Coralline hydroxyapatite is a suitable bone graft substitute in an intra-articular goat defect model

2008 ◽  
Vol 90B (1) ◽  
pp. 116-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Koëter ◽  
S. J. Tigchelaar ◽  
P. Farla ◽  
L. Driessen ◽  
A. van Kampen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Defect Model ◽  
Coralline Hydroxyapatite

Evaluation of a silica-containing bone graft substitute in a vertebral defect model

2009 ◽  
Vol 9999A ◽  
pp. NA-NA
Author(s):  
Hideo Kobayashi ◽  
A. Simon Turner ◽  
Howard B. Seim ◽  
Teruya Kawamoto ◽  
Thomas W. Bauer
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Defect Model

Coralline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Substitute in Hindfoot Surgery

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Coughlin ◽  
Jerry S. Grimes ◽  
Michael P. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Coralline Hydroxyapatite

Porous Beta-Calcium Pyrophosphate as a Bone Graft Substitute in a Canine Bone Defect Model

2003 ◽  
Vol 240-242 ◽  
pp. 399-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hyup Lee ◽  
D.H. Lee ◽  
Hyun Seung Ryu ◽  
Bong-Soon Chang ◽  
Kug Sun Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Defect ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Calcium Pyrophosphate ◽  
Defect Model

Bovine-Derived Bone Protein as a Bone Graft Substitute in a Canine Segmental Defect Model

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 496-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus F. Sciadini ◽  
John M. Dawson ◽  
Kenneth D. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Segmental Defect ◽  
Defect Model

Case Series: Use of Coralline Hydroxyapatite Graft In Faciomaxillary Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Slater
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Disease Transmission ◽  
Bone Ingrowth ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Coralline Hydroxyapatite ◽  
Important Solution ◽  
The Ideal

Bone grafting represents an important solution for defects in maxillofacial and orthopaedic surgeries. Ideal properties of a bone graft allow proper integration, enabling cosmetic appeal and mechanical functionality. Whilst current autograft, allograft and xenograft applications do exist and are regularly used clinically, they are associated with numerous solutions, such as availability, disease transmission and donor site morbidity. Synthetic and naturally sourced solutions can avoid these issues, whilst maintaining the ideal bone integrative properties of their autograft counterparts. This case series aims to identify the effectiveness of a natural bone graft substitute, coralline hydroxyapatite, in maxillofacial applications, and demonstrate that coralline hydroxyapatite encourages bone ingrowth for dental defects.

202 CORALLINE HYDROXYAPATITE BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTES IN A CANINE METAPHYSEAL DEFECT MODEL

1986 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S51
Author(s):  
D. J. Sartoris ◽  
R. E. Holmes ◽  
W. Bucholz ◽  
V. Mooney ◽  
D. Resnick
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Defect Model ◽  
Coralline Hydroxyapatite ◽  
Bone Graft Substitutes

IN VIVO EVALUATION OF A NEW β-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE BONE SUBSTITUTE IN A RABBIT FEMUR DEFECT MODEL

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (03) ◽  
pp. 1550028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kam-Kong Chan ◽  
Chia-Hsien Chen ◽  
Lien-Chen Wu ◽  
Yi-Jie Kuo ◽  
Chun-Jen Liao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Tricalcium Phosphate ◽  
Bone Substitute ◽  
Zealand White Rabbit ◽  
Bone Substitutes ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Defect Model ◽  
In Vivo Evaluation ◽  
Rabbit Femur

Calcium phosphate ceramics, of a similar composition to that of mineral bone, and which possess the properties of bioactivity and osteoconductivity, have been widely used as substitutes for bone graft in orthopedic, plastic and craniofacial surgeries. A synthetic β-tricalcium phosphate, Osteocera™, a recently developed bone graft substitute, has been used in this study. To evaluate the affinity and efficacy of Osteocera™ as bone defect implant, we used a New Zealand white rabbit femur defect model to test the osteoconductivity of this new bone substitute. Alternative commercially available bone substitutes, Triosite® and ProOsteon500, were used as the control materials. These three bone substitutes show good biocompatibility, and no abnormal inflammation either infection was seen at the implantation sites. In the histological and histomorphometric images, newly formed bone grew into the peripheral pores in the bone substitutes. After six months implantation, the volume of bone formation was found to be 20.5 ± 5.2%, 29.8 ± 6.5% and 75.5 ± 4.9% of the potential total cavity offered by ProOsteon500, Triosite® and Osteocera™, respectively. The newly formed bone area within the femur defect section for Osteocera™ was significantly larger than ProOsteon500 and Triosite®. We concluded that Osteocera™ shows better bioresorbability, biocompatibility and osteoconductivity in the rabbit femur defect model.

Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes in a canine metaphyseal defect model: radiographic-biomechanical correlation

1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 635-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Sartoris ◽  
Ralph E. Holmes ◽  
Allan F. Tencer ◽  
Vert Mooney ◽  
Donald Resnick
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Defect Model ◽  
Coralline Hydroxyapatite ◽  
Bone Graft Substitutes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document