Prevalence of resurgence during thinning of multiple schedules of reinforcement following functional communication training

Author(s):  
Colin Muething ◽  
Alexis Pavlov ◽  
Nathan Call ◽  
Joel Ringdahl ◽  
Scott Gillespie
2018 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 91-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan A. Call ◽  
Seth B. Clark ◽  
Joanna Lomas Mevers ◽  
Natalie A. Parks ◽  
Valerie M. Volkert ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem Muharib ◽  
Robert C. Pennington

Functional communication training (FCT) involves the reinforcement of an appropriate communicative response as an alternative to challenging behavior. The intervention has been identified as an evidence-based practice across multiple populations. Despite its extensive research support, FCT may be impractical in some educational settings because it often requires educators to reinforce alternative responses at high rates. In this discussion article, we describe three procedures (delay to reinforcement, chained schedules of reinforcement, and multiple schedules of reinforcement) that can be used following FCT in educational settings to teach students who exhibit challenging behaviors to tolerate waiting for a reinforcer.


2021 ◽  
pp. 014544552110360
Author(s):  
Nadrat N. Nuhu ◽  
Sacha T. Pence

Functional communication training (FCT) is used to reduce rates of problem behavior by teaching communicative responses that access functionally equivalent reinforcers. During FCT, the communicative response is typically placed on a dense schedule of reinforcement that is unlikely to be maintained in the natural environment. Experiment 1 evaluated the effects of two schedule-thinning procedures (chained schedules and multiple schedules) on problem behavior maintained by escape from demands for three participants following FCT. The chained and multiple-schedule procedures were effective in reducing rates of problem behavior. Compliance increased under both schedules, but the chained schedule resulted in higher levels of compliance with two participants. In Experiment 2, participants’ preference for the chained or multiple-schedule procedure was evaluated using a modified concurrent-chain procedure. One participant preferred the chained schedule. One participant preferred the multiple schedule. One participant did not appear to discriminate between conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document