Stimulus presentation order in receptive identification tasks: A systematic replication

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 634-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiley A. Schneider ◽  
Bailey Devine ◽  
Gabriella Aguilar ◽  
Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Presentation ◽  
Presentation Order ◽  
Systematic Replication ◽  
Receptive Identification

Influence on Motor Performance of Simultaneous Delayed and Synchronous Pure-Tone Auditory Feedback

1964 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard B. Ruhm ◽  
William A. Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Motor Performance ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Stimulus Presentation ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Presentation Order ◽  
Delayed Auditory Feedback ◽  
Intensity Ratios

A study was made of the effect of the presentation order of delay/synchronous (DAF/SAF) intensity ratios on tapping performance under simultaneously presented synchronous and delayed auditory feedback. Comparisons were made between performances of groups who received either primarily positive or primarily negative DAF/SAF ratios in random order. Additional comparisons were made between subjects who received serially presented DAF/SAF ratios in an ascending series and those who were given the same stimuli in a descending DAF/SAF ratio series. It was found that, when synchronous and delayed auditory feedback are presented simultaneously at various DAF/SAF ratios, the presentation order influences the degree of performance disruption. It is concluded that the results of studies involving the use of simultaneously presented SAF and DAF should be interpreted in light of the stimulus presentation order.

Response Latency as a Function of Stimulus Affect and Presentation Order

1966 ◽  
Vol 23 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1111-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Lehr ◽  
Bruce O. Bergum ◽  
Thomas E. Standing
Keyword(s):  
Positive Affect ◽  
Response Latency ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Stimulus Presentation ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Presentation Order ◽  
Paper Tape ◽  
Response Latencies ◽  
Verbal Stimuli ◽  
The Relationship

An experiment was conducted to examine the interrelationships between response-latency, perceived stimulus affect, and stimulus presentation order. Three groups of five Ss each responded to 100 pictorial and verbal stimuli along an ATTRACTIVE-UNATTRACTIVE affect dimension. Overt evaluative responses and response latencies were recorded on paper tape. The results indicated that the relationship between affect and response latency is an inverted U-shaped function with the attractive responses yielding significantly shorter latencies than either neutral or unattractive responses. The order in which stimuli are presented significantly affects both perceived affect and response times. A random order of stimulus presentation results in shorter latencies and greater perceived positive affect than the systematic arrangement of stimuli.

The design and presentation order of Web page buttons

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron W. Bangor ◽  
James T. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Presentation Order ◽  
Web Page
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document