Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hayashi ◽  
T. Inadome ◽  
T. Mashima ◽  
Y. Sugioka
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
Interface Shear Strength ◽  
Interface Shear ◽  
Bone Implant

Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite—coated titanium on the bone-implant interface shear strength

Biomaterials ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (14) ◽  
pp. 1187-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hayashi ◽  
T. Inadome ◽  
H. Tsumura ◽  
Y. Nakashima ◽  
Y. Sugioka
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Shear Strength ◽  
Interface Shear Strength ◽  
Interface Shear ◽  
Bone Implant ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Influence of revision arthroplasty on bone/cement interface shear strength

1987 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 824
Author(s):  
J.E. Bechtold ◽  
Y. Dohmae ◽  
R.E. Sherman ◽  
R.B. Gustilo
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Bone Cement ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Interface Shear Strength ◽  
Interface Shear ◽  
Cement Interface

scholarly journals Skewness and Kurtosis: Important Parameters in the Characterization of Dental Implant Surface Roughness—A Computer Simulation

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Niklas Hansson ◽  
Stig Hansson
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Shear Strength ◽  
Roughness Parameter ◽  
Interface Shear Strength ◽  
Interface Shear ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Bone Response ◽  
Dental Implant Surface ◽  
Skewness And Kurtosis

The surface roughness affects the bone response to dental implants. A primary aim of the roughness is to increase the bone-implant interface shear strength. Surface roughness is generally characterized by means of surface roughness parameters. It was demonstrated that the normally used parameters cannot discriminate between surfaces expected to give a high interface shear strength from surfaces expected to give a low interface shear strength. It was further demonstrated that the skewness parameter can do this discrimination. A problem with this parameter is that it is sensitive to isolated peaks and valleys. Another roughness parameter which on theoretical grounds can be supposed to give valuable information on the quality of a rough surface is kurtosis. This parameter is also sensitive to isolated peaks and valleys. An implant surface was assumed to have a fairly well-defined and homogenous “semiperiodic” surface roughness upon which isolated peaks were superimposed. In a computerized simulation, it was demonstrated that by using small sampling lengths during measurement, it should be possible to get accurate values of the skewness and kurtosis parameters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document