scholarly journals The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30, version 3.0) in terminally ill cancer patients under palliative care: Validity and reliability in a Hellenic sample

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriaki Mystakidou ◽  
Eleni Tsilika ◽  
Efi Parpa ◽  
Ourania Kalaidopoulou ◽  
Vassilios Smyrniotis ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woung-Ru Tang ◽  
Chen-Yi Kao

AbstractObjective:The spiritual well-being of terminally ill cancer patients is an important indicator of the quality of their lives and of the quality of hospice care, but no validated tools are available for assessing this indicator in Taiwan.Method:The present cross-sectional study validated the Spiritual Well-Being Scale–Mandarin version (SWBS–M) by testing its psychometric properties in 243 cancer patients from five teaching hospitals throughout Taiwan. Construct validity was tested by factor analysis and hypothesis testing. Patients' spiritual well-being and quality of life were assessed using the SWBS–M and the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQoL), respectively.Results:Overall, the SWBS–M had an internal consistency/reliability of 0.89. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the SWBS–M had an underlying two-factor structure, explaining 46.94% of the variance. SWBS–M scores correlated moderately with MQoL scores (r = 0.48, p < 0.01). Terminally ill cancer patients' spiritual well-being was inversely related to their average pain level during the previous 24 hours (r = –0.183, p = 0.006). Cancer patients' spiritual well-being also differed significantly with their experience of pain (t = –3.67, p < 0.001); terminally ill cancer patients with pain during the previous 24 hours had a lower sense of spiritual well-being than those without pain.Significance of results:Our findings support a two-factor model for the SWBS–M in terminally ill Taiwanese cancer patients. We recommend testing the psychometric properties of the SWBS–M in different patient populations to verify its factorial structure in other Asian countries.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Zhafirah Ramadhanty ◽  
Kristanto Yuli Yarsa ◽  
Ari Probandari

Background: The number of breast cancer patients in Indonesia is increasing but there are still only a few researches that assess their quality of life. RAND SF-36 is a quality of life instrument that is widely used. In Indonesia, the validity and reliability of the instrument is still under development, especially in breast cancer patients. Various health status questionnaires have been used in physical rehabilitation studies involving patient with pacemaker, but for women with breast cancer, the usefulness of these questionnaires as measures of physical, mental, and social well-being has not been firmly established. Methods: A previously validated RAND SF-36 questionnaire in patients with pacemaker was given to 252 breast cancer survivor community members. We assessed the construct validity and the reliability by referring to its Pearson’s r table value and Cronbach’s α coefficient. Results: One hundred and fourteen breast cancer survivor community members participated and completed all 36 questions of the instrument between September- November 2018. Questions number 2, 28, and 35 showed lower Pearson’s r value (r<0,300) than other questions but still showed r value of >0.1548 indicating that these questions were valid. Cronbach’s α coefficient >0.90 indicated good internal consistency. Conclusions: The Indonesian version of the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire is a suitable instrument and can be used for research in Indonesian breast cancer patients.


Author(s):  
Li-Fang Chang ◽  
Li-Fen Wu ◽  
Chi-Kang Lin ◽  
Ching-Liang Ho ◽  
Yu-Chun Hung ◽  
...  

This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of an inpatient hospice palliative care unit (PCU) and palliative consultation service (PCS) on comprehensive quality of life outcome (CoQoLo) among terminally ill cancer patients. This was a prospective longitudinal study. Terminally ill cancer patients who met the inclusion criteria and received PCU or PCS in a northern Taiwanese medical center were recruited. The CoQoLo Inventory was used to measure CoQoLo level pre- and seven days following hospice care between August 2018 and October 2019. A total of 90 patients completed the study. No significant differences were found in CoQoLo levels between the PCU and PCS groups pre- and seven days following care. However, the CoQoLo level of patients significantly improved seven days following care in both PCU and PCS groups, compared with pre-hospice care. Patients’ age, religious belief, marital status, closeness with family, palliative prognostic index (PPI), and symptom severity were significant concerning CoQoLo levels after adjusting for patients’ baseline characteristics. PCU and PCS showed no difference in CoQoLo levels, but both of them can improve CoQoLo among terminally ill cancer patients. These patients could receive PCU or PCS to achieve a good CoQoLo at the end-of-life stage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document