scholarly journals BRENTUXIMAB-VEDOTIN AND BENDAMUSTINE IS A FEASIBLE AND EFFECTIVE DRUG COMBINATION AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF HODGKIN LYMPHOMA IN THE ELDERLY (HALO TRIAL).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 170-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gallamini ◽  
F. Bijou ◽  
J. Viotti ◽  
A. Rossi ◽  
A. Perrot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Drug Combination ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Effective Drug ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Brentuximab vedotin and bendamustine as first-line treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma in the elderly (HALO Trial).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8029-8029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Marc Schiano de Colella ◽  
Simonetta Viviani ◽  
Davide Rapezzi ◽  
CATERINA PATTI ◽  
Lauriane Clement Filliatre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Real Life ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Secondary Malignancy ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Cmv Reactivation ◽  
First Line Treatment

8029 Background: Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) treatment in the elderly is a challenge, as standard ABVD is able to cure no more than 60% of the patients (p.). Bendamustine (Be), and Brentuximab Vedotin (BV), are well-tolerated and effective drugs in relapsing HL, but only preliminary data exist in 1st line treatment of the elderly (Evens AM 2018). Methods: HALO is a prospective international multicenter open-label phase I/II study (NCT02467946) to assess the safety and efficacy of Be-BV in advanced-stage elderly HL p. Briefly, BV 1.2 mg/kg on D1, and Be 90 mg/m2 on D1-2 were administered Q3W for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was the feasibility and the efficacy of Be-BV. Results: Between July 2015 and February 2019, 59/60 p. consecutive enrolled received at least 1 Be-BV cycle, and are valuable for primary endpoint. One p. was excluded because a histological review showing angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma. The mean age was 70.32 (62-79), and M/F ratio 41/18. The Ann-Arbor stage was IIB in 12, III in 14 and IV in 33 patients, B-symptoms (y/n) 40/19. IPS was 0-2 in 19 and ≥ 3 in 40 p., P.S. (ECOG) was 0-1 in 53, 2 in 6 p., nonetheless most of them were frail, as ADL was ≥ 6 in 47 (79%) and IADL was ≥ 8 in 42 (71%) p. Most frequent co-morbidities were cardio-vascular disease (45) metabolism disorders (31) prostatic adenoma (11). 163 treatment-related adverse events (WHO 3-4) were recorded: neutropenia and lymphopenia, (134), infections (7), cutaneous reactions (5), liver toxicity (2). No case of grade > 2 peripheral neuropathy was recorded. Out of 59 p., 41 concluded and 18 interrupted the treatment for toxicity (8), progression (5), treatment failure (2), CMV reactivation (3). The latter was recorded in 17 p., 12/17 received valgancyclovir. 4 p. died with CMV viremia. After a mean follow-up of 20.6 (0.3-46.5) months, 37/59 (63%) were in CR, while 22 (37%) have progressed (5) or relapsed (17). The 2-y OS and PFS in ITT analysis were 83% (95% CI 71-96) and 54% (95% CI 41-72) and in PP 89% (95%CI 75-100) and 78% (95%CI 64-96), respectively. 22 p. had a PFS event: 5 progression (2 deaths), 17 relapse (8 deaths). 10 p. died for recurrent HL (5), sepsis (1), secondary malignancy (2), respiratory insufficiency (1) and unknown (1). Conclusions: The Be-BV combination, a novel anthracycline-free regiment for first line treatment of HL in elderly, proved effective in unselected, frail, poor-risk, HL p. aged more than 60 in daily hospital real life. The CMV reactivation is frequent and should be treated with preemptive antiviral therapy upon detection of CMV DNA in plasma. Clinical trial information: NCT02467946 .

Clinicopathological Features of Nodular Sclerosis-Type Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma In the Elderly: Multicenter Study of Hodgkin Lymphoma In Japan

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2677-2677
Author(s):  
Naoko Asano ◽  
Tomohiro Kinoshita ◽  
Koichi Ohshima ◽  
Tadashi Yoshino ◽  
Nozomi Niitsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 2677 Background: Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL), which is characterized by the presence of Hodgkin and Reed Sternberg (H-RS) cells in a background of non-neoplastic inflammatory cells, is divided into four histological subgroups, nodular sclerosis (NSCHL), mixed cellularity (MCCHL), lymphocyte-rich, and lymphocyte depletion. While NSCHL in young adults is characterized by a mediastinal mass and good prognosis, the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCHL in the elderly (NSCHL-e) remain uncertain. Patients and methods: Enrolled patients were diagnosed with CHL between 1986 and 2006 as part of the Hodgkin Lymphoma's Multicenter Study Group. To better characterize NSCHL-e, we compared the clinicopathological profiles of 84 NSCHL-e patients aged 50 or over with 237 NSCHL-y patients aged 49 or younger and 302 with MCCHL. Results: The total of 743 CHL patients consisted of 496 men and 247 women with a median age of 48 years (range, 15– 89 years). The pathological diagnoses were NSCHL in 324 patients (43%) and MCCHL in 303 (41%). NSCHL patients showed a bimodal age distribution, with an initial peak in their 20s and a second small peak in their 60s. We categorized the former as NSCHL-y (49 or younger) and the latter as NSCHL-e (50 and over). NSCHL-e patients were characterized by male predominance and a more advanced clinical stage (53%) than NSCHL-y. Immunophenotypically, H-RS cells had the prototypic immunophenotype of CD15+ CD30+ and Pax5+. NSCHL-e cases showed a significantly higher rate of CD20 (24%) than NSCHL-y (8%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, H-RS cells in 29 of 75 (39%) patients with NSCHL-e were positive for EBV RNA transcripts by in situ hybridization, whereas only 7% of NSCHL-y cases were EBER-positive (P < 0.0001) (Table). Regarding NSCHL-e and MCCHL, no significant difference between these patients was seen in clinical characteristics. Immunophenotypically, NSCHL-e patients showed significantly higher rates for CD3 and TIA-1, while MCCHL patients showed higher EBV positivity (75%). Fifty-five of 63 patients received systemic multi-agent chemotherapy as first-line treatment, consisting of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbacin (ABVD) in 38 patients; CHOP in 8; C-MOPP in 8; and BEACOPP in 1. Overall, 51 patients responded to first-line treatment, 39 with complete response and 12 with partial response. Disease-specific survival of NSCHL-e was poorer than that of NSCHL-y (P < 0.001) but similar to that of MCCHL (P = 0.43) (Figure). Conclusion: NSCHL-e is characterized by an unfavorable prognosis and different clinicopathological features to NSCHL-y, which is considered as typical NSCHL. A number of cases of NSCHL-e might have been associated with MCCHL, with most being EBV-positive. These results suggest the limitations of current histological subgroupings for CHL. Disclosures: Matsushita: Pfizer CO.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter Co.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Cure at what (systemic) financial cost? Integrating novel therapies into first-line Hodgkin lymphoma treatment

Hematology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 252-259
Author(s):  
Scott F. Huntington
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
Novel Therapies ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Multiagent Chemotherapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) stands out as success story in the field of medical oncology, with multiagent chemotherapy with or without radiation leading to durable remission for most patients. Large-scale clinical trials during the past 40 years have sought to minimize toxicities while maintaining strong efficacy, including efforts to reduce the size of radiation fields, minimize alkylator chemotherapy, reduce the number of chemotherapy cycles, and omit radiation in select populations. The last decade has also ushered in novel therapies, including brentuximab vedotin (BV), that have improved clinical outcomes for patients with cHL resistant to standard cytotoxic therapies. More recently, a large randomized trial compared BV plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced stage cHL. With ∼24 months of available follow-up, the BV containing regimen was found to be associated with a reduction in the risk of progression, death, or incomplete response to first-line treatment (modified progression-free survival). Whether this early signal of improved efficacy is worth the additional acute toxicities and added drug-related expenses associated with incorporating BV into first-line treatment remains controversial. This chapter provides historical background; reviews the cost-effectiveness of available cHL therapies; and summarizes potential ways to balance innovation, affordability, and patient access to novel therapeutics.

scholarly journals Review of Treatment Options for the Management of Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3745
Author(s):  
Hélène Vellemans ◽  
Marc P. E. André
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Western World ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Remission Rates ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Line Treatment

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a lymphoid-type hematologic disease that is derived from B cells. The incidence of this lymphoid malignancy is around 2–3/100,000/year in the western world. Long-term remission rates are linked to a risk-adapted approach, which allows remission rates higher than 80%. The first-line treatment for advanced stage classical HL (cHL) widely used today is doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) or escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPesc) chemotherapy. Randomized studies comparing these two regimens and a recently performed meta-analysis have demonstrated consistently better disease control with BEACOPPesc. However, this treatment is not the standard of care, as there is an excess of acute hematological toxicities and therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Moreover, there is a recurrent controversy concerning the impact on overall survival with this regimen. More recently, new drugs such as brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors have become available and have been evaluated in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced cHL with the objective of tumor control improvement. There are still major debates with respect to first-line treatment of advanced cHL. The use of positron emission tomography-adapted strategies has allowed a reduction in the toxicity of chemotherapy regimens. Incorporation of new drugs into the treatment algorithms requires confirmation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document