achieving very good osseointegration results. Laser macrostructured titanium alloy implants have shown improved bone regeneration when coated with nanometric films of carbonated HA. The pulsed laser deposited nanofilm has promoted bone in-growth deep into the laser ablated craters. There were no significant differences between the two coating thicknesses, neither when assessed with electron microscopy or classical optical methods. This result suggests that the 50 nm coating is as effective as the 100 nm one, therefore implying that the thickness limit for such a bioactive layer to stimulate bone growth may be even further below.

Calcium Phosphate-Coated Titanium Implants in the Mandible: Limitations of the in vivo Minipig Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 177-187
Author(s):  
Till Kämmerer ◽  
Tony Lesmeister ◽  
Victor Palarie ◽  
Eik Schiegnitz ◽  
Andrea Schröter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Surface Modifications ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
In Vivo Model ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Press Fit ◽  
Endosseous Implant ◽  
Bone To Implant Contact

Introduction: We aimed to compare implant osseointegration with calcium phosphate (CaP) surfaces and rough subtractive-treated sandblasted/acid etched surfaces (SA) in an in vivo minipig mandible model. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 cylindrical press-fit implants with two different surfaces (CaP, n = 18; SA, n = 18) were inserted bilaterally into the mandible of 9 adult female minipigs. After 2, 4, and 8 weeks, we analyzed the cortical bone-to-implant contact (cBIC; %) and area coverage of bone-to-implant contact within representative bone chambers (aBIC; %). Results: After 2 weeks, CaP implants showed no significant increase in cBIC and aBIC compared to SA (cBIC: mean 38 ± 5 vs. 16 ± 11%; aBIC: mean 21 ± 1 vs. 6 ± 9%). Two CaP implants failed to achieve osseointegration. After 4 weeks, no statistical difference between CaP and SA was seen for cBIC (mean 54 ± 15 vs. 43 ± 16%) and aBIC (mean 43 ± 28 vs. 32 ± 6). However, we excluded two implants in each group due to failure of osseointegration. After 8 weeks, we observed no significant intergroup differences (cBIC: 18 ± 9 vs. 18 ± 20%; aBIC: 13 ± 8 vs. 16 ± 9%). Again, three CaP implants and two SA implants had to be excluded due to failure of osseointegration. Conclusion: Due to multiple implant losses, we cannot recommend the oral mandibular minipig in vivo model for future endosseous implant research. Considering the higher rate of osseointegration failure, CaP coatings may provide an alternative to common subtractive implant surface modifications in the early phase post-insertion.

Elaboration of a triphasic calcium phosphate and silica nanocomposite for maxillary grafting and deposition on titanium implants

2018 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
Nelson Heriberto Almeida Camargo ◽  
Enori Gemelli ◽  
Laís Schmitz Passoni ◽  
Priscila Ferraz Franczak ◽  
Pricyla Corrêa
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
Silica Nanocomposite

scholarly journals Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Palmquist ◽  
Omar M. Omar ◽  
Marco Esposito ◽  
Jukka Lausmaa ◽  
Peter Thomsen
Keyword(s):  
Surface Properties ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cell Communication ◽  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
Material Surface ◽  
Oral Implants

Bone-anchored titanium implants have revolutionized oral healthcare. Surface properties of oral titanium implants play decisive roles for molecular interactions, cellular response and bone regeneration. Nevertheless, the role of specific surface properties, such as chemical and phase composition and nanoscale features, for the biological in vivo performance remains to be established. Partly, this is due to limited transfer of state-of-the-art preparation techniques to complex three-dimensional geometries, analytical tools and access to minute, intact interfacial layers. As judged by the available results of a few randomized clinical trials, there is no evidence that any particular type of oral implant has superior long-term success. Important insights into the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells, cell–cell communication at the interface and high-resolution imaging of the interface between the surface oxide and the biological host are prerequisites for the understanding of the mechanisms of osseointegration. Strategies for development of the next generation of material surface modifications for compromised tissue are likely to include time and functionally programmed properties, pharmacological modulation and incorporation of cellular components.

Calcium Phosphate Coating on Blast-Treated Titanium Implants by RF Magnetron Sputtering

2009 ◽  
Vol 631-632 ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyosuke Ueda ◽  
Takayuki Narushima ◽  
Takashi Goto ◽  
T. Katsube ◽  
Hironobu Nakagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Magnetron Sputtering ◽  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Rf Magnetron Sputtering ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
Calcium Phosphate Coating ◽  
Phosphate Coating ◽  
Coating Films

Calcium phosphate coating films were fabricated on Ti-6Al-4V plates and screw-type implants with a blast-treated surface using radiofrequency (RF) magnetron sputtering and were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) and oxyapatite (OAp) films obtained in this study could cover the blast-treated substrate very efficiently, maintaining the surface roughness. For the in vitro evaluations of the calcium phosphate coating films, bonding strength and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity were examined. The bonding strength of the coating films to a blast-treated substrate exceeded 60 MPa, independent of film phases except for the film after post-heat-treatment in silica ampoule. When compared with an uncoated substrate, the increase in the ALP activity of osteoblastic SaOS-2 cells on a calcium phosphate coated substrate was confirmed by a cell culture test. The removal torque of screw-type Ti-6Al-4V implants with a blast-treated surface from the femur of Japanese white rabbit increased with the duration of implantation and it was statistically improved by coating an ACP film 2 weeks after implantation. The in vitro and in vivo studies suggested that the application of the sputtered ACP film as a coating on titanium implants was effective in improving their biocompatibility with bones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document