Patient‐Reported Outcomes in HCC: A Scoping Review by the Practice Metrics Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

Hepatology ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Serper ◽  
Neehar D. Parikh ◽  
Grace Thiele ◽  
Nadia Ovchinsky ◽  
Shivang Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
American Association ◽  
Patient Reported

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Sarcoma: A scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 101897
Author(s):  
Ana Almeida ◽  
Teresa Martins ◽  
Lígia Lima
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Use of mHealth Technology for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Community-Dwelling Adults with Acquired Brain Injuries: A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 2173
Author(s):  
Shannon B. Juengst ◽  
Lauren Terhorst ◽  
Andrew Nabasny ◽  
Tracey Wallace ◽  
Jennifer A. Weaver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Brain Injuries ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Affective Symptoms ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Mhealth Technology ◽  
Ecological Momentary

The purpose of our scoping review was to describe the current use of mHealth technology for long-term assessment of patient-reported outcomes in community-dwelling individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of literature meeting these criteria: (1) civilians or military veterans, all ages; (2) self-reported or caregiver-reported outcomes assessed via mobile device in the community (not exclusively clinic/hospital); (3) published in English; (4) published in 2015–2019. We searched Ovid MEDLINE(R) < 1946 to 16 August 2019, MEDLINE InProcess, EPub, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for articles. Thirteen manuscripts representing 12 distinct studies were organized by type of ABI [traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke] to extract outcomes, mHealth technology used, design, and inclusion of ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Outcomes included post-concussive, depressive, and affective symptoms, fatigue, daily activities, stroke risk factors, and cognitive exertion. Overall, collecting patient-reported outcomes via mHealth was feasible and acceptable in the chronic ABI population. Studies consistently showed advantage for using EMA despite variability in EMA timing/schedules. To ensure best clinical measurement, research on post-ABI outcomes should consider EMA designs (versus single time-point assessments) that provide the best timing schedules for their respective aims and outcomes and that leverage mHealth for data collection.

The role of exercise in improving patient‐reported outcomes in individuals on dialysis: A scoping review

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Bohm ◽  
Kara Schick‐Makaroff ◽  
Jennifer M. MacRae ◽  
Maria Tan ◽  
Stephanie Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Are patient-reported outcomes useful in post-treatment follow-up care for women with early breast cancer? A scoping review

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathrine Lundgaard Riis ◽  
Troels Bechmann ◽  
Pernille Tine Jensen ◽  
Angela Coulter ◽  
Karina Dahl Steffensen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Follow Up Care

Prognostic disclosure: A scoping review on communication guidelines and their application in oncology.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24107-e24107
Author(s):  
Julie R Bloom ◽  
Deborah Catherine Marshall ◽  
Carlos Rodriguez-Russo ◽  
Emily J Martin ◽  
Joshua Adam Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Core Competency ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Literature Searches ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Randomized Control

e24107 Background: Prognostic disclosure is essential to informed decision making in oncology, yet many oncologists are unsure how to successfully facilitate this discussion. This scoping review determines what prognostic communication guidelines exist, compares and contrasts these guidelines and explores the supporting evidence. Methods: A protocol was created using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols extension for Scoping Reviews. Comprehensive literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL were performed to identify relevant publications between 1971 and 2020. Results: In total, 1532 articles were identified, of which 78 met inclusion criteria and contained 5 communication guidelines. Three guidelines have been validated in randomized control trials (Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG), The Four Habits Model and ADAPT) and demonstrated improved patient reported outcomes and objective communication measures. Among guidelines’ core principles, 3 concepts are common to all: patient’s understanding and preference, prognosis, and responding to emotion. Conclusions: Communicating prognosis is a core competency skill in cancer care, yet remains underprioritized in training and practice. This review highlights available models and acknowledges areas in need of further understanding including how to maintain learned communication skills for lifelong practice.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes in cirrhosis: A scoping review of the literature

Hepatology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 2375-2383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot B. Tapper ◽  
Fasiha Kanwal ◽  
Sumeet K. Asrani ◽  
Chanda Ho ◽  
Nadia Ovchinsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Patient Reported
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document