scholarly journals Assessment and follow up of bone mineral density using CT attenuation measurements in Hodgkin lymphoma patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
B. Cohen ◽  
V. Vainstein ◽  
N. Hiller
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 869-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bar Cohen ◽  
Nurith Hiller ◽  
Auryan Szalat ◽  
Vladimir Vainstein

Objective: Bone density loss and increased risk for osteoporosis are of concern in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. Routinely performed positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scans could be informative in assessing bone mineral density (BMD). Methods: This retrospective study included 80 adults with newly diagnosed HL treated with standard first-line chemotherapy regimens. PET-CT scans performed at diagnosis (PET-CT1), at the end of chemotherapy (PET-CT2), and at follow-up after remission (PET-CT3) were used to assess BMD changes by measuring lumbar vertebrae CT attenuation. A CT attenuation threshold of 160 Hounsfield units was used to define abnormal BMD. Results: Following chemotherapy, comparison of PET-CT2 with PET-CT1 revealed a mean (standard deviation) 14.2% (10.4%) BMD reduction ( P<.001). On PET-CT3 performed at 14.6 (3.25) months after the last course of chemotherapy, a slight improvement (4.6% [10.4%]) in comparison to PET-CT2 was noted. Twelve patients (15%) converted from normal baseline BMD on PET-CT1 to abnormal BMD after chemotherapy on PET-CT2. Age, baseline BMD, and steroid cumulative dose were associated with BMD decline and risk for abnormal BMD after chemotherapy. No clinical fractures were reported, and only one rib fracture was incidentally captured (1.25%). Conclusion: HL patients treated with common first-line chemotherapies demonstrate a significant decline in bone density on routine PET-CT scans. Opportunistic use of PET-CT scan has the potential to detect HL patients at high risk for developing osteoporosis and to guide clinicians regarding monitoring and intervention. Abbreviations: BMD = bone mineral density; CT = computed tomography; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; HL = Hodgkin lymphoma; HU = Hounsfield units; L = lumbarvertebra; PET-CT = positron emission tomography-computed tomography; T = thoracic vertebra


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingo Dominguez Maria Luisa de ◽  
Sonsoles Guadalix Iglesias ◽  
Maria Begona Lopez Alvarez ◽  
Guillermo Martinez Diaz-Guerra ◽  
Federico Hawkins Carranza

Author(s):  
Gabriella Martino ◽  
Federica Bellone ◽  
Carmelo M. Vicario ◽  
Agostino Gaudio ◽  
Andrea Caputo ◽  
...  

Clinical psychological factors may predict medical diseases. Anxiety level has been associated with osteoporosis, but its role on bone mineral density (BMD) change is still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the association between anxiety levels and both adherence and treatment response to oral bisphosphonates (BPs) in postmenopausal osteoporosis. BMD and anxiety levels were evaluated trough dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), respectively. Participants received weekly medication with alendronate or risedronate and were grouped according to the HAM-A scores into tertiles (HAM-A 3 > HAM-A 2 > HAM-A 1). After 24 months, BMD changes were different among the HAM-A tertiles. The median lumbar BMD change was significantly greater in both the HAM-A 2 and HAM-A 3 in comparison with the HAM-A 1. The same trend was observed for femoral BMD change. Adherence to BPs was >75% in 68% of patients in the HAM-A 1, 79% of patients in the HAM-A 2, and 89% of patients in the HAM-A 3 (p = 0.0014). After correcting for age, body mass index, depressive symptoms, and the 10-yr. probability of osteoporotic fractures, anxiety levels independently predicted lumbar BMD change (β = 0.3417, SE 0.145, p = 0.02). In conclusion, women with higher anxiety levels reported greater BMD improvement, highlighting that anxiety was associated with adherence and response to osteoporosis medical treatment, although further research on this topic is needed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 839-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Heijckmann ◽  
M. Drent ◽  
B. Dumitrescu ◽  
J. De Vries ◽  
A. C. Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. S81
Author(s):  
C. Blomqvist ◽  
L. Vehmanen ◽  
H. Sievänen ◽  
P. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen ◽  
R. Nikander ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document