Noncontingent and differential reinforcement in the treatment of pediatric feeding problems

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 622-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane P. Berth ◽  
Melanie H. Bachmeyer ◽  
Caitlin A. Kirkwood ◽  
Courtney R. Mauzy ◽  
Billie J. Retzlaff ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (9) ◽  
pp. A32
Author(s):  
P. Novak ◽  
J. Miller ◽  
D. Cullinane ◽  
K. Van Rooyen ◽  
G. Williamson

Author(s):  
Varsovia Hernández Eslava ◽  
Jonathan K. Fernand ◽  
Timothy R. Vollmer

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Vazquez ◽  
Mitch J. Fryling ◽  
Anthony Hernández

The present study evaluates the treatment acceptability and preference for behavioral interventions for feeding problems with parents of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and other developmental disabilities. The impact of behavioral severity on acceptability and preference was also evaluated by comparing results of parents who responded with respect to a vignette of a child with food refusal with those who responded to a vignette of a child with food selectivity. Overall, parents rated differential reinforcement of alternative behavior as the most preferred and most acceptable strategy across both food selectivity and food refusal groups. Escape extinction was the least acceptable and least preferred across both groups, and the severity of the behavior had no impact on acceptability or preference scores. Implications for future research on the social validity of feeding interventions are provided.


2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia J. Manno ◽  
Catherine Fox ◽  
Peggy S. Eicher ◽  
MaryLouise E. Kerwin

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Seubert ◽  
Mitch J. Fryling ◽  
Michele D. Wallace ◽  
Agustin R. Jiminez ◽  
Aimee E. Meier

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 212-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayley Henrikson Estrem ◽  
Britt Frisk Pados ◽  
Suzanne Thoyre ◽  
Kathleen Knafl ◽  
Cara McComish ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document