scholarly journals The impact of primary care physician density on perinatal health: Evidence from a natural experiment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Minet Kinge ◽  
Jostein Grytten
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Natural Experiment ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Perinatal Health ◽  
Physician Density ◽  
The Impact

Primary care physician services and the frequency of comorbidities in patients with acute myocardial infarction

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R King ◽  
D Giedrimiene
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The management of patients with multiple comorbidities represents a significant burden on healthcare each year. Despite requiring regular medical care to treat chronic conditions, a large number of these patients may not receive proper care. Significant disparities have been identified in patients with multiple comorbidities and those who experience acute coronary syndrome or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Only limited data exists to identify the impact of comorbidities and utilization of primary care physician (PCP) services on the development of adverse outcomes, such as AMI. Purpose The primary objective was to analyze how PCP services utilization can be associated with comorbidities in patients who experienced an AMI. Methods This study was based on retrospective data analysis which included 250 patients admitted to the Hartford Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for an AMI. Out of these, 27 patients were excluded due to missing documentation. Collected data included age, gender, medications and recorded comorbidities, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and previous arrhythmia. Each patient was assessed regarding utilization of PCP services. Statistical analysis was performed in order to identify differences between patients with documented PCP services and those without by using the Chi-square test. Results The records allowed for identification of documented PCP services for 172 out of 223 (77.1%) patients. The most common comorbidities were hypertension and hyperlipidemia: in 165 (74.0%) and 157 (70.4%) cases respectively. The most frequent comorbidity was hypertension: 137 out of 172 (79.7%) in pts with PCP vs 28 out of 51 (54.9%) without PCP, and significantly more often in patients with PCP, p< 0.001. Hyperlipidemia was the second most frequent comorbidity: in 130 out of 172 (75.6%) vs 27 out of 51 (52.9%) accordingly, and also significantly more often (p< 0.002) in patients with PCP services. The number of comorbidities ranged from 0-5, including 32 (14.3%) patients without comorbidities: 16 (9.3%) with a PCP and 16 (31.4%) without PCP services. The majority of patients - 108 (48.5% of 223), had 2-3 documented comorbidities: 89 (51.8%) had two and 19 (34.6%) had three. The remaining 40 (17.9%) patients had 4-5 comorbidities: 37 (21.5%) of them with a PCP and 3 (10.3%) without, with a significant difference (p < 0.001) found for patients with a higher number of comorbidities who utilized PCP services. Conclusions Our study shows that the majority of patients who presented with an AMI had one or more comorbidities. Furthermore, patients who did not utilize PCP services had fewer identified comorbidities. This suggests that there may be a significant number of patients who experienced AMI with undiagnosed comorbidities due to not having access to PCP services.

scholarly journals 3164 Do cancer survivors understand their risk factors for recurrence and the value of coordinated care between an oncologist and a primary care physician? A survey of endometrial and cervical cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 121-121
Author(s):  
Subhjit Sekhon ◽  
Lindsay Kuroki ◽  
Graham Colditz
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Cancer Site ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To evaluate gaps in knowledge for women who are cancer survivors regarding the impact of comorbidities and lifestyle behaviors on endometrial and cervical cancer risk, and to assess prevalence of established care with a primary care physician (PCP) among patients and evaluate acceptability of referral to a PCP METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Single institution cross-sectional study examining all women aged 18 or older with a diagnosis of cervical or endometrial cancer who present for care by a gynecologic oncologist at Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine. Patients will be invited to complete a survey specific to cancer diagnosis that includes questions on participant background and sociodemographic information, knowledge of risk factors for their specific cancer site, and whether or not the patient has a primary care provider and the acceptability of referring RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Majority of women will be unaware of how comorbidities affect cancer risk and treatment outcomes. For women without a PCP, we anticipate that they will be accepting towards the notion of being referred to one for establishing care. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Pilot information from this study will 1. Allow providers to improve cancer survivorship care plans by increasing collaboration between PCPs and oncologists to provide ongoing care, and 2. Afford information for providers on where gaps in knowledge exist so as to better education patients.

Elderly African-Americans and the Influenza Vaccine: The Impact of the Primary Care Physician

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
A NICOLEAU ◽  
C NICOLEAU ◽  
J BALZORA ◽  
A OBOH ◽  
N SIDDIQUI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Influenza Vaccine ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals National and Regional Variation in Local Primary Care Physician Density Relative to the Uninsured and the Affordable Care Act

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 004695801987380
Author(s):  
Barry C. Hill ◽  
Daniel Coster ◽  
David R. Black
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Medicaid Expansion ◽  
Physician Density ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Affordable Care Act ◽  
Access To Primary Care

This study is the first to examine primary care physician (PCP) density relative to the uninsured at the local level prior to and after insurance expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Primary care physician density is associated with access to care, lower inpatient and emergency care, and primary care services. However, access to primary care among the uninsured may be limited due to inadequate availability of PCPs. Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA) data from the Area Health Resource File were retrospectively examined before and after Medicaid expansion. Multiple logistic regressions were modeled for PCP density with predictor interaction effects for percentage uninsured, Medicaid expansion status, and US Census regions. Medicaid expansion CBSAs had significantly lower proportions of uninsured and higher PCP density compared with their nonexpansion counterparts. Nationally, increasing proportions of the uninsured were significantly associated with decreasing PCP density. Most notably, there is an expected 32% lower PCP density in Western Medicaid expansion areas with many uninsured (90th percentile) compared with those with few uninsured (10th percentile). Areas expanding Medicaid with greater proportions of people becoming insured postexpansion had significantly fewer PCPs. Areas with greater proportions of the uninsured may have reduced access to primary care due to the paucity of PCPs in these areas. Efforts to improve access should consider a lack of local PCPs as a limitation for ensuring accessible and timely care. Health care and policy leaders should focus on answers to improve the local availability of primary care clinicians in underserved communities.

scholarly journals Exploring the Impact of Primary Care Physician Burnout and Well-Being on Patient Care: A Focus Group Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e278-e283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise H. Hall ◽  
Judith Johnson ◽  
Jane Heyhoe ◽  
Ian Watt ◽  
Kevin Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Physician Burnout ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Impact of the Implementation of Project Re-Engineered Discharge for Heart Failure patients at a Veterans Affairs Hospital at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 266-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja H. Patel ◽  
Kimberly W. Dickerson
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact

Background: Hospitalizations due to chronic diseases such as heart failure (HF) continue to increase worldwide. Fragmentation of care while transitioning from one care setting to another is an important factor contributing to hospitalizations. Fragmented discharge tools have been implemented; however, the impact of a comprehensive interdisciplinary discharge tool has not been previously studied. Objective: The goal of this study is to assess the impact of the implementation of Project Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) on the incidence of hospital readmissions, all-cause mortality, primary care physician follow-up rate, and cost savings for patients with HF. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of patients admitted with HF exacerbation at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (CAVHS). A random sample of 100 patients admitted prior to implementation of Project RED and 50 patients after Project RED intervention were included in the study. The primary end point was 30-day hospital readmission for HF exacerbation. The co-secondary end points were all-cause mortality, cost savings, and rate of primary care physician appointments scheduled as well as attended per postdischarge recommendations. Results: The 30-day hospital readmission rate was 28% in the pre–Project RED group, and it was 18% in the post–Project RED group ( P = .18). The all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the post–Project RED group as compared with the pre–Project RED group (18% vs 41%, P = .04). More patients in the post–Project RED group attended an outpatient primary care appointment as recommended per postdischarge instructions (40% vs 19%, P = .006). In addition, with the decrease in hospital 30-day readmission rate in the post–Project RED group, there was a cost savings of $1453 per patient visit for HF exacerbation. Conclusions: Coordination of care using a discharge tool like Project RED should be utilized in institutions to improve patient outcomes as well as patient safety while decrease the overall health care cost.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document