Retrospective memory integration accompanies reconfiguration of neural cell assemblies

Hippocampus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Wang ◽  
Yaling Deng ◽  
Lihong Cao ◽  
Jiahong Zhang ◽  
Lei Yang
Keyword(s):  
Neural Cell ◽  
Retrospective Memory ◽  
Cell Assemblies ◽  
Memory Integration

Design-Effects in Prospective and Retrospective Memory for Actions

2003 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Jahn ◽  
Johannes Engelkamp
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Prospective Memory Task ◽  
Retrospective Memory ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Relational Information ◽  
Design Effects ◽  
Verbal Tasks ◽  
Within Subjects

There is ample evidence that memory for action phrases such as “open the bottle” is better in subject-performed tasks (SPTs), i.e., if the participants perform the actions, than in verbal tasks (VTs), if they only read the phrases or listen to them. It is less clear whether also the sole intention to perform the actions later, i.e., a prospective memory task (PT), improves memory compared with VTs. Inconsistent findings have been reported for within-subjects and between-subjects designs. The present study attempts to clarify the situation. In three experiments, better recall for SPTs than for PTs and for PTs than for VTs were observed if mixed lists were used. If pure lists were used, there was a PT effect but no SPT over PT advantage. The findings were discussed from the perspective of item-specific and relational information.

Resist forgetting: Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise on prospective and retrospective memory.

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie Cuttler ◽  
Christopher P. Connolly ◽  
Emily M. LaFrance ◽  
Tanner M. Lowry
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Retrospective Memory

Memory Integration Processing Questionnaire

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Zetsche ◽  
Thomas Ehring ◽  
Anke Ehlers
Keyword(s):  
Memory Integration

Activity of Aqueous Extracts of Lion's Mane Mushroom Hericium erinaceus (Bull.: Fr.) Pers. (Aphyllophoromycetideae) on the Neural Cell Line NG108-15

2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah-Hui Wong ◽  
Sabaratnam Vikineswary ◽  
Noorlidah Abdullah ◽  
Murali Naidu ◽  
Roger Keynes
Keyword(s):  
Cell Line ◽  
Neural Cell ◽  
Aqueous Extracts ◽  
Hericium Erinaceus

The art of planning ahead: when do we prepare for the future and when is it effective? (under review)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Huijser ◽  
Niels Anne Taatgen ◽  
Marieke K. van Vugt
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Dual Task ◽  
Task Difficulty ◽  
Memory Load ◽  
Working Memory Load ◽  
Task Preparation ◽  
Memory Integration ◽  
The Future ◽  
Dual Task Paradigm ◽  
Consistent Support

Preparing for the future during ongoing activities is an essential skill. Yet, it is currently unclear to what extent we can prepare for the future in parallel with another task. In two experiments, we investigated how characteristics of a present task influenced whether and when participants prepared for the future, as well as its usefulness. We focused on the influence of concurrent working memory load, assuming that working memory would interfere most strongly with preparation. In both experiments, participants performed a novel sequential dual-task paradigm, in which they could voluntary prepare for a second task while performing a first task. We identified task preparation by means of eye tracking, through detecting when participants switched their gaze from the first to the second task. The results showed that participants prepared productively, as evidenced by faster RTs on the second task, with only a small cost to the present task. The probability of preparation and its productiveness decreased with general increases in present task difficulty. In contrast to our prediction, we found some but no consistent support for influence of concurrent working memory load on preparation. Only for concurrent high working memory load (i.e., two items in memory), we observed strong interference with preparation. We conclude that preparation is affected by present task difficulty, potentially due to decreased opportunities for preparation and changes in multitasking strategy. Furthermore, the interference from holding two items may reflect that concurrent preparation is compromised when working memory integration is required by both processes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document