Safety and efficiency of modified sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: Long‐term studies and outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Hu ◽  
ChunYan Zhong ◽  
Shentao Lu ◽  
Li Lei ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Apical Prolapse ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation ◽  
Long Term Studies

NON-ORAL POSTER 26: Long-term Outcomes Following Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-89
Author(s):  
B S. Hampton ◽  
K S. Sandhu ◽  
S W. Smilen ◽  
C Kwon ◽  
R F. Porges
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation

Iatrogenic Bladder Diverticulum 11 Years After Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Apical Prolapse

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. e8-e9
Author(s):  
Laura Faye Gephart ◽  
Anthony Lewis ◽  
Emily Wu ◽  
Erin Bird ◽  
Kristofer Wagner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Diverticulum ◽  
Apical Prolapse ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation

Long-term functional stability of sacrospinous ligament-fixation repair of pelvic organ prolapse

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 781-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Souviat ◽  
A. Bricou ◽  
R. Porcher ◽  
F. Demaria ◽  
X. Fritel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Functional Stability ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation

scholarly journals SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOR APICAL PROLAPSE REPAIR COMPARED TO OTHER VAGINAL PROCEDURES

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-211
Author(s):  
Olivia IONESCU ◽  
◽  
Nicolae BACALBASA ◽  
Nahedd SABA ◽  
Gabriel BANCEANU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Apical Prolapse ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Prolapse Repair ◽  
Current Frequency ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation ◽  
Uterosacral Ligaments

The vaginal procedures for uterine prolapse and/or vaginal vault prolapse are based on the attachment of the vaginal apex at the sacrospinous ligament (SL), the uterosacral ligaments (USL) or the iliococcygeus fascia. The fixation at the sacrospinous ligament (SSL) known as sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is the most studied and performed method for apical prolapse repair. Generally, it is preferred for cases of vaginal vault prolapse post-hysterectomy compared with the suspension at the uterosacral ligament (USLS) that it is usually performed at the time of uterus removal. Due to its associated high rate of recurrence, especially prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall, SSLS has been progressively abandoned in the favor of other modern vaginal procedures such as the Saba Nahedd technique. However, the frequently reported esh associated complications, there are still logical reasons to continue the performance and development of the SSLF technique. In order to assess the current frequency of application and effectiveness of SSLF we have made a review on the recently published literature on the SSLF technique focusing on the rate of success and recurrence, the peri-and postoperative complications, its impact on the daily activities and sexual function. We have selected systhematic reviews, follow-up and retrospective studies as well as metanalyses which have been published in the last 10 years in the german or english language. The aim of this article is to describe the SSLF technique and its advantages in the treatment of sever uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.

scholarly journals Sacrospinous ligament fixation: medium and long-term anatomical results, functional and quality of life results

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeline Favre-Inhofer ◽  
Marie Carbonnel ◽  
Rouba Murtada ◽  
Aurélie Revaux ◽  
Jennifer Asmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Recurrence Group ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background To evaluate the medium and long-term anatomical results of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SLF) and its impact on quality of life (QoL). Methods We conducted a retrospective and observational single centre study. Fifty-nine patients were interviewed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire and underwent physical examination using POP-Q several years after SLF. Primary outcome was the comparison of anatomic results of SLF at medium-term (group 1: 1–5 years after surgery) and long-term (group 2: more than 5 years after surgery). The secondary outcome was QoL evaluation. Results The overall recurrence and complication rates were respectively 22% and 10%, with no significant differences between groups 1 and 2. The recurrence rate was similar in both groups [twelve (35%) in group 1 and nine (20%) in group 2, p = 0.09]. Two patients (12%) in the recurrence and none in the no recurrence group had clinical symptoms (p = 0.08). Two patients (12%) in the recurrence and one patient (2%) in the no-recurrence group had a significant impact on their quality of life (p = 0.12). Conclusion This study showed sustainable anatomic and functional results of SLF in medium and long-term analysis with overall low morbidity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document