scholarly journals Circulating isoflavone and lignan concentrations and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from seven prospective studies including 2,828 cases and 5,593 controls

2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (11) ◽  
pp. 2677-2686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurora Perez-Cornago ◽  
Paul N. Appleby ◽  
Heiner Boeing ◽  
Leire Gil ◽  
Cecilie Kyrø ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Individual Participant Data ◽  
Individual Participant

scholarly journals Circulating Fatty Acids and Prostate Cancer Risk: Individual Participant Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca L. Crowe ◽  
Paul N. Appleby ◽  
Ruth C. Travis ◽  
Matt Barnett ◽  
Theodore M. Brasky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Fatty Acids ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Individual Participant

scholarly journals A Collaborative Analysis of Individual Participant Data from 19 Prospective Studies Assesses Circulating Vitamin D and Prostate Cancer Risk

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 274-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth C. Travis ◽  
Aurora Perez-Cornago ◽  
Paul N. Appleby ◽  
Demetrius Albanes ◽  
Corinne E. Joshu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Individual Participant Data ◽  
Individual Participant ◽  
Collaborative Analysis

scholarly journals A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data Reveals an Association between Circulating Levels of IGF-I and Prostate Cancer Risk

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (8) ◽  
pp. 2288-2300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth C. Travis ◽  
Paul N. Appleby ◽  
Richard M. Martin ◽  
Jeff M.P. Holly ◽  
Demetrius Albanes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Individual Participant Data ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Individual Participant ◽  
Circulating Levels

scholarly journals Folate intake, serum folate levels, and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Wang ◽  
Yan Zheng ◽  
Jing-Yang Huang ◽  
Ai-Qin Zhang ◽  
Yu-Hao Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Folate Intake ◽  
Serum Folate

scholarly journals Case–control and prospective studies of dietary α-linolenic acid intake and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. e002280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda J Carleton ◽  
John L Sievenpiper ◽  
Russell de Souza ◽  
Gail McKeown-Eyssen ◽  
David J A Jenkins
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Linolenic Acid ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Acid Intake

scholarly journals Re: Prospective Studies of Dairy Product and Calcium Intakes and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 98 (11) ◽  
pp. 794-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Severi ◽  
Dallas R. English ◽  
John L. Hopper ◽  
Graham G. Giles
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dairy Product ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk

Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Cheng ◽  
Bo Yang ◽  
Liwei Xu ◽  
Qiming Zheng ◽  
Guoqing Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Summary Relative Risk

Abstract Epidemiological cohort studies investigating the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer risk have yielded inconsistent results. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to update the evidence on the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer. A comprehensively literature search of relevant studies was performed in December 2019 using PubMed. A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to calculate the summary relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 15 eligible cohort studies (16 data sets) with more than four million of participants were eventually included in this meta-analysis. There was a statistically significant higher risk of prostate cancer among men who underwent vasectomy (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04–1.13) with obvious heterogeneity among included studies (P < 0.001, I2 = 64.2%). Vasectomy was also associated with the risk of advanced prostate cancer (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02–1.13), which is less likely to be affected from detection bias. In conclusion, findings from this meta-analysis of prospective studies indicate that vasectomy may be positively associated with the risk of prostate cancer. Further large prospective studies with long follow-up are warranted to verify the findings from this meta-analysis. In addition, the potential underlying molecular mechanism needed further exploration with in vitro and animal studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document