EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT AND EMOTIONAL AVAILABILITY TELE-INTERVENTION FOR ADOPTIVE FAMILIES

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Baker ◽  
Zeynep Biringen ◽  
Beatrice Meyer-Parsons ◽  
Abby Schneider
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-792
Author(s):  
Maren McConnell ◽  
Lia Closson ◽  
Bradley Morse ◽  
Hannah Wurster ◽  
Marjo Flykt ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Van Den Dries ◽  
Femmie Juffer ◽  
Marinus H. Van Ijzendoorn ◽  
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg ◽  
Lenneke R. A. Alink

AbstractIn a short-term longitudinal design we investigated maternal sensitivity, child responsiveness, attachment, and indiscriminate friendliness in families with children internationally adopted from institutions or foster care in China. Ninety-two families with 50 postinstitutionalized and 42 formerly fostered girls, aged 11–16 months on arrival, were studied 2 and 6 months after adoption. Maternal sensitivity and child responsiveness were observed with the Emotional Availability Scales, attachment was assessed with the Strange Situation procedure, and mothers reported on children's indiscriminate friendliness. The postinstitutionalized children showed less secure attachment, whereas the former foster children did not differ from the normative distribution of attachment security. However, at both assessments the two groups of adopted children showed more disorganized attachments compared to normative data. Adoptive mothers of postinstitutionalized and former foster children were equally sensitive and their sensitivity did not change over time. Postinstitutionalized and former foster children did not differ on indiscriminate friendliness, but children with more sensitive adoptive mothers showed less indiscriminate friendliness. The former foster children showed a larger increase in responsiveness over time than the postinstitutionalized children, suggesting that children's responsiveness is more sensitive to change than attachment, and that preadoption foster care is more beneficial for the development of children's responsiveness after adoptive placement than preadoption institutional care.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-91
Author(s):  
Eltigani Abdelgadir Hamid

Changing the prayer direction from Makkah to Jerusalem and then back to Makkah was probably one of the first Muslim community’s most contentious incidents. Due to its being highlighted in Q. 2:142-44, it has aroused an unending debate among Muslim exegetes, jurists, and western historians as to why the qiblah was changed. Was it based on a divine command or Muhammad’s independent judgment, a move to dilute the Arabs’ emotional attachment to the Ka‘bah, or a move to win over Madinah’s Jewish community? Might it have been a throwback to the Abrahamic heritage, envisaged by the Prophet as a base for a wider, monolithic Islamic nationalism? This article seeks to closely examine and clarify the “qiblah literature” in an attempt to reveal the Ka‘bah’s role not only as a geographical locale but also as a spiritual magnet, and to find out whether this incident represented a break or a continuation of an earlier strategy of socio-religious change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document