scholarly journals The impact of current treatment modalities on the outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastases: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 146 (6) ◽  
pp. 1479-1489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P. Opijnen ◽  
Linda Dirven ◽  
Ida E.M. Coremans ◽  
Martin J.B. Taphoorn ◽  
Ellen H.W. Kapiteijn
Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (21) ◽  
pp. 3776-3789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Rulli ◽  
Lorenzo Legramandi ◽  
Lorenzo Salvati ◽  
Mario Mandala

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Parris ◽  
Subhasree Basu ◽  
Thibaut Barnoud ◽  
Yongkang Zhao ◽  
Peter Somboonsong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hussein A. Tawbi ◽  
Celine Boutros ◽  
David Kok ◽  
Caroline Robert ◽  
Grant McArthur

The remarkable advances in the systemic therapy of metastatic melanoma have now extended the 1-year overall survival rate from 25% to nearing 85%. Systemic treatment in the form of BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy is slowly but surely proving its efficacy in the treatment of metatstatic brain metastases (MBM). Single-agent BRAF inhibitors provide an intracranial response rate of 25% to 40%, whereas the combination of BRAFi/MEKi leads to responses in up to 58%. However, the durability of responses induced by BRAFi/MEKi seems to be even shorter than in extracranial disease. On the other hand, single-agent ipilimumab provides comparable clinical benefit in MBMs as it does in extracranial metastases. Single-agent PD-1 anitbodies induce response rates of approximately 20%, and those responses appear durable. Similarly the combination of CTLA-4+ PD-1 antibodies induces durable responses at an impressive rate of 55% and is safe to administer. Although the local treatment approaches with radiation and surgery remain important and are critically needed in the management of MBM, systemic therapy offers a new dimension that can augment the impact of those therapies and come at a potentially lower cost of neurocognitive impairment. Considerations for combining those modalities are direly needed, in addition to considering novel systemic combinations that target mechanisms specific to MBM. In this report, we will discuss the underlying biology of melanoma brain metastases, the clinical outcomes from recent clinical trials of targeted and immunotherapy, and their impact on clinical practice in the context of existing local therapeutic modalities.


Author(s):  
A Wolf ◽  
A Pavlick ◽  
M Wilson ◽  
J Silverman ◽  
D Kondziolka

Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of BRAF inhibitors on survival outcomes in patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for melanoma brain metastases. Methods: We prospectively collected treatment outcomes for 80 patients with melanoma brain metastases who underwent SRS. Thirty-five patients harbored the BRAF mutation (BRAF-M) and 45 patients did not (BRAF-WT). Results: The median overall survival from first SRS procedure was 11.2 months if treated with a BRAF inhibitor and 4.5 months for BRAF-WT. Actuarial survival rates for BRAF-M patients on an inhibitor were 54% and 41% at 6 and 12 months after radiosurgery, in contrast to 28% and 19% for BRAF-WT. Overall survival was extended for patients on a BRAF inhibitor if initiated at or after the first SRS. The local control rate did not differ based on BRAF status and was over 90%. Patients with higher KPS, fewer treated metastases, controlled systemic disease, RPA class 1 and BRAF-M patients had extended overall survival. Conclusions: Patients with BRAF-M treated with both SRS and BRAF inhibitors, at or after SRS, have increased overall survival. As patients live longer due to more effective systemic and local therapies, close surveillance and early management of intracranial disease with SRS will become increasingly important.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-420
Author(s):  
Yi Ge ◽  
Xuanlin Che ◽  
Xin Gao ◽  
Shuang Zhao ◽  
Juan Su

1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1553-1560 ◽  
Author(s):  
G C Rodriguez ◽  
J T Soper ◽  
A Berchuck ◽  
J Oleson ◽  
R Dodge ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Recent reports suggest an increasing incidence of CNS metastases in patients with ovarian cancer. We reviewed our experience in the management of brain metastases from ovarian carcinoma and merged our results with those of several other series reported in the literature to determine prognostic factors and the role of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1977 to 1990, 15 of 795 patients who were treated for epithelial ovarian cancer at Duke University developed brain metastases. Fourteen of the patients were treated for their brain metastases; this included radiation therapy (RT; four), surgery and RT (one), RT and systemic chemotherapy (six), and all three treatment modalities (three). A meta-analysis was performed that combined the data from the current series with those of several recent clinical series that reviewed patients with brain metastases from ovarian carcinoma (67 patients total) to elucidate the impact of treatment and extent of disease on survival. RESULTS In the current series, median survival (MS) after the diagnosis of brain metastases was 9 months. For the combined series, MS was 5 months. Thirteen patients who were treated with whole-brain RT and systemic chemotherapy (MS, 7 months), 10 patients who were treated with RT and surgery (MS, 10 months), and nine patients who were treated with all three modalities (MS, 16.5 months) had significantly longer survival than 19 patients who were treated with RT alone (MS, 3 months) (P = .05, P = .01, and P < .001, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, the only variable that provided prognostic information was treatment, namely the addition of systemic chemotherapy or surgery to RT for the treatment of brain metastases. CONCLUSION Multimodal treatment of patients with brain metastases from ovarian cancer can result in significant palliation.


Author(s):  
J. Jackson ◽  
B.H. Burmeister ◽  
E. Burmeister ◽  
M.C. Foote ◽  
J.M. Thomas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document