Negative HPV testing among patients with biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or cervical cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo González-Bosquet ◽  
Sergi Fernandez ◽  
Sally Sabra ◽  
Jose M. Lailla
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
Renee Pradhan ◽  
U. Pant ◽  
B. Aryal

Introduction: Cancer cervix is a common genital cancer. Human papillomavirus is the main cause of cervical cancer because of the strong association of certain HPV genotypes and the development of cervical cancer and its precursor lesions, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia CIN 2 or CIN3. Methods: The study was conducted on 180 gynecological patients seen at the outpatient department of Manipal Hospital, Bangalore. A comparative study of HPV DNA test with Pap smear in the screening of cervical neoplasia was carried out over the period of 24 months from August 2011 to June 2013. Results: The incidence of cervical cancer and its associated mortality has declined in recent years, largely due to the widespread implementation of screening programs by Pap smear testing. The management and the prevention of cervical cancer should change with HPV DNA testing for high risk HPV, which is more sensitive than pap smear testing. Infection of cervix with HPV is necessary to cause cervical neoplasia and cervical cancer. Persistent infection with HPV is required for the development of cervical dysplasia and invasive cervical cancer. Conclusions: HPV testing alone for primary screening appears promising in women aged 30 years and older as this group is at greatest risk of developing CIN 3. As compared with Pap testing, HPV testing has greater sensitivity for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-201
Author(s):  
Diede L. Loopik ◽  
Joanna IntHout ◽  
Renée M.F. Ebisch ◽  
Willem J.G. Melchers ◽  
Leon F.A.G. Massuger ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.Denise Zielinski ◽  
Lawrence Rozendaal ◽  
Feja J Voorhorst ◽  
Johannus Berkhof ◽  
Peter J.F Snijders ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 3544-3551 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. Polman ◽  
A. Oštrbenk ◽  
L. Xu ◽  
P. J. F. Snijders ◽  
C. J. L. M. Meijer ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTHuman papillomavirus (HPV) testing is increasingly being incorporated into cervical cancer screening. The Validation of HPV Genotyping Tests (VALGENT) is a framework designed to evaluate the clinical performance of various HPV tests relative to that of the validated and accepted comparator test in a formalized and uniform manner. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the HPV-Risk assay with samples from the VALGENT-3 panel and to compare its performance to that of the clinically validated Hybrid Capture 2 assay (HC2). The VALGENT-3 panel comprises 1,300 consecutive samples from women participating in routine cervical cancer screening and is enriched with 300 samples from women with abnormal cytology. DNA was extracted from original ThinPrep PreservCyt medium aliquots, and HPV testing was performed using the HPV-Risk assay by investigators blind to the clinical data. HPV prevalence was analyzed, and the clinical performance of the HPV-Risk assay for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) and CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) relative to the performance of HC2 was assessed. The sensitivity of the HPV-Risk assay for the detection of CIN3+ was similar to that of HC2 (relative sensitivity, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.05;P= 1.000), but the specificity of the HPV-Risk assay was significantly higher than that of HC2 (relative specificity, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04;P< 0.001). For the detection of CIN2+, similar results were obtained, with the relative sensitivity being 0.98 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.02;P= 0.257) and the relative specificity being 1.02 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.03;P< 0.001). The performance of the HPV-Risk assay for the detection of CIN3+ and CIN2+ was noninferior to that of HC2, with allPvalues being ≤0.006. In conclusion, the HPV-Risk assay demonstrated noninferiority to the clinically validated HC2 by the use of samples from the VALGENT-3 panel for test validation and comparison.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 35-35
Author(s):  
Chemtai Mungo ◽  
Jackton Omoto ◽  
Stephen Gwer ◽  
Akwabi Wameyo ◽  
Muruka Kays ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Women in low- and middle-income countries bear a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer incidence and mortality. WHO recommends screening with visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), followed by treatment in a screen-and-treat approach. We evaluate access to diagnostic services after referral for VIA-positive or suspicious lesions to a gynecologist-led colposcopy clinic at a major government referral and teaching hospital in Kisumu, Kenya. METHODS Data on women who were referred for colposcopy at a gynecologist clinic at the Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital with positive VIA from referral clinics from 2014 to 2017 were abstracted. We determined the proportion of referred women screening positive after colposcopy-based screening by a gynecologist, the proportion accessing diagnostic biopsy, and histologic results after positive or suspicious lesions. Treatment ascertainment is ongoing. RESULTS Four hundred five women were evaluated after referral for positive VIA screening or suspicious lesions. Mean age was 40.2 years and mean parity was 4 children, with 53% of women self-reporting positive HIV status. Two hundred thirty-three referred women (57.5%) were found to have positive or suspicious lesions after colposcopy-based screening by a gynecologist. Of these women, 147 (63%) had a biopsy performed and results were available for 110 patients (74.8%). Eighty-six women did not receive biopsy, despite positive colposcopy, primarily because of associated costs or lack of supplies. Among women with biopsy results, 25 (22.7%) were benign, 18 (16.4%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1, 9 (8.2%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3, 57 (51.8%) had squamous cell carcinoma, and 1 (0.9%) had nondiagnostic results. CONCLUSION While drawing from observational, paper-based clinical data with incomplete records, our evaluation demonstrates significant challenges in the cervical cancer prevention cascade at a tertiary referral hospital. This calls for strengthening the ability of facilities to adequately evaluate at-risk women, remove financial barriers, and invest in database systems to facilitate evaluation.


BMJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. l240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matejka Rebolj ◽  
Janet Rimmer ◽  
Karin Denton ◽  
John Tidy ◽  
Christopher Mathews ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo provide the first report on the main outcomes from the prevalence and incidence rounds of a large pilot of routine primary high risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing in England, compared with contemporaneous primary liquid based cytology screening.DesignObservational study.SettingThe English Cervical Screening Programme.Participants578 547 women undergoing cervical screening in primary care between May 2013 and December 2014, with follow-up until May 2017; 183 970 (32%) were screened with hrHPV testing.InterventionsRoutine cervical screening with hrHPV testing with liquid based cytology triage and two early recalls for women who were hrHPV positive and cytology negative, following the national screening age and interval recommendations.Main outcome measuresFrequency of referral for a colposcopy; adherence to early recall; and relative detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse from hrHPV testing compared with liquid based cytology in two consecutive screening rounds.ResultsBaseline hrHPV testing and early recall required approximately 80% more colposcopies, (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.73 to 1.82), but detected substantially more cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than liquid based cytology (1.49 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, 1.43 to 1.55; 1.44 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse, 1.36 to 1.51) and for cervical cancer (1.27, 0.99 to 1.63). Attendance at early recall and colposcopy referral were 80% and 95%, respectively. At the incidence screen, the 33 506 women screened with hrHPV testing had substantially less cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse than the 77 017 women screened with liquid based cytology (0.14, 0.09 to 0.23).ConclusionsIn England, routine primary hrHPV screening increased the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse and cervical cancer by approximately 40% and 30%, respectively, compared with liquid based cytology. The very low incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse after three years supports extending the screening interval.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document