scholarly journals ERRATUM to “Good clinical practice advice: Thyroid and pregnancy” [Int J Gynecol Obstet 144(2019) 347–351]

2020 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-120
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Good Clinical Practice ◽  
Gynecol Obstet

scholarly journals Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 100776
Author(s):  
Amy Corneli ◽  
Annemarie Forrest ◽  
Teresa Swezey ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Pamela Tenaerts
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Good Clinical Practice

Real life studies and good clinical practice

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e160
Author(s):  
Dominique Stephan ◽  
Elena-Mihaela Cordeanu ◽  
Sébastien Gaertner
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Good Clinical Practice

scholarly journals Using Ultrasound Wisely: A Tool to Enhance Good Clinical Practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1740
Author(s):  
Eric Ursprung ◽  
Madhav Swaminathan ◽  
Frederick C. Cobey
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Good Clinical Practice

scholarly journals Oc021—Clinical Trials Registry And Good Clinical Practice: In Indian Scenario

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. e9
Author(s):  
A. Prakash ◽  
B. Medhi ◽  
S. Kaur ◽  
S. Kumari ◽  
P. Sarotra
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Good Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Trials Registry ◽  
Indian Scenario

scholarly journals Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Murphy ◽  
Elias M. Samuels ◽  
H. Robert Kolb ◽  
Linda S. Behar-Horenstein ◽  
Ellen Champagne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Course Completion ◽  
Online Training ◽  
Good Clinical Practice ◽  
Behavioral Research ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Training Course ◽  
Behavioral Trials ◽  
Larger Sample

IntroductionThe Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research Course was developed to provide instruction on good clinical practice for social and behavioral trials. This study evaluated the new course.MethodsParticipants across 4 universities took the course (n=294) and were sent surveys following course completion and 2 months later. Outcomes included relevance, how engaging the course was, and working differently because of the course. Open-ended questions were posed to understand how work was impacted.ResultsParticipants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8/7 points) and reported working differently (4.7/7 points). Participants with less experience in social and behavioral trials were most likely to report working differently 2 months later.DiscussionThe course was perceived as relevant and engaging. Participants described actions taken to improve rigor in implementing trials. Future studies with a larger sample and additional participating sites are recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document