Effects of multiple versus chained schedules on stereotypy and item engagement

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 927-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica D. Slaton ◽  
Gregory P. Hanley
Keyword(s):  
Chained Schedules

Chained schedules.

2005 ◽  
pp. 663-707
Author(s):  
C. B. Ferster ◽  
B. F. Skinner
Keyword(s):  
Chained Schedules

Acquisition of responding on chained schedules: Gradual compared to abrupt introduction of the chain

1970 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-301
Author(s):  
Lewis R. Gollub ◽  
Christian P. Vogt
Keyword(s):  
Chained Schedules

scholarly journals CONTINGENCY AND STIMULUS CHANGE IN CHAINED SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT

1980 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Charles Catania ◽  
Rona Yohalem ◽  
Philip J. Silverman
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Change ◽  
Schedules Of Reinforcement ◽  
Chained Schedules

Comparison of Chained and Tandem Schedules of Reinforcement

1971 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
J. T. Meehan ◽  
W. R. Sewell ◽  
A. M. Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Opposite Effect ◽  
Initial Component ◽  
Schedules Of Reinforcement ◽  
Chained Schedules ◽  
Drl Schedule

The performance of 6 pigeons was compared on chained and tandem VI-FR and VI-DRL schedules of reinforcement. In the case of the chained schedules, varying the value of the FR or DRL schedule in the final component seemed to have little effect on the rate of responding in the initial component. When a FR schedule was programmed in the final component, consistently higher rates of responding were found in the initial component of the tandem schedules when compared to the chained schedules. However, when a DRL schedule was programmed in the final component the opposite effect was observed, i.e., consistently lower rates of responding were observed in the initial component of the tandem schedule when compared to the chained. These results seemed to indicate that separate factors were controlling performance in the chained and tandem schedules.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document