Simplified laparoscopic sacropexy avoiding deep vaginal dissection

2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Cosma ◽  
Paolo Petruzzelli ◽  
Michela Chiadò Fiorio Tin ◽  
Silvia Parisi ◽  
Elena Olearo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy

Outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacropexy on one hundred fifteen cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 101795
Author(s):  
Gonca Coban Serbetcioglu ◽  
Seda Yuksel Simsek ◽  
Songul Alemdaroglu ◽  
Pinar Caglar Aytac ◽  
Hakan Kalayci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Sacropexy: A Retrospective Analysis of Perioperative Complications and Anatomical Outcomes

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 428-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Bojahr ◽  
Garri Tchartchian ◽  
Matthias Waldschmidt ◽  
Thoralf Schollmeyer ◽  
Rudy L. De Wilde
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy ◽  
Anatomical Outcomes

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Sacropexy Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Retrospective Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. S12
Author(s):  
M. Miró Matos ◽  
I. Lopez Carrasco ◽  
C. del Valle Rubido ◽  
A. Vegas Carrillo de Albornoz ◽  
A. Salvaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy

scholarly journals Comparison of dynamic MRI vaginal anatomical changes after vaginal mesh surgery and laparoscopic sacropexy

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-256
Author(s):  
Hiromi Kashihara ◽  
Virginie Emmanuelli ◽  
Edouard Poncelet ◽  
Chrystèle Rubod ◽  
Jean-Philippe Lucot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Mri ◽  
Vaginal Mesh ◽  
Anatomical Changes ◽  
Mesh Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy

scholarly journals Outcome of laparoscopic sacropexy with polypropilene mesh

2016 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 253-254
Author(s):  
Kristina Drusany Starič ◽  
Adolf Lukanović ◽  
Gregor Norčič ◽  
Matija Barbič ◽  
Sašo Kostoski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy

Outcomes of laparoscopic sacropexy in women over 70: A comparative study

2016 ◽  
Vol 207 ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Sophie Boudy ◽  
Thibault Thubert ◽  
Marie Vinchant ◽  
Jean François Hermieu ◽  
Vincent Villefranque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy

scholarly journals Serious complications and recurrences after pelvic organ prolapse surgery for 2309 women in the VIGI-MESH registry

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Fritel ◽  
Renaud de Tayrac ◽  
Joe de Keizer ◽  
Sandrine Campagne-Loiseau ◽  
Michel Cosson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Transvaginal Mesh ◽  
Vaginal Repair ◽  
Mesh Placement ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Prolapse Recurrence ◽  
Pop Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy ◽  
One Year

Objective: To assess the incidence of serious complications and reoperations for recurrence after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery and compare the three most common types of repair. Design: Prospective cohort study using a registry. Setting: 19 surgical centres in France. Population: 2309 women participated between 2017 and 2019. Methods: a multivariate analysis including an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was used to obtain three comparable groups. Main outcome measures: Serious complications and subsequent reoperations for POP recurrence Results: Mean follow-up was 16.6 months. Surgeries included in the analysis were native tissue vaginal repair (N=504), transvaginal mesh placement (692), and laparoscopic sacropexy with mesh (1113). Serious complications occurred among 52 women (2.3%), and reoperation for recurrence was required for 32 (1.4%). At one year, the cumulative weighted incidence of serious complications was 1.8% for native tissue vaginal repair (95% confidence interval 0-3.9), 3.9% for transvaginal mesh (2.0-5.9), and 2.2% for sacropexy (1.1-2.6). Compared with the native tissue vaginal repair group, the risk of serious complications was higher in the transvaginal mesh group (weighted-HR 3.84, 2.43-6.08), and the sacropexy group (2.48, 1.45-4.23), while the risk of reoperation for prolapse recurrence was reduced in both groups (transvaginal mesh [0.22, 0.13-0.39] and sacropexy [0.29, 0.18-0.47]). Conclusions: Laparoscopic sacropexy with mesh appears to have a better risk profile (few serious complications and few reoperations for recurrence) than transvaginal mesh placement (more serious complications) and native tissue vaginal repair (more reoperations for recurrence). These results are useful for informing women and for shared decision making.

scholarly journals Nerve preserving vs standard laparoscopic sacropexy: Postoperative bowel function

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Cosma ◽  
Paolo Petruzzelli ◽  
Saverio Danese ◽  
Chiara Benedetto
Keyword(s):  
Bowel Function ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy

Peek’s harpoon: a new device for the treatment of laparoscopic sacropexy. Preliminary study in unembalmed cadavers

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 881-885
Author(s):  
Marta Girvent Vilarmau ◽  
Felipe Ojeda Pérez ◽  
Maria José Canto Rivera ◽  
Marian Lorente Gascón
Keyword(s):  
New Device ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy ◽  
Preliminary Study

Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacropexy on symptoms and quality of life. Predictive factors for postoperative dissatisfaction

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 2085-2092
Author(s):  
Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato ◽  
Marion Fermaut ◽  
Catalina Varas ◽  
Arnaud Fauconnier ◽  
Georges Bader
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document