scholarly journals Reports from the fifth edition of CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1197-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaia Andreoletti ◽  
Lipika R. Pal ◽  
John Moult ◽  
Steven E. Brenner
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1182-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxana Daneshjou ◽  
Yanran Wang ◽  
Yana Bromberg ◽  
Samuele Bovo ◽  
Pier L Martelli ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1039-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger A Hoskins ◽  
Susanna Repo ◽  
Daniel Barsky ◽  
Gaia Andreoletti ◽  
John Moult ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1314-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory McInnes ◽  
Roxana Daneshjou ◽  
Panagiostis Katsonis ◽  
Olivier Lichtarge ◽  
Rajgopal Srinivasan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Cao ◽  
Yuanfei Sun ◽  
Mostafa Karimi ◽  
Haoran Chen ◽  
Oluwaseyi Moronfoye ◽  
...  

Quickly growing genetic variation data of unknown clinical significance demand computational methods that can reliably predict clinical phenotypes and deeply unravel molecular mechanisms. On the platform enabled by CAGI (Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation), we develop a novel “weakly supervised” regression (WSR) model that not only predicts precise clinical significance (probability of pathogenicity) from inexact training annotations (class of pathogenicity) but also infers underlying molecular mechanisms in a variant-specific fashion. Compared to multi-class logistic regression, a representative multi-class classifier, our kernelized WSR improves the performance for the ENIGMA Challenge set from 0.72 to 0.97 in binary AUC (Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve) and from 0.64 to 0.80 in ordinal multi-class AUC. WSR model interpretation and protein structural interpretation reach consensus in corroborating the most probable molecular mechanisms by which some pathogenic BRCA1 variants confer clinical significance, namely metal-binding disruption for C44F and C47Y, protein-binding disruption for M18T, and structure destabilization for S1715N.


2017 ◽  
pp. 136-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Gazman

If we want securitization to become one of the main channels to attract funding in leasing activity, as the Bank of Russia predicts, one needs to revise some stereotypes. Relying on foreign and domestic research, the author gives a critical assessment of the postulate of the need for uniformity of securitized assets; proves that real estate, contrary to the traditional approach, rather than equipment and transport, prevails in securitization transactions, and explains why this happens. The article presents a new perspective on the behavior of issu- ers concerning the timing of securities circulation; considers feasibility approach to the calculation of variable character of leverage in leasing; explains pro and contra of evaluating the leasing market based on the volume of the portfolio of contracts; reveals the validity of ratings of bonds issued in the course of secu- ritization of leasing assets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document