Flood frequency analysis of Turkey using L-moments method

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (22) ◽  
pp. 3499-3505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neslihan Seckin ◽  
Tefaruk Haktanir ◽  
Recep Yurtal
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Moments Method ◽  
L Moments

Handling non-stationary flood frequency analysis using TL-moments approach for estimation parameter

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 966-979
Author(s):  
Nur Amalina Mat Jan ◽  
Ani Shabri ◽  
Ruhaidah Samsudin
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Moment Method ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Moments Method ◽  
Flood Estimation ◽  
L Moments ◽  
Flood Quantiles ◽  
Quantile Estimates

Abstract Non-stationary flood frequency analysis (NFFA) plays an important role in addressing the issue of the stationary assumption (independent and identically distributed flood series) that is no longer valid in infrastructure-designed methods. This confirms the necessity of developing new statistical models in order to identify the change of probability functions over time and obtain a consistent flood estimation method in NFFA. The method of Trimmed L-moments (TL-moments) with time covariate is confronted with the L-moment method for the stationary and non-stationary generalized extreme value (GEV) models. The aims of the study are to investigate the behavior of the proposed TL-moments method in the presence of NFFA and applying the method along with GEV distribution. Comparisons of the methods are made by Monte Carlo simulations and bootstrap-based method. The simulation study showed the better performance of most levels of TL-moments method, which is TL(η,0), (η = 2, 3, 4) than the L-moment method for all models (GEV1, GEV2, and GEV3). The TL-moment method provides more efficient quantile estimates than other methods in flood quantiles estimated at higher return periods. Thus, the TL-moments method can produce better estimation results since the L-moment eliminates lowest value and gives more weight to the largest value which provides important information.

Performance of L-moments and nonparametric flood frequency analysis

1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 856-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Gingras ◽  
Kaz Adamowski
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Extreme Value Distribution ◽  
Nonparametric Methods ◽  
Extreme Value ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Value Distribution ◽  
Generalized Extreme Value Distribution ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Generalized Extreme Value ◽  
L Moments

A simulation study was undertaken to compare parametric L-moments and nonparametric approaches in flood frequency analysis. Data of various sample lengths were generated from a given generalized extreme value distribution and the quantiles estimated using the fixed-kernel nonparametric method and from a generalized extreme value distribution fitted by L-moments. From the resulting root-mean-square errors for various quantiles, it was concluded for unimodal distributions that nonparametric methods are preferable for large return period floods estimated from short (<30 years) samples while parametric methods are preferable in other circumstances. It was also pointed out that nonparametric methods are more suitable for mixed distributions. Key words: frequency analysis, L-moments, nonparametric methods, simulation.

scholarly journals Flood Frequency Analysis by Wakeby and Kappa Distributions Using L-Moments

2006 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 17-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Jin Maeng ◽  
Soon-Hyuk Lee ◽  
Hyeon-Gyu Lee ◽  
Kyong-Sik Ryu ◽  
Gi-Heon Song
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
L Moments
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document