scholarly journals Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for organic contaminants

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Lydy ◽  
Peter F Landrum ◽  
Amy MP Oen ◽  
Mayumi Allinson ◽  
Foppe Smedes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organic Contaminants ◽  
Passive Sampling ◽  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Contaminated Sediments ◽  
State Of The Science

scholarly journals Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for metals

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willie JGM Peijnenburg ◽  
Peter R Teasdale ◽  
Danny Reible ◽  
Julie Mondon ◽  
William W Bennett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Passive Sampling ◽  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Contaminated Sediments ◽  
State Of The Science

scholarly journals Review of polyoxymethylene passive sampling methods for quantifying freely dissolved porewater concentrations of hydrophobic organic contaminants

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 710-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Peter H. Arp ◽  
Sarah E. Hale ◽  
Marie Elmquist Kruså ◽  
Gerard Cornelissen ◽  
Carol B. Grabanski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organic Contaminants ◽  
Passive Sampling ◽  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Hydrophobic Organic Contaminants

scholarly journals Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: Scientific rationale supporting use of freely dissolved concentrations

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Mayer ◽  
Thomas F Parkerton ◽  
Rachel G Adams ◽  
John G Cargill ◽  
Jay Gan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Passive Sampling ◽  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Contaminated Sediments ◽  
Scientific Rationale

scholarly journals Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: Practical guidance for selection, calibration, and implementation

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upal Ghosh ◽  
Susan Kane Driscoll ◽  
Robert M Burgess ◽  
Michiel TO Jonker ◽  
Danny Reible ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Passive Sampling ◽  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Contaminated Sediments ◽  
Practical Guidance

scholarly journals Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: Risk assessment and management

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc S Greenberg ◽  
Peter M Chapman ◽  
Ian J Allan ◽  
Kim A Anderson ◽  
Sabine E Apitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Passive Sampling ◽  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Contaminated Sediments ◽  
Risk Assessment And Management

scholarly journals Metal measurement in aquatic environments by passive sampling methods: Lessons learning from an in situ intercomparison exercise

2016 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 299-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dabrin ◽  
J.-P. Ghestem ◽  
E. Uher ◽  
J.-L. Gonzalez ◽  
I.J. Allan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Passive Sampling ◽  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Aquatic Environments ◽  
Intercomparison Exercise

Passive Sampling of Atmospheric Organic Contaminants

2012 ◽  
pp. 201-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.A. Esteve-Turrillas ◽  
A. Pastor ◽  
M. de la Guardia
Keyword(s):  
Organic Contaminants ◽  
Passive Sampling

scholarly journals Passive sampling of organic contaminants across the water-sediment interface of an urban stream

2019 ◽  
Vol 165 ◽  
pp. 114966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Mechelke ◽  
Etiënne L.M. Vermeirssen ◽  
Juliane Hollender
Keyword(s):  
Organic Contaminants ◽  
Passive Sampling ◽  
Urban Stream ◽  
Sediment Interface

The State of Bee Monitoring in the United States: A Call to Refocus Away From Bowl Traps and Towards More Effective Methods

2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 337-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary M Portman ◽  
Bethanne Bruninga-Socolar ◽  
Daniel P Cariveau
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Passive Sampling ◽  
Sampling Methods ◽  
The United States ◽  
Limited Resources ◽  
Native Bees ◽  
Robust Detection ◽  
Current State ◽  
Bee Abundance ◽  
Meaningful Data

Abstract Effective monitoring is necessary to provide robust detection of bee declines. In the United States and worldwide, bowl traps have been increasingly used to monitor native bees and purportedly detect declines. However, bowl traps have a suite of flaws that make them poorly equipped to monitor bees. We outline the drawbacks of bowl traps, as well as other passive sampling methods. We emphasize that current methods do not monitor changes in bee abundance. We then propose future approaches to improve bee monitoring efforts, which include improving our understanding of the efficacy and drawbacks of current methods, novel molecular methods, nest censusing, mark-recapture, sampling of focal plant taxa, and detection of range contractions. Overall, we hope to highlight deficiencies of the current state of bee monitoring, with an aim to stimulate research into the efficacy of existing methods and promote novel methods that provide meaningful data that can detect declines without squandering limited resources.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document