Commentary on Jack Dowie, ?Decision validity should determine whether a genericor condition-specific HRQOL measure is used in health care decisions?

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Feeny
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Decisions ◽  
Hrqol Measure

Health Communication: Implications for Diverse Populations

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-19
Author(s):  
Amy Hasselkus
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Communication ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Linguistically Diverse ◽  
Good Health ◽  
The United States ◽  
Poor Health ◽  
Health Care Decisions ◽  
Diverse Backgrounds ◽  
Health Related

The need for improved communication about health-related topics is evident in statistics about the health literacy of adults living in the United States. The negative impact of poor health communication is huge, resulting in poor health outcomes, health disparities, and high health care costs. The importance of good health communication is relevant to all patient populations, including those from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Efforts are underway at all levels, from individual professionals to the federal government, to improve the information patients receive so that they can make appropriate health care decisions. This article describes these efforts and discusses how speech-language pathologists and audiologists may be impacted.

scholarly journals Erratum: Legal approaches regarding health-care decisions involving minors: implications for next-generation sequencing

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 658-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karine Sénécal ◽  
Kristof Thys ◽  
Danya F Vears ◽  
Kristof Van Assche ◽  
Bartha M Knoppers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Health Care Decisions ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Primary health care decision making in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-309
Author(s):  
Sandra Joan Campbell-Crofts ◽  
Janet Roden
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Primary Health Care System ◽  
Health Care Decisions ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Kidney Health

Objectives This qualitative descriptive study explored the primary health care decisions of a group of 12 Australians in Stages 3B to 5 with chronic kidney disease in the preservation of kidney health. Methods Questioning within the qualitative interviews focused on gaining an understanding of the participants’ perceptions of their kidney health and the decisions made as a consequence of their interaction within the Australian primary health care system. Results Participants were dependent on their General Practitioner to recognise their symptoms, make the correct diagnosis and authorise the correct referral for specialist nephrology care. Three pathways in this process were identified: ‘easy’; ‘difficult’ and ‘protracted’. Clinician failure to correctly attribute symptoms to chronic kidney disease influenced the ‘difficult’ pathway, while failure to adequately communicate kidney health status influenced the ‘protracted’ pathway. Use of the language of ‘recovery’, ‘stability’ and ‘protection’ held meaning to the participants in gaining an understanding of their kidney health. Discussion Identifying pathways to diagnosis and referral can raise awareness of the challenges kidney health consumers face in their participation within the primary health care arena. Using consumer meaningful language improves the capacity of these consumers to engage in their own primary health care agenda.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document