Estimation of spatially distributed surface energy fluxes using remotely-sensed data for agricultural fields

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 2653-2670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assefa M. Melesse ◽  
Vijay Nangia
2003 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew N. French ◽  
Thomas J. Schmugge ◽  
William P. Kustas ◽  
Kaye L. Brubaker ◽  
John Prueger

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 5021-5046 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Guzinski ◽  
H. Nieto ◽  
R. Jensen ◽  
G. Mendiguren

Abstract. In this study we evaluate a methodology for disaggregating land surface energy fluxes estimated with the Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB)-based Dual-Temperature Difference (DTD) model which uses day and night polar orbiting satellite observations of land surface temperature (LST) as a remotely sensed input. The DTD model is run with MODIS input data at a spatial resolution of around 1 km while the disaggregation uses Landsat observations to produce fluxes at a nominal spatial resolution of 30 m. The higher-resolution modelled fluxes can be directly compared against eddy covariance (EC)-based flux tower measurements to ensure more accurate model validation and also provide a better visualization of the fluxes' spatial patterns in heterogeneous areas allowing for development of, for example, more efficient irrigation practices. The disaggregation technique is evaluated in an area covered by the Danish Hydrological Observatory (HOBE), in the west of the Jutland peninsula, and the modelled fluxes are compared against measurements from two flux towers: the first one in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape and the second one in a homogeneous conifer plantation. The results indicate that the coarse-resolution DTD fluxes disaggregated at Landsat scale have greatly improved accuracy as compared to high-resolution fluxes derived directly with Landsat data without the disaggregation. At the agricultural site the disaggregated fluxes display small bias and very high correlation (r ≈ 0.95) with EC-based measurements, while at the plantation site the results are encouraging but still with significant errors. In addition, we introduce a~modification to the DTD model by replacing the "parallel" configuration of the resistances to sensible heat exchange by the "series" configuration. The latter takes into account the in-canopy air temperature and substantially improves the accuracy of the DTD model.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Rabin ◽  
Barbara A. Burns ◽  
Chris Collimore ◽  
George R. Diak ◽  
William Raymond

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Alexandridis ◽  
A. Panagopoulos ◽  
G. Galanis ◽  
I. Alexiou ◽  
I. Cherif ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 4857-4908 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Guzinski ◽  
H. Nieto ◽  
R. Jensen ◽  
G. Mendiguren

Abstract. In this study we evaluate a methodology for disaggregating land surface energy fluxes estimated with the Dual Time Difference (DTD) model which uses the day and night polar orbiting satellites observations of Land Surface Temperature (LST) as a remotely sensed input. The DTD model is run with MODIS input data at a spatial resolution of around 1 km while the disaggregation uses Landsat observations of LST to produce fluxes at a nominal spatial resolution of 30 m. The higher resolution modeled fluxes can be directly compared against eddy-covariance based flux tower measurements to ensure more accurate model validation and also provide a better visualization of fluxes' spatial patterns in heterogeneous areas allowing for development of, for example, more efficient irrigation practices. The disaggregation technique is evaluated in an area covered by the Danish Hydrological Observatory (HOBE), in the west of the Jutland peninsula, and the modeled fluxes are compared against measurements from two flux towers: first one in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape and second one in a homogeneous conifer plantation. The results indicate that the disaggregated fluxes have greatly improved accuracy as compared to high resolution fluxes derived directly with Landsat data without the disaggregation. At the agricultural site the disaggregated fluxes display negligible bias and almost perfect correlation (r > 0.90) with Eddy Covariance based measurements, while at the plantation site the results are encouraging but not ideal. In addition we introduce a modification to the DTD model by replacing the "parallel" configuration of the resistances to sensible heat exchange by the "series" configuration. The later takes into account the in-canopy air temperature and substantially improves the accuracy of the DTD model.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1443-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Frankenstein ◽  
Anne Sawyer ◽  
Julie Koeberle

Abstract Numerical experiments of snow accumulation and depletion were carried out as well as surface energy fluxes over four Cold Land Processes Experiment (CLPX) sites in Colorado using the Snow Thermal model (SNTHERM) and the Fast All-Season Soil Strength model (FASST). SNTHERM is a multilayer snow model developed to describe changes in snow properties as a function of depth and time, using a one-dimensional mass and energy balance. The model is intended for seasonal snow covers and addresses conditions found throughout the winter, from initial ground freezing in the fall to snow ablation in the spring. It has been used by many researchers over a variety of terrains. FASST is a newly developed one-dimensional dynamic state-of-the-ground model. It calculates the ground’s moisture content, ice content, temperature, and freeze–thaw profiles as well as soil strength and surface ice and snow accumulation/depletion. Because FASST is newer and not as well known, the authors wanted to determine its use as a snow model by comparing it with SNTHERM, one of the most established snow models available. It is demonstrated that even though FASST is only a single-layer snow model, the RMSE snow depth compared very favorably against SNTHERM, often performing better during the accumulation phase. The surface energy fluxes calculated by the two models were also compared and were found to be similar.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document